the Influence of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Inflammation During Human Endotoxemia
NCT ID: NCT02602977
Last Updated: 2016-04-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Immunostimulation With GM-CSF or IFN-y on Immunoparalysis Following Human Endotoxemia
NCT01374711
Effect of Intrapulmonary Recombinant Human Activated Protein C (APC) on Coagulation and Inflammation After Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
NCT00943267
Anti-inflammatory Effects of Enriched Enteral Nutrition During Human Experimental Endotoxemia
NCT01100996
Pathophysiology and Clinical Relevance of Endotoxin Tolerance in Humans
NCT00246714
Study of Platelet Activation in Septic Shock Patients
NCT02635854
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The concept of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) was first described in the 1980's. Murry and colleagues showed a protective effect of preconditioning the heart with 4 cycles of 5-minute long ischemia on the extent of myocardial infarction in dog hearts. Follow-up animal studies showed the same protective effects on the heart by introducing the cycles of ischemia to distant, or 'remote', organs like the kidney or the gut. Furthermore, this principle of 'remote ischemic preconditioning' (RIPC) was also shown to be effective in humans when using a tourniquet to temporary cut off blood supply to one of the limbs, either an arm or a leg. As such, RIPC has been identified as a cheap and easy method of protecting patients undergoing elective CABG surgery from perioperative myocardial ischemic damage. In recent studies, two different timeframes in which RIPC exerts its protective effects have been identified. The classical or 'early window of protection' protects in the 1-2 hour after the RIPC stimulus while a 'second window of protection' is evident 12-24 hours after RIPC and lasts for 48-72 hours. Multiple-dose RIPC may be of additional value, as 7 daily doses of RIPC in humans resulted in protection of endothelial dysfunction, with both the local and remote beneficial effects lasting for up to 8 days after the last RIPC dose. This could be due to additive or synergistic effects of combining the first and second windows of protection.
The mechanisms behind the observed protective effects are however still subject of investigation. Several have been put forward, of which attenuation of the inflammatory response is a major candidate.
For instance, recent animal work has shown that RIPC results in downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 and upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10. In support of the latter, the cardioprotective effects of RIPC were absent in IL-10 knockout mice or in wild-type mice treated with a monoclonal antibody against the IL-10 receptor. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) has been shown to be a major contributor to this RIPC-induced IL-10 response.
Adenosine appears to be a major determinant of the anti-inflammatory and tissue-protective effects of RIPC. In a in vivo forearm model, adenosine and ischemic preconditioning both resulted in the same reduction in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Also, administration of exogenous adenosine can mimic the protective effects of IPC, and antagonizing the adenosine receptor with caffeine blocks the protective effects of RIPC and augments the anti-inflammatory IL-10 response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Interestingly, one of the pathways in which ischemia-reperfusion can increase adenosine levels is through upregulation of CD73, which is dependent on the aforementioned HIF.
Another possible mechanism behind the anti-inflammatory effects of RIPC is release of Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands, which in turn induce an endotoxin tolerance-like state. Endotoxin tolerance is a refractory state of the immune system after challenge with the TLR4 ligand LPS, characterized by diminished cytokine production upon a subsequent LPS challenge. However, induction of endotoxin tolerance was found to occur not only after LPS challenge but also using other TLR(4)-ligands, so-called 'cross-tolerance'. A possible candidate to induce tolerance in RIPC is heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), as extracellular HSP70 has been shown to induce tolerance to LPS in monocytes in vitro. Furthermore, in rats receiving ischemic preconditioning of the lower extremity, HSP70 expression was increased in the spinal cord and myocardium, and HSP70 upregulation was found in cardiomyocytes after RIPC in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. However, other, yet unidentified TLR ligands could also be involved.
From the abovementioned studies, it appears that RIPC exerts significant effects on the immune response. However, this has not yet been demonstrated in the setting of systemic inflammation in humans in vivo. Furthermore, the mechanisms behind the putative anti-inflammatory effects and possible additive or synergistic effects of repeated RIPC (thereby combining both the first and second windows of protection) are unknown as well. This study aims to investigate the effects of (repeated) ischemic preconditioning during human endotoxemia, a standardized controlled model of inflammation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
multiple-dose RIPC
Multiple-dose Remote Ischemic Preconditioning. A group of 10 subjects that will receive 4 cycles of remote ischemic preconditioning of the upper limb per day in the 7 consecutive days before the endotoxemia experiment. The last dose will be applied 40 minutes before LPS administration.
Multiple-dose Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
A blood-pressure cuff with handheld rubber inflation balloon and manometer is placed on the non-dominant arm of the subject. The cuff will be placed proximally from the elbow with the most proximal part of the cuff placed in the armpit. The cuff will be inflated to 250 mmHg after which a 5 minute countdown is started. After 5 minutes the pressure is released and the 5 minute countdown for reperfusion is started. This concludes one cycle out of a total of four.
1 "RIPC-dose" consists of 4 cycles of 5 minute ischemia followed by 5 minute reperfusion as described above.
Multiple-dose RIPC consists of a daily dose of 1 RIPC as described above for 7 consecutive days.
LPS infusion
To achieve a controlled inflammatory state, 30 subjects (multiple-dose RIPC group \[n=10\], single-dose RIPC group \[n=10\] and control group \[n=10\]) will receive LPS intravenously. The LPS at a dose of 2 ng/kg iv will be injected in 1 minute.
single-dose RIPC
Single-dose Remote Ischemic Preconditioning. A group of 10 subjects that will receive a single RIPC dose, starting 40 minutes before LPS administration.
Single-dose Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
A blood-pressure cuff with handheld rubber inflation balloon and manometer is placed on the non-dominant arm of the subject. The cuff will be placed proximally from the elbow with the most proximal part of the cuff placed in the armpit. The cuff will be inflated to 250 mmHg after which a 5 minute countdown is started. After 5 minutes the pressure is released and the 5 minute countdown for reperfusion is started. This concludes one cycle out of a total of four.
1 "RIPC-dose" consists of 4 cycles of 5 minute ischemia followed by 5 minute reperfusion as described above.
Single-dose RIPC consists of 1 dose of RIPC as described above
LPS infusion
To achieve a controlled inflammatory state, 30 subjects (multiple-dose RIPC group \[n=10\], single-dose RIPC group \[n=10\] and control group \[n=10\]) will receive LPS intravenously. The LPS at a dose of 2 ng/kg iv will be injected in 1 minute.
control group
Only LPS infusion. A group of 10 subjects that will be administered LPS without RIPC.
LPS infusion
To achieve a controlled inflammatory state, 30 subjects (multiple-dose RIPC group \[n=10\], single-dose RIPC group \[n=10\] and control group \[n=10\]) will receive LPS intravenously. The LPS at a dose of 2 ng/kg iv will be injected in 1 minute.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multiple-dose Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
A blood-pressure cuff with handheld rubber inflation balloon and manometer is placed on the non-dominant arm of the subject. The cuff will be placed proximally from the elbow with the most proximal part of the cuff placed in the armpit. The cuff will be inflated to 250 mmHg after which a 5 minute countdown is started. After 5 minutes the pressure is released and the 5 minute countdown for reperfusion is started. This concludes one cycle out of a total of four.
1 "RIPC-dose" consists of 4 cycles of 5 minute ischemia followed by 5 minute reperfusion as described above.
Multiple-dose RIPC consists of a daily dose of 1 RIPC as described above for 7 consecutive days.
Single-dose Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
A blood-pressure cuff with handheld rubber inflation balloon and manometer is placed on the non-dominant arm of the subject. The cuff will be placed proximally from the elbow with the most proximal part of the cuff placed in the armpit. The cuff will be inflated to 250 mmHg after which a 5 minute countdown is started. After 5 minutes the pressure is released and the 5 minute countdown for reperfusion is started. This concludes one cycle out of a total of four.
1 "RIPC-dose" consists of 4 cycles of 5 minute ischemia followed by 5 minute reperfusion as described above.
Single-dose RIPC consists of 1 dose of RIPC as described above
LPS infusion
To achieve a controlled inflammatory state, 30 subjects (multiple-dose RIPC group \[n=10\], single-dose RIPC group \[n=10\] and control group \[n=10\]) will receive LPS intravenously. The LPS at a dose of 2 ng/kg iv will be injected in 1 minute.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male subjects aged 18 to 35 years inclusive
* Healthy as determined by medical history, physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram and clinical laboratory parameters
Exclusion Criteria
* Smoking
* Use of recreational drugs within 21 days prior to endotoxemia experiment day
* Use of caffeine or alcohol within 1 day prior to endotoxemia experiment day
* Previous participation in a trial where LPS was administered
* Surgery or trauma with significant blood loss or blood donation within 3 months prior to endotoxemia experiment day
* Participation in another clinical trial within 3 months prior to endotoxemia experiment day
* History, signs, or symptoms of cardiovascular disease
* History of frequent vaso-vagal collapse or of orthostatic hypotension
* History of atrial or ventricular arrhythmia
* Hypertension (RR systolic \>160 or RR diastolic \>90)
* Hypotension (RR systolic \<100 or RR diastolic \<50)
* Conduction abnormalities on the ECG consisting of a 1st degree atrioventricular block or a complex bundle branch block
* Renal impairment: plasma creatinine \>120 µmol/L
* Liver function abnormality: alkaline phosphatase\>230 U/L and/or ALT\>90 U/L
* History of asthma
* Obvious disease associated with immune deficiency
* CRP \> 20 mg/L, WBC \> 12x109/L, or clinically significant acute illness, including infections, within 4 weeks before endotoxemia day
18 Years
35 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jelle Zwaag, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radboud University Medical Centre, Intensive Care
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zwaag J, Beunders R, Warle MC, Kellum JA, Riksen NP, Pickkers P, Kox M. Remote ischaemic preconditioning does not modulate the systemic inflammatory response or renal tubular stress biomarkers after endotoxaemia in healthy human volunteers: a single-centre, mechanistic, randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.037. Epub 2019 May 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RISPENDO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.