Early Non-invasive Detection of CTEPH After Pulmonary Embolism

NCT ID: NCT02555137

Last Updated: 2021-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

424 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, international, multicenter outcome cohort study. This study starts at the moment patients visit the outpatient clinic 3 to 6 months after a diagnosis of acute PE as part of routine medical care. If patients consent to study participation, the CTEPH clinical prediction score will be calculated. CTEPH is considered to be not present in patients with a low probability (≤6 points) and no symptoms suggestive of CTEPH, i.e. dyspnea on exertion, edema, newly developed palpitations, syncope or chest pains.The remaining patients with either high probability (\>6 points) or who report symptoms that may be associated with CTEPH will be subjected to the 'rule-out criteria'. CTEPH will be assumed not present in patients with an age- and gender dependent normal NT-proBNP level (as defined by the assay's manufacturer), in the absence of any of the 3 ECG criteria. Patients who have an abnormal result from the 'rule-out criteria' will be referred for transthoracic echocardiography. All echocardiograms will be performed according to a predefined standardized protocol.

In case of echocardiographic intermediate or high probability of PH, patients will be referred for further diagnostic work-up of suspected CTEPH starting with perfusion lung scan or VQ-scan and right heart catheterization, of which the results will be discussed by an independent interdisciplinary working group of PH specialists, to ensure optimal diagnostic management. This latter diagnostic work-up of an abnormal echocardiograph lies within the setting of standard medical care.

All patients who were not diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension of any origin, or with NYHA class III or IV heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or significant valvular lesions, will be followed for a total of 2 years from the index PE diagnosis. During that period, the study protocol will not interfere with standard patient care, allowing diagnostic tests as deemed indicated by the treating physician including echocardiography in case of new respiratory symptoms. At the end of the follow-up period, all patients will be subjected to a second echocardiography that will be handled according to the above stated procedures to evaluate the presence of CTEPH.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, international, multicenter outcome cohort study. This study starts at the moment patients visit the outpatient clinic 3 to 6 months after a diagnosis of acute PE as part of routine medical care. If patients consent to study participation, the CTEPH clinical prediction score will be calculated. This score consists of 6 variables that should be assessed at the time of PE diagnosis: unprovoked PE (+6 points), known hypothyroidism (+3 points), diagnostic delay \>2 weeks (+3 points), right ventricular dysfunction on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or echocardiography (+2 points), known diabetes mellitus (-3 points) and thrombolytic therapy or embolectomy for the acute PE event (-3 points) CTEPH is considered to be not present in patients with a low probability (≤6 points) and no symptoms suggestive of CTEPH, i.e. dyspnea on exertion, edema, newly developed palpitations, syncope or chest pains. The remaining patients with either high probability (\>6 points) or who report symptoms that may be associated with CTEPH will be subjected to the 'rule-out criteria'. CTEPH will be assumed not present in patients with an age- and gender dependent normal NT-proBNP level (as defined by the assay's manufacturer), in the absence of these 3 ECG criteria: 1) rSR' or rSr' pattern in lead V1, 2) R:S \>1 in lead V1 with R \>0.5mV and 3) QRS axis \>90o. Patients who have an abnormal result from the 'rule-out criteria' will be referred for transthoracic echocardiography. All echocardiograms will be judged by the echocardiographic criteria for suspected PH according to the 2015 ESC guidelines.

In case of echocardiographic intermediate or high probability of PH, patients will be referred for further diagnostic work-up of suspected CTEPH starting with perfusion lung scan or VQ-scan and right heart catheterization, of which the results will be discussed by an independent interdisciplinary working group of PH specialists, to ensure optimal diagnostic management. This latter diagnostic work-up of an abnormal echocardiograph lies within the setting of standard medical care.

All patients who were not diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension of any origin, or with NYHA class III or IV heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or significant valvular lesions, will be followed for a total of 2 years from the index PE diagnosis. During that period, the study protocol will not interfere with standard patient care, allowing diagnostic tests as deemed indicated by the treating physician including echocardiography in case of new respiratory symptoms. At the end of the follow-up period, all patients will be subjected to a second echocardiography that will be handled according to the above stated procedures to evaluate the presence of CTEPH.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

outcome cohort study

'prediction score' and 'rule-out criteria'

'prediction score' and 'rule-out criteria'

Intervention Type OTHER

The combination of the 'prediction score' and the 'rule-out criteria' constitutes an accurate follow-up after PE aimed at diagnosing CTEPH in early stages.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

'prediction score' and 'rule-out criteria'

The combination of the 'prediction score' and the 'rule-out criteria' constitutes an accurate follow-up after PE aimed at diagnosing CTEPH in early stages.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients with an objectivated first or recurrent diagnosis of symptomatic acute PE, who have been treated for at least three months with therapeutically dosed anticoagulant therapy according to current guidelines;
* Signed and dated informed consent of the subject available before the start of any specific study procedures;
* Age ≥18 years;

Exclusion Criteria

* Known CTEPH or PH;
* Known (i.e. echocardiographic confirmed) NYHA class III or IV chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or significant valvular lesions;
* Severe renal failure (eGFR \<15 ml/min) or renal replacement therapy;
* Medical or psychological condition that would not permit completion of the study or signing of informed consent, including life expectancy less than six months, or unwillingness to sign informed consent;
* Non-compliance or inability to adhere to treatment or to the follow-up visits.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Leiden University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Erik Klok

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

F.A. Klok, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis LUMC Leiden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UZ Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

VUmc

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

LUMC

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Haga

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

medical university of Warsaw

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Netherlands Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Klok FA, Tesche C, Rappold L, Dellas C, Hasenfuss G, Huisman MV, Konstantinides S, Lankeit M. External validation of a simple non-invasive algorithm to rule out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2015 May;135(5):796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25746363 (View on PubMed)

Klok FA, Surie S, Kempf T, Eikenboom J, van Straalen JP, van Kralingen KW, van Dijk AP, Vliegen HW, Bresser P, Wollert KC, Huisman MV. A simple non-invasive diagnostic algorithm for ruling out chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients after acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2011 Jul;128(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21450333 (View on PubMed)

Fabyan KD, Holley AB. Postpulmonary embolism syndrome. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2021 Sep 1;27(5):335-341. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000789.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34127618 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL54450.058.15

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.