A Open Label, Post Marketing Surveillance Study Following Transfusion of INTERCEPT Platelet Components
NCT ID: NCT02549222
Last Updated: 2022-02-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2291 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-12-31
2021-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
For each participating center, the study will start with a brief pilot run-in period with a group of at least 5 patients exposed only to conventional PCs. The purpose of this pilot run-in is to evaluate study logistics and data collection methods within each study center. Data from the pilot phase will be included in the data analysis for the treatment comparison.
After the pilot run-in period, the study will be conducted in two sequential patient cohorts: 1) the Control cohort during which study patients will receive only conventional PCs, and 2) the INTERCEPT cohort during which patients will receive only INTERCEPT PCs. Patient enrollment at each Center will be monitored to target similar numbers of patients into the Control and Test Cohorts within each center. Centers may enroll Control and Test patients in ratios that vary from 2:1 to 1:2 due to institutional requirements to move rapidly to full INTERCEPT implementation, or due to availability issues with either Test or Control components. Within each Center, patient enrollment will be stratified in four categories: (1) chemotherapy only; and by use of conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in (2) myeloablative conditioning, (3) non-myeloablative conditioning, and (4) reduced intensity using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) criteria. Note time from last chemotherapy treatment to first study transfusion should be no more than 30 days. To ensure both Test and Control cohorts have a similar allocation ratio (±10% per category) among the conditioning regimen strata, enrollment caps will be set for the Test cohorts, hence no Test patients will be enrolled to a stratum once the cap for the given stratum is met. Eligible patients will be enrolled in open Test strata sequentially as long as there is sufficient Test PC inventory available. Enrollment may be delayed for the Test cohort if sufficient inventory of Test PCs is not available.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Study of Individualized Care Plans for Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Survivors
NCT02200133
National Marrow Donor Program Long-Term Donor Follow-Up
NCT01362179
Home Blood Transfusions
NCT07121140
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors Study
NCT02652052
Prospective Cohort for the Evaluation of Biomarkers Following HCT (BMT CTN 1202)
NCT01879072
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pilot Run-in Period The pilot run-in period will be conducted in each center with a group of at least 5 patients exposed only to conventional PCs, who provide informed consent for data collection. The purpose of this pilot run-in is to evaluate study logistics and data collection methods within each study center. Data collection will not differ from that required in the two sequential patient cohorts. The data from the pilot phase will be included in the data analysis for the treatment comparisons.
Control and INTERCEPT Cohorts Following the run-in period, the study will be conducted in two sequential cohort periods. Informed consent for data collection without study specific treatment intervention, and under patient confidentiality, will be required for both cohorts prior to any study procedure.
During the Control cohort period, patients will have study data collected following transfusion with only conventional PCs for up to 21 days of transfusion support, as clinically indicated in a manner that is consistent with the local standard of care. During the INTERCEPT phase, patients will receive only INTERCEPT PCs under the same clinical treatment guideline. Patients will be transfused with only study PCs of the assigned treatment type (Conventional or INTERCEPT) in each cohort. Patients enrolled in the Conventional control cohort will be excluded from participating in the study in the INTERCEPT cohort.
Enrollment will be stratified by study center and type of primary disease therapy (chemotherapy only or HSCT with myeloablative, non-myeloablative, or reduced intensity conditioning).
For both cohorts, patients will be supported with study PC transfusions for a maximum of 21 days or until platelet transfusion independence. Patients are considered to have achieved platelet transfusion independence if more than 5 days elapse after exposure to a study PC transfusion. When a patient achieves platelet independence, the patient will have completed the study PC transfusion period (even if they subsequently resume another cycle of platelet support).
For the pilot phase and both cohort periods, all baseline O2 saturation values if available in the medical record should be recorded on eCRF. O2 measures associated with any form of respiratory therapy (except for room air ventilation) should be recorded with the indicated respiratory therapy for each day of therapy. If multiple measures are available in the medical record on a single day, then the worst value will be recorded.
Data collection for all participants will comprise: patient baseline disease characteristics, including primary disease, type of HSCT (auto, allo, cord blood, matched related or matched unrelated) or type of chemotherapy, and medications at study entry and during the study observation period. Patient clinical respiratory status, including, if available, a chest imaging study at baseline and O2 saturation by non-invasive pulse oximetry if available in the medical record prior to the first study transfusion in each cohort period, will also be recorded.
Within each study cohort, patients will be assessed for the primary outcome measure of assisted ventilation for a maximum of 28 days (7 days surveillance following up to of 21 days of study PC transfusion support). Patients with assisted ventilation within the defined timeframe will be further assessed for ARDS using the Berlin criteria by both the Investigator (based on diagnoses documented in the medical record) and the Pulmonary Adjudication Panel. Furthermore, AEs (including TR) will be collected from the primary medical record for 24 hours following the initiation of each study PC transfusion.; SAEs (including ARDS), CSPAEs (Grade 2 or higher AEs affecting the Respiratory System) and mortality will be collected for 7 days post each study transfusion (or until hospital discharge/discontinuation of outpatient platelet transfusion support, whichever is sooner). Investigators will assess the intensity of each AE and SAE and provide their assessment of the relationship of each AE and SAE to the study transfusion. Patients who experience the outcome of assisted ventilation, ARDS, or CSPAEs will be assessed as detailed in Assessment of Pulmonary Adverse Events in the synopsis and in Protocol Section 8.1.
For patients who achieve platelet independence before Study Day 21, AEs will be collected for 24 hours after initiating the last study platelet transfusion prior to platelet independence; the outcome of assisted ventilation, SAEs, ARDS, CSPAEs, and mortality will be collected for 7 days after the last study PC transfusion prior to platelet independence (or until hospital discharge/discontinuation of outpatient platelet transfusion support, whichever is sooner).
For patients who require more than 21 days of PC transfusion support, AEs will be recorded for up to 24 hours after the initiation of the last platelet transfusion up to and including Day 21; the outcome of assisted ventilation, SAEs, ARDS, CSPAEs, and mortality will be collected for up to a maximum of 28 days (7 days after up to 21 days of platelet transfusion support),7 days after initiating the last study transfusion within the 21-day study transfusion period (or until hospital discharge/discontinuation of outpatient platelet transfusion support, whichever is sooner). The lowest daily O2 saturation values in the medical record will be recorded on the eCRF as well.
Study-specific research personnel will review the patient medical record and record study outcomes on electronic Case Report Forms (eCRF). The intensity of AEs and SAEs will be graded according to the most recent version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) classification system. TR will also be assessed following the CDC National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Biovigilance Component Hemovigilance Module Surveillance Protocol (NHSN Protocol).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Cohort
During the Control cohort period patients will have study data collected following transfusion with only conventional PCs for up to 21 days of transfusion support, as clinically indicated in a manner that is consistent with the local standard of care.
Standard of Care
INTERCEPT Cohort
During the INTERCEPT phase, patients will receive only INTERCEPT PCs and will have study data collected following transfusion for up to 21 days of transfusion support, as clinically indicated in a manner that is consistent with the local standard of care.
Standard of Care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard of Care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written signed informed consent (unless exemption of individual consent is granted by the center's IRB).
Exclusion Criteria
* Documented allergy to psoralens
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cerus Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward L Snyder, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale New Haven Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
Yale-New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Beth Israel
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
St. Louis Children's Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering
New York, New York, United States
Strong Memorial Hospital
Rochester, New York, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
East Carolina University Hospital
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
TriHealth Cancer Institute
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wheeler AP, Snyder EL, Refaai M, Cohn CS, Poisson J, Fontaine M, Sehl M, Nooka AK, Uhl L, Spinella PC, Fenelus M, Liles D, Coyle T, Becker J, Jeng M, Gehrie EA, Spencer BR, Young P, Johnson A, O'Brien JJ, Schiller GJ, Roback JD, Malynn E, Jackups R, Avecilla ST, Liu K, Bentow S, Varrone J, Benjamin RJ, Corash LM. Acute pulmonary injury in hematology patients supported with pathogen-reduced and conventional platelet components. Blood Adv. 2024 May 14;8(9):2290-2299. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012425.
Delaney M, Karam O, Lieberman L, Steffen K, Muszynski JA, Goel R, Bateman ST, Parker RI, Nellis ME, Remy KE; Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding (TAXI-CAB), in collaboration with the Pediatric Critical Care Blood Research Network (BloodNet), and the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network. What Laboratory Tests and Physiologic Triggers Should Guide the Decision to Administer a Platelet or Plasma Transfusion in Critically Ill Children and What Product Attributes Are Optimal to Guide Specific Product Selection? From the Transfusion and Anemia EXpertise Initiative-Control/Avoidance of Bleeding. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;23(13 Suppl 1 1S):e1-e13. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002854.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLI 00112
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.