Comparing Ultrasound Guided PICC Line Insertion in Neonates With Standard Procedure

NCT ID: NCT02584530

Last Updated: 2020-07-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-31

Study Completion Date

2020-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized controlled study comparing US guided vs standard procedure for PICC line placement in newborns admitted to Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who require a PICC line. Patients will be randomized using REDCap randomization module (stratified by gestational age \< 28 weeks and \>= 28 weeks and blocked to ensure approximate balance with each stratum) into two arms. - Arm 1: PICC line insertion procedure using anatomical landmarks and tip placement will be confirmed by X-ray (current standard); Arm 2: US guided PICC line insertion procedure and tip placement confirmation by both US and X-ray. Sample size of 33 infants per group would achieve greater than 80% power to detect a difference between groups.

Primary outcome: Time to complete the standard versus the US-guided procedure.

Secondary outcomes (comparison between two arms):

The number of total "venipuncture" attempts needed to place a PICC line Number of tip manipulations after complete insertion Proportion of successful tip placement

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line placement is one of the most commonly performed procedures in Neonatology. Due to prematurity and small vein size, the procedure often requires multiple attempts over an increased timeframe. As a standard of care, the position is confirmed by X-ray. Frequently, catheters are not optimally positioned, necessitating repositioning and further radiographs.

The use of ultrasound (US) guidance for PICC line placement enhances the visualization of the veins and provides a better selection for optimal access. It could decrease or even eliminate the need for X-rays when used to confirm the tip position.

Objectives To demonstrate that using US-guidance to place and confirm tip positioning for PICC line insertion in neonates will decrease the number of cannulation attempts, will shorten the time needed to complete the procedure, and will decrease infants' exposure to radiation.

Methods This is a randomized controlled study comparing US guided vs standard procedure for PICC line placement in newborns admitted to CHEO NICU who require a PICC line (approximately 130-150 infants per year). Patients will be randomized using REDCap randomization module (stratified by gestational age \< 28 weeks and \>= 28 weeks and blocked to ensure approximate balance with each stratum) into two arms - Arm 1: PICC line insertion procedure using anatomical landmarks and tip placement will be confirmed by X-ray (current standard); Arm 2: US guided PICC line insertion procedure and tip placement confirmation by both US and X-ray. A sample size of 33 infants per group would be sufficient to achieve greater than 80% power to detect a difference between groups.

Results of this study may demonstrate that US guided PICC line placement is superior (shorter and safer procedure, reduced radiation and pain) to currently used procedure and could lead to practice change.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ultrasonography, Interventional Peripheral Venous Catheterization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard procedure group

PICC line insertion using anatomical landmarks guidance and tip placement confirmation by X-ray

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventional group

Ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement and X-ray

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Apply ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement and positioning in newborns

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement

Apply ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement and positioning in newborns

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All newborns (0-28 days) admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who require PICC line insertion after consent has been obtained to include in this study. Including:

* Infants who need prolonged Total Parenteral Nutrition requirement of \> 7 days.
* Infants with difficult peripheral venous access who requires a central line
* Infants who require IV medications for \> 7 days.
* Infants who require medications given by central IV access
* Infants who will undergo complex surgical procedures and will require central IV access before procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

* Infants requiring isolation according to infection control protocols
* Unable to obtain or refused consent for PICC line and/or study enrolment
* Infants with any clinical contraindication for PICC line insertion as per unit policy
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

28 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nadya Ben Fadel

Neonatologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nadya Ben Fadel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20150456

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.