Study Investigating How Physicians Assess the Risk of Patients Developing Febrile Neutropenia During Chemotherapy.
NCT ID: NCT01813721
Last Updated: 2017-03-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1007 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-12-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Approximately 150-200 investigators will take part in about 100 sites in Europe, Canada and Australia. Approximately 1000 subjects will be studied, all of whom will have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or breast cancer and will be due to receive one of the specific chemotherapy regimens of interest.
Investigators' approach to FN risk assessment will be studied using lists of possible risk factors they may consider during their assessment. Investigators will be asked to select and rank the factors they consider the most important when assessing the overall FN risk of a subject and when making the decision whether to treat with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) primary prophylaxis (PP). They will be asked to make these selections based initially on their own routine clinical practise and subsequently relating specifically to each subject recruited.
This is a non-interventional study that involves no procedures outside normal care for the subjects; all data collection will be completed prior to chemotherapy administration.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Risk Assessment of Febrile Neutropenia and Grade 3-4 Neutropenia in Patients With Non-hematological Cancer Treated With Conventional Chemotherapy
NCT01799421
Prospective Observational Study of Febrile Neutropenia (FN) and Pegfilgrastim Primary Prophylaxis in Breast Cancer and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients Receiving High (>20%) FN-risk Chemotherapy
NCT02178475
A Study of Neutropenia and Anemia Management in Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Myelotoxic Chemotherapy
NCT00883181
Multi-level Evaluation of Chemotherapy-induced Febrile Neutropenia Prophylaxis, Outcomes, and Determinants With Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factor
NCT01459653
Feasibility Study of Monitoring by Web-application on Cytopenia Related to Chemotherapy
NCT02866851
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Design: Prior to identifying eligible subjects, Investigators will be registered and will record baseline information. During this Baseline Investigator Assessment investigators will be provided with two lists of risk factors. Investigators must rank selected risk factors that they consider to be the most important when assessing 1) overall FN risk (only scientific factors will be included), and 2) when deciding on whether G-CSF PP treatment will be used or not (this list will also contain non clinical factors). They will also record their own FN risk intervention threshold, which is the FN risk threshold score at which they would use G-CSF PP in their usual clinical practice.
Investigators will then prospectively and sequentially identify eligible subjects with NHL, breast or lung cancer who are due to initiate one of the permitted standard dose chemotherapy regimens listed in the protocol. The permitted chemotherapy regimens have an estimated intermediate FN risk (10%-20%) documented in published data and/or international guidelines.
For each enrolled subject, Investigators will complete a Subject Assessment prior to the start of their chemotherapy. They will be provided with the same two lists of risk factors as in the Baseline Assessment and asked to complete them based on each specific subject. Investigators must rank selected risk factors that they consider to be the most important when assessing 1) overall FN risk (only scientific factors will be included), and 2) when deciding on whether G-CSF PP treatment will be used or not. They will also document their final estimated FN risk score as a percentage based on the subject's medical history and standard of care (SOC) assessments (their routine practice for assessing this risk), and a decision as to whether G-CSF PP will be administered. Investigators will record which type of G-CSF they plan to use if one will be used.
End of Study for a subject will occur once these activities have been completed, and a prescription for the first cycle of chemotherapy has been written. The subject data collected will only be historical subject information and laboratory data from SOC assessments performed prior to beginning chemotherapy treatment. No data will be collected after the initiation of chemotherapy.
The approach to the statistical analysis will be generally descriptive in nature. The primary analysis will be conducted at two levels; investigator level and the subject level. It is expected that the opinions of investigators at a single site (that is, a department within a cancer treatment centre) will be correlated. Also, that the opinions about subjects from a single investigator will be more alike than subjects of other investigators; adjustments will be made in the analyses to account for this. Confidence intervals for the investigator level analysis and the subject level data will obtained from Multi-level Modelling (MLM) to allow for the expected intra-site and intra-investigator correlation of investigators within sites and subjects within investigator. In general, categorical data will be summarised by the number and percentage of subjects in each category. Continuous data will be summarised by mean, standard deviation, median, lower and upper quartiles, minimum and maximum values. Two-sided exact 95% confidence intervals (obtained using MLM) will be presented, where appropriate.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
All patients enrolled
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Any stage NHL, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or breast cancer initiating a new chemotherapy course
* Scheduled to receive one of the permitted standard dose chemotherapy regimens with an estimated intermediate (10%-20%) FN risk according to published data or guidelines (planned dose modifications +/-10% are allowable).
* Before any study-specific procedure, the appropriate written informed consent must be obtained where this is required by local regulations
Exclusion Criteria
* Ongoing or planned concurrent participation in any clinical study where the administration of Colony Stimulating Factor (CSF) is determined by the protocol (clinical trials on an approved drug and observational trials are permitted as long as these do not mandate how neutropenia should be treated)
* Prior stem-cell transplantation (includes bone marrow transplantation)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amgen
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Amgen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Research Site
Tweed Heads, New South Wales, Australia
Research Site
Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Research Site
Shepparton, Victoria, Australia
Research Site
Wodonga, Victoria, Australia
Research Site
Eggenburg, , Austria
Research Site
Graz, , Austria
Research Site
Leoben, , Austria
Research Site
Vienna, , Austria
Research Site
Vienna, , Austria
Research Site
Vöcklabruck, , Austria
Research Site
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Research Site
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Research Site
Alès Cédex, , France
Research Site
Arras, , France
Research Site
Besançon, , France
Research Site
Brest, , France
Research Site
Créteil, , France
Research Site
Grenoble, , France
Research Site
Marseille, , France
Research Site
Montluçon, , France
Research Site
Neuilly-sur-Seine, , France
Research Site
Nîmes, , France
Research Site
Pierre-Bénite, , France
Research Site
Saint-Quentin, , France
Research Site
Toulon, , France
Research Site
Villefranche-sur-Saône, , France
Research Site
Berlin, , Germany
Research Site
Bonn, , Germany
Research Site
Fulda, , Germany
Research Site
Mainz, , Germany
Research Site
Neustadt/Sachsen, , Germany
Research Site
Rostock, , Germany
Research Site
Stralsund, , Germany
Research Site
Twistringen, , Germany
Research Site
Athens, , Greece
Research Site
Athens, , Greece
Research Site
Athens, , Greece
Research Site
Athens, , Greece
Research Site
Chania, , Greece
Research Site
Larissa, , Greece
Research Site
Nea Kifissia, Athens, , Greece
Research Site
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Research Site
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Research Site
Thessaloniki, , Greece
Research Site
Cork, , Ireland
Research Site
Galway, , Ireland
Research Site
Catania, , Italy
Research Site
Florence, , Italy
Research Site
Foggia, , Italy
Research Site
Monza (MB), , Italy
Research Site
Pordenone, , Italy
Research Site
Reggio Calabria, , Italy
Research Site
Roma, , Italy
Research Site
Torino, , Italy
Research Site
Varese, , Italy
Research Site
Bialystok, , Poland
Research Site
Bydgoszcz, , Poland
Research Site
Elblag, , Poland
Research Site
Gdynia, , Poland
Research Site
Lodz, , Poland
Research Site
Lodz, , Poland
Research Site
Szczecin, , Poland
Research Site
Warsaw, , Poland
Research Site
Wroclaw, , Poland
Research Site
Brasov, , Romania
Research Site
Brasov, , Romania
Research Site
Brăila, , Romania
Research Site
Bucharest, , Romania
Research Site
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
Research Site
Cluj-Napoca, , Romania
Research Site
Focşani, , Romania
Research Site
Iași, , Romania
Research Site
Onești, , Romania
Research Site
Oradea, , Romania
Research Site
Piteşti, , Romania
Research Site
Suceava, , Romania
Research Site
Timișoara, , Romania
Research Site
Timișoara, , Romania
Research Site
Huelva, Andalusia, Spain
Research Site
Málaga, Andalusia, Spain
Research Site
Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain
Research Site
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
Research Site
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain
Research Site
Ávila, Castille and León, Spain
Research Site
Valladolid, Castille and León, Spain
Research Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Research Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Research Site
Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
Research Site
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Freyer G, Kalinka-Warzocha E, Syrigos K, Marinca M, Tonini G, Ng SL, Wong ZW, Salar A, Steger G, Abdelsalam M, DeCosta L, Szabo Z. Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia. Med Oncol. 2015 Oct;32(10):236. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0682-z. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
Lyman GH, Dale DC, Legg JC, Abella E, Morrow PK, Whittaker S, Crawford J. Assessing patients' risk of febrile neutropenia: is there a correlation between physician-assessed risk and model-predicted risk? Cancer Med. 2015 Aug;4(8):1153-60. doi: 10.1002/cam4.454. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
AmgenTrials clinical trials website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20110146
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.