Comparing Ultrasound Guided PICC Line Insertion in Neonates With Standard Procedure
NCT ID: NCT02584530
Last Updated: 2020-07-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2020-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary outcome: Time to complete the standard versus the US-guided procedure.
Secondary outcomes (comparison between two arms):
The number of total "venipuncture" attempts needed to place a PICC line Number of tip manipulations after complete insertion Proportion of successful tip placement
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Application of Neck Ultrasound in the Assessment of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Tip Position
NCT00565877
Less Pain in Neonates During Central Lines Insertion
NCT03647293
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
NCT04268225
Central Venous Catheterization Techniques in Neonates
NCT02688595
Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters (PICC) in Children Guided by Ultrasound
NCT01279642
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The use of ultrasound (US) guidance for PICC line placement enhances the visualization of the veins and provides a better selection for optimal access. It could decrease or even eliminate the need for X-rays when used to confirm the tip position.
Objectives To demonstrate that using US-guidance to place and confirm tip positioning for PICC line insertion in neonates will decrease the number of cannulation attempts, will shorten the time needed to complete the procedure, and will decrease infants' exposure to radiation.
Methods This is a randomized controlled study comparing US guided vs standard procedure for PICC line placement in newborns admitted to CHEO NICU who require a PICC line (approximately 130-150 infants per year). Patients will be randomized using REDCap randomization module (stratified by gestational age \< 28 weeks and \>= 28 weeks and blocked to ensure approximate balance with each stratum) into two arms - Arm 1: PICC line insertion procedure using anatomical landmarks and tip placement will be confirmed by X-ray (current standard); Arm 2: US guided PICC line insertion procedure and tip placement confirmation by both US and X-ray. A sample size of 33 infants per group would be sufficient to achieve greater than 80% power to detect a difference between groups.
Results of this study may demonstrate that US guided PICC line placement is superior (shorter and safer procedure, reduced radiation and pain) to currently used procedure and could lead to practice change.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard procedure group
PICC line insertion using anatomical landmarks guidance and tip placement confirmation by X-ray
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventional group
Ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement and X-ray
Ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement
Apply ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement and positioning in newborns
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement
Apply ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement and positioning in newborns
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Infants who need prolonged Total Parenteral Nutrition requirement of \> 7 days.
* Infants with difficult peripheral venous access who requires a central line
* Infants who require IV medications for \> 7 days.
* Infants who require medications given by central IV access
* Infants who will undergo complex surgical procedures and will require central IV access before procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to obtain or refused consent for PICC line and/or study enrolment
* Infants with any clinical contraindication for PICC line insertion as per unit policy
1 Day
28 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nadya Ben Fadel
Neonatologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nadya Ben Fadel, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20150456
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.