Phantom Limb Pain: Efficacy of Non-invasive Sensory Feedback Through the Prosthesis

NCT ID: NCT02589080

Last Updated: 2018-08-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2017-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Amputation of a limb may result from trauma or surgical intervention. The amputation traumatically alters the body image, but often leaves sensations that refer to the missing body part. In 50-80% amputees, neuropathic pain develops, also called phantom limb pain (PLP). Both peripheral and central nervous system factors have been implicated as determinants of PLP. Also, PLP may be triggered by physical (changes in the weather) and psychological factors (emotional stress). Recent evidence suggests that PLP may be intricately related to neuroplastic changes in the cortex, and that these changes may modulated by providing sensory input to the stump or amputation zone.

A non-invasive clinical trial will test the effectiveness of non-invasive pressure sensory feedback build into a hand prosthesis to alleviate phantom limb pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

During the pre-screen phase the investigators will assess whether the patient experiences referred phantom limb sensations or pain. In the case that the patient does experience referred sensations on the stump the investigators will map the areas where the sensation occurs on the stump and utilize this for placement of the surface actuators. In the opposite case, actuators will instead be placed in a matrix structure at the residual limb.

As a first step towards applying mechanical stimulation, the sensation thresholds (the level of stimulation where the subject first reports a sensation) have to be determined. The outcome of this procedure is a minimum of stimulation amplitude that can be applied for each stimulation site.

A first choice would be to use the referred map to place actuators. However, amputees have different phantom maps and also the number of areas varies.

A therapy will be defined based on the use of sensory feedback system integrated with the amputees hand prosthesis. The subject should use the hand prosthesis, with sensory feedback, for a duration of minimum 2 h per day during a 4 week period.

Preferably, the system should be used actively in normal daily activities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Phantom Limb Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Non-invasive sensory feedback

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Non-invasive sensory feedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A non-invasive simple sensory feedback system, which provides the user of a prosthetic hand with sensory feedback on the arm stump. It is mediated by air in a closed loop system connecting silicone pads on the prosthetic hand with pads on the amputation stump. The silicone pads in a "tactile display" on the amputation stump expand when their corresponding sensor-bulb in the prosthesis is touched, evoking an experience of "real touch". Most amputees experience phantom limb sensations and/or phantom limb pain, as well as residual limb stump pain. There is often a "map" of the phantom hand on the amputation stump, where pressure on specific skin areas result in evoked sensation from specific fingers in the amputated phantom hand. This map is the target for the sensory feedback.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-invasive sensory feedback

A non-invasive simple sensory feedback system, which provides the user of a prosthetic hand with sensory feedback on the arm stump. It is mediated by air in a closed loop system connecting silicone pads on the prosthetic hand with pads on the amputation stump. The silicone pads in a "tactile display" on the amputation stump expand when their corresponding sensor-bulb in the prosthesis is touched, evoking an experience of "real touch". Most amputees experience phantom limb sensations and/or phantom limb pain, as well as residual limb stump pain. There is often a "map" of the phantom hand on the amputation stump, where pressure on specific skin areas result in evoked sensation from specific fingers in the amputated phantom hand. This map is the target for the sensory feedback.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Transradial amputation
* Amputation should be in a stable phase
* Other treatments for PLP tried with poor result
* PLP experienced as over 6 on a visual analogue scale

Exclusion Criteria

* Cognitive impairment
* Pregnancy
* History of active substance abuse disorder
* Acquired brain injury with residual impairment
* Intelligence disability
* Neurologic or musculoskeletal disease or other diseases that may affect the function of nervous system
* Pacemaker
* dermatologic condition
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aalborg University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Freiburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Université Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Indiana University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aalborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lund University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Goran Lundborg

Professor Göran Lundborg

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fredrik Sebelius, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lund University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fredrik Sebelius

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EPIONE-LU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Kinematics of Ewing Amputees
NCT06371209 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION