Ultrasound Guided Vascular Access in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients

NCT ID: NCT00207883

Last Updated: 2017-04-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

212 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-31

Study Completion Date

2007-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to see how fast and accurate two different techniques used by physicians to insert catheters in children are. Catheters are tiny tubes which carry fluids, blood and sometimes liquid food into a person's vein. The technique currently used relies on the physical landmarks and using fingers to feel the anatomy in which to place the catheter in the vein or artery. The investigators are changing to a technique where they will use ultrasound at the patient's bedside to help physicians with placing the catheter into the blood vessel. They are comparing the use of these two methods to determine which is faster and requires fewer needle sticks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In critically ill patients, central venous access is essential for volume resuscitation, administration of medicines (such as vasoactive drugs, antibiotics or chemotherapy), administration of blood products, and hemodynamic monitoring. Placement of central venous catheters (CVC) occurs commonly with over 200,000 CVCs placed in adults and children yearly. At Egleston 222 central venous lines were placed last year and 178 CVCs YTD through October. Obtaining central venous access in critically ill children can be a difficult procedure with many potential complications. These complications can include, but are not limited to, hematoma at the site, hemothorax, pneumothorax, need to change sites, and injury to surrounding structures. The complication rates for CVCs in children is reported anywhere from 2.5% to 22%. All too frequently CVC placement in children is unsuccessful anywhere from 5% of the time to greater than 19%.

Studies in adults have shown ultrasound guided central venous access to decrease the number of attempts required to cannulate the vein. Ultrasound (US) guidance is also able to decrease the time required to cannulate the vessel. A meta analysis of ultrasound guided central venous access in adults concluded that for internal jugular procedures ultrasound guidance was significantly more successful than the landmark technique alone. With the recent focus on patient safety and clinical outcomes the American College of Emergency Physicians published a policy statement included in the guidelines use of US guidance for central venous access in a list of primary applications for ultrasound in the emergency department.

Evidence for US guidance in children is currently found mainly in the anesthesia literature. The 2003 NICE sponsored meta-analysis showed an overall relative risk reduction of 85% for failed placement and 73% for complications of internal jugular placement in pediatric patients in an operating room. Because of small sample sizes (each \< 100 patients) and only the internal jugular approach being studied, definitive conclusions regarding other sites are ongoing. Currently there are no prospective studies evaluating the use of ultrasound guided central venous access in children in a pediatric intensive care unit. Also, studies addressing the use of US guided CVC placement in femoral access, the major site used in children, is also lacking.

Our proposal is to prove that US guided CVC will decrease the overall time required to cannulate the vessel by increasing the probability of successful cannulation by the first operator, decreasing the number of skin punctures to obtain access, eliminating the need to change sites for access, and improving the probability of access. Additionally we believe that US guided CVC placement would decrease the likelihood of untoward effects including but not limited to severe hematoma requiring attempts at additional sites, inadvertent puncture of the wrong vessel, or hemothorax/pneumothorax.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Landmark

Procedure/Surgery: Use of landmarks for central line placement

No interventions assigned to this group

Ultrasound guided

Procedure/Surgery: Use of ultrasound for central line placement

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) who require vascular access.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age greater than 18 years.
* Any vascular catheter placed outside of the pediatric intensive care unit at Egleston.
* Any vascular catheter placed by a physician other than a member of the pediatric critical care team.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jana Stockwell

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jana A Stockwell, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

Curt Froehlich, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sznajder JI, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H, Weiner P, Bursztein S. Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches. Arch Intern Med. 1986 Feb;146(2):259-61. doi: 10.1001/archinte.146.2.259.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3947185 (View on PubMed)

Casado-Flores J, Barja J, Martino R, Serrano A, Valdivielso A. Complications of central venous catheterization in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;2(1):57-62. doi: 10.1097/00130478-200101000-00012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12797890 (View on PubMed)

Stenzel JP, Green TP, Fuhrman BP, Carlson PE, Marchessault RP. Percutaneous femoral venous catheterizations: a prospective study of complications. J Pediatr. 1989 Mar;114(3):411-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80559-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2921683 (View on PubMed)

Venkataraman ST, Thompson AE, Orr RA. Femoral vascular catheterization in critically ill infants and children. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1997 Jun;36(6):311-9. doi: 10.1177/000992289703600601.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9196229 (View on PubMed)

Miller AH, Roth BA, Mills TJ, Woody JR, Longmoor CE, Foster B. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Aug;9(8):800-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02168.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12153885 (View on PubMed)

Milling TJ Jr, Rose J, Briggs WM, Birkhahn R, Gaeta TJ, Bove JJ, Melniker LA. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: the Third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) Trial. Crit Care Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1764-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000171533.92856.e5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16096454 (View on PubMed)

Leung J, Duffy M, Finckh A. Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;48(5):540-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.011. Epub 2006 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17052555 (View on PubMed)

Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996 Dec;24(12):2053-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199612000-00020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8968276 (View on PubMed)

Keenan SP. Use of ultrasound to place central lines. J Crit Care. 2002 Jun;17(2):126-37. doi: 10.1053/jcrc.2002.34364.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12096376 (View on PubMed)

Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, Thomas S. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12919984 (View on PubMed)

Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Markowitz AJ. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001;(43):i-x, 1-668.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11510252 (View on PubMed)

American College of Emergency Physicians.. American College of Emergency Physicians. Use of ultrasound imaging by emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Oct;38(4):469-70. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.118487. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11574809 (View on PubMed)

Verghese ST, McGill WA, Patel RI, Sell JE, Midgley FM, Ruttimann UE. Ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous cannulation in infants: a prospective comparison with the traditional palpation method. Anesthesiology. 1999 Jul;91(1):71-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199907000-00013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10422930 (View on PubMed)

Verghese ST, McGill WA, Patel RI, Sell JE, Midgley FM, Ruttimann UE. Comparison of three techniques for internal jugular vein cannulation in infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2000;10(5):505-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.00554.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11012954 (View on PubMed)

Leyvi G, Taylor DG, Reith E, Wasnick JD. Utility of ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in pediatric surgical patients: a clinical series. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 Nov;15(11):953-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01609.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16238556 (View on PubMed)

Grebenik CR, Boyce A, Sinclair ME, Evans RD, Mason DG, Martin B. NICE guidelines for central venous catheterization in children. Is the evidence base sufficient? Br J Anaesth. 2004 Jun;92(6):827-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh134. Epub 2004 Apr 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15121722 (View on PubMed)

Pirotte T, Veyckemans F. Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation in infants and children: a novel approach. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;98(4):509-14. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem041. Epub 2007 Mar 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17332002 (View on PubMed)

Iwashima S, Ishikawa T, Ohzeki T. Ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided femoral vein access in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol. 2008 Mar;29(2):339-42. doi: 10.1007/s00246-007-9066-2. Epub 2007 Sep 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17851631 (View on PubMed)

Stenzel JP, Green TP, Fuhrman BP, Carlson PE, Marchessault RP. Percutaneous central venous catheterization in a pediatric intensive care unit: a survival analysis of complications. Crit Care Med. 1989 Oct;17(10):984-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198910000-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2791583 (View on PubMed)

Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger S: Analysis of Longitudinal Data. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp 162-168, 185- 189

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Johnson EM, Saltzman DA, Suh G, Dahms RA, Leonard AS. Complications and risks of central venous catheter placement in children. Surgery. 1998 Nov;124(5):911-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9823406 (View on PubMed)

Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, Gregurich MA, Ota DM. Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 29;331(26):1735-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412293312602.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7984193 (View on PubMed)

Milling T, Holden C, Melniker L, Briggs WM, Birkhahn R, Gaeta T. Randomized controlled trial of single-operator vs. two-operator ultrasound guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;13(3):245-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.09.004. Epub 2006 Feb 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16495416 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04-130

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CATCH - Catheter Infections in Children
NCT01029717 COMPLETED PHASE3