Double-blind Trial of Sodium Thiosulfate for the Treatment of Pain Associated With Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy

NCT ID: NCT02527213

Last Updated: 2025-05-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-30

Study Completion Date

2016-08-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the efficacy of Sodium Thiosulfate (STS) compared to placebo, in reducing analgesic requirement in subjects with calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) during an initial 28-day treatment phase.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Efficacy of Sodium Thiosulfate (STS) compared to placebo, in reducing analgesic requirement in subjects with calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) during an initial 28-day treatment phase.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Calciphylaxis Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sodium Thiosulfate

Sodium Thiosulfate at 25g in 100 ml normal sterile saline (NSS)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sodium thiosulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Additional treatment(s) due to lesion progression When intervention occurs, the date of the intervening event should be recorded in the source documents and the (CRF). The subject should continue in the study as scheduled.

Placebo

similarly-formulated placebo in 100 ml NSS

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Additional treatment(s) due to lesion progression When intervention occurs, the date of the intervening event should be recorded in the source documents and the (CRF). The subject should continue in the study as scheduled.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sodium thiosulfate

Additional treatment(s) due to lesion progression When intervention occurs, the date of the intervening event should be recorded in the source documents and the (CRF). The subject should continue in the study as scheduled.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Additional treatment(s) due to lesion progression When intervention occurs, the date of the intervening event should be recorded in the source documents and the (CRF). The subject should continue in the study as scheduled.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males or females ≥18 years of age who are able to give informed consent.
2. Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA), either newly-diagnosed or pre-existing, currently on STS or not yet treated with STS and either not on pain medication or on a stable pain medication regimen. The diagnosis of calciphylaxis can be made when:

* The following clinical features are all present, or two (2) of the following clinical features and typical histopathological findings are present.

Clinical features:

1. A patient on chronic hemodialysis for chronic kidney disease or with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 15/ml/min/1.73 m2
2. More than 2 painful and non-treatable skin ulcers with concomitant painful purpura
3. Painful and non-treatable skin ulcers on the trunk, extremities, or penis with concomitant painful purpura

Histopathological findings by skin biopsy when 3 clinical findings are not present:

1. Necrosis and ulceration of the skin with calcification of the tunica media and internal elastic membrane of small to medium-sized arterioles of dermis and subcutaneous fat are essential for the diagnosis
2. Concentric stenosis due to edematous intimal thickening is also seen in the small to medium-sized arterioles of dermis and subcutaneous fat
3. End stage renal disease (ESRD) on chronic maintenance hemodialysis.
4. Willingness to undergo washout of pre-existing STS treatment (if required by treatment allocation) and to continue in a double blind treatment period of 4 weeks, during which they might receive placebo.
5. Ability to comply with all study requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of allergic or other adverse reaction to STS
2. Current treatment with STS for indications other than CUA (e.g. cyanide poisoning)
3. Currently on alternative treatment for CUA as listed below. Unless treatment has been discontinued for at least 1 month prior to the screening visit.

1. Steroids
2. Hyperbaric Oxygen
3. Bisphosphonates
4. Pentoxifylline
5. Tissue Plasminogen Activator
6. Lucilia sericata larvae (maggot therapy)
7. On Cinacalcet for treatment for CUA (i.e. cinacalcet was either started or dose increased after the appearance of lesions)
4. Any co-existing disease or problem that makes participation in the study unadvisable for the patient or compromises integrity of the study

1. Cirrhosis of the liver
2. History of congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) with multiple hospital admissions (at least 3 admissions in 6 months)
3. Persistent and uncontrolled metabolic acidosis
5. Chronic kidney disease or renal transplant patients with diagnosis of calciphylaxis who are not on hemodialysis.
6. Any other disease or condition which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would place a subject at undue risk by being enrolled in the trial, or cause inability to comply with the trial
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American Regent, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Linda Mundy, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

American Regent, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nephrology Consultants

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Nephrology Association of Northern Indiana

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

A.A. Northeast Clinical Research Center

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1STS12001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

20070360 Incident Dialysis
NCT00803712 COMPLETED PHASE4
Phase 3 Study of SK-1403
NCT03801980 COMPLETED PHASE3
Phase 3 Study of KHK7580
NCT02549391 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3