Risk Factors & Outcomes for Clinically Documented Infections in Pediatric Cancer Patients With Fever & Neutropenia
NCT ID: NCT02536599
Last Updated: 2023-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
360 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-10-31
2023-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fever and Neutropenia in Pediatric Oncology Patients
NCT03768869
A Study of Neutropenia and Anemia Management in Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Myelotoxic Chemotherapy
NCT00883181
Short-term Antibiotic Treatment for Unexplained Fever in Solid Cancer Patients With Febrile Neutropenia
NCT01450241
Efficacy of Lithium Against Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients
NCT05221593
Risk Assessment of Febrile Neutropenia and Grade 3-4 Neutropenia in Patients With Non-hematological Cancer Treated With Conventional Chemotherapy
NCT01799421
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It has long been recognized that not all neutropenic patients have the same risk of developing serious infections and/or complications.
Fever and infection represent the most important complications of myeloablative cytotoxic therapy that results in severe mucositis and prolonged neutropenia .
One of the most important concepts in the approach to infections in the febrile neutropenic patient is the recognition of risk. Risk can be defined in two ways. First, risk may be defined in terms of the probability for developing a febrile neutropenic infection; and second, it may be defined in terms of the likelihood for significantly poor outcomes due to that infection.
An understanding of the risks in the latter case may be used to define the approaches to management; for instance, in-patient versus out-patient treatment strategies and administration of intravenous versus oral formulations of antimicrobial therapy. These considerations have significant economic and quality of life ramifications.
Many institutions have developed simple clinical criteria to identify low-risk patients without having to calculate a risk-index score. This might be a more practical method in busy clinical settings, or as a tool in setting of low resource country.
Patients \& Methods:
The study will include children, either referred from the pediatric oncology clinic, or who have been previously admitted to the pediatric oncology department, those who have been documented with episodes of fever and neutropenia at South Egypt Cancer Institute (SECI), and fulfilling all criteria for enrollment in this study.
All the patients at the time of initial evaluation will be subjected to complete clinical history and full clinical examination.
The enrolled patients will be followed for either developing clinically evident infection e.g., pneumonia, gastroenteritis, meningitis, septicemia, etc.), or until resolution of fever and/ or neutropenia. The risk for either developing clinically evident infection, or not, will be assessed according to clinical and laboratory parameters, present at the time of initial evaluation to identify those patients who would be more prone to develop infection and/ or complications Fever is defined as a temperature greater than or equal to 38.3 C occurring once or a temperature greater than or equal to 38 C occurring twice during a 24-hour period.
Patients with an absolute neutrophilic count (ANC) of less than 500/mm3 and those with an ANC of less than 1,000/mm3 and decreasing will be considered neutropenic.
Complete blood count \& other diagnostic studies, including laboratory studies and imaging procedures will be obtained if needed to further evaluate and determine the source of fever and/or infection.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies or solid tumors.
* Patients admitted at the pediatric oncology department for at least 24-hour period after documentation of an episode of fever \& neutropenia at the time of initial evaluation at the pediatric oncology clinic.
* Patients who previously have been admitted at the pediatric oncology department, after documentation of an episode of fever \& neutropenia.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients not fulfilling the criteria for diagnosis of fever and neutropenia.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Mohammed Morsy, MD
Lecturer, Pediatric Oncology Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut University
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kern WV. Risk assessment and risk-based therapeutic strategies in febrile neutropenia. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2001 Aug;14(4):415-22. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200108000-00003.
Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Georgala A, Muanza F, Plehiers B, Dubreucq L, Lalami Y, Aoun M, Barette M. Outpatient oral antibiotics for febrile neutropenic cancer patients using a score predictive for complications. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 1;24(25):4129-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9909.
Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB, Boyer M, Elting L, Feld R, Gallagher J, Herrstedt J, Rapoport B, Rolston K, Talcott J. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: A multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(16):3038-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.16.3038.
Kleinberg M, Bow EJ. Introduction: Approach to the Patient. In Kleinberg M (ed) Managing Infections in Patients With Hematological Malignancies. Humana Press 2010; 1-12
Rolston KV. Risk assessment and risk-based therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;17(7):461-3. doi: 10.1007/BF01691127. No abstract available.
Rolston KI, Bodey G. Management of the Neutropenic Patient with Fever. In Safdar A (ed) Principles and Practice of Cancer Infectious Diseases. Humana Press 2011; 95-103.
Talcott JA, Finberg R, Mayer RJ, Goldman L. The medical course of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. Clinical identification of a low-risk subgroup at presentation. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Dec;148(12):2561-8.
Talcott JA, Siegel RD, Finberg R, Goldman L. Risk assessment in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: a prospective, two-center validation of a prediction rule. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Feb;10(2):316-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.2.316.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Doc Inf FN Ped Onc
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.