Effectiveness of Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) and Voluntary Trunk Rotation for Neglect

NCT ID: NCT02526238

Last Updated: 2020-10-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-31

Study Completion Date

2020-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a double blinded, randomized control trial with a pretest-posttest control and interventional group design. The assessor is blinded to all assessments and evaluations. All patients with subacute stroke undergo in-patient or out-patient rehabilitation are screened initially by a series of screening test. Suitable patients are assigned randomly to two groups respectively. Group 1 is the experimental group for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and trunk rotation; Group 2 is the control group with only trunk rotation training and placebo stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methodology

Sampling:

Convenient sampling will be conducted to all in and out-patients with stroke referred consecutively to occupational therapy department in Kowloon Hospital during the data collection period. Patients who meet the following inclusion criteria are admitted for study.

Inclusion criteria

1. First or second stroke (haemorrhagic or ischaemic) confirmed by computer axial tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging
2. Neurological representation compatible with a unilateral right lesion involvement (i.e. left hemiplegic), exhibited left visual field inattention or neglect by following either one of below criteria:

* obtaining a total score of star cancellation subtest in the conventional battery of the Behavioral Inattention Test \<51 (out of 54)
* obtaining a total score of line bisection subtest in the conventional battery of the Behavioral Inattention Test \<7 (out of 9)
* Score of Catherine Bergego Scale ≥ 1
3. Right handed
4. Less than six months since onset of stroke at study entry
5. Able to follow simple command

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with severe dysphasia (either expressive or comprehensive) which restricts communication;
2. History of other neurological disease, psychiatric disorder, or alcoholism;
3. significant impairment in visual acuity caused by cataracts, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma or hemianopia
4. Any additional medical or psychological condition that would affect their ability to comply with the study protocol.

Data Collection and Treatment Procedures Written consent is obtained from all subjects before the randomization. All patients in both the experimental and placebo groups undergo the same rehabilitation process. Subject's demographic data are collected; they include age, gender, lesion site, educational level, time after onset of stroke, and global cognitive status as defined by the Mini-mental State Examination - Chinese version (CMMSE). Repeated measurements are done at day 0 (date for initial assessment), day 10 (end of treatment) and post 4 weeks. Assessments including Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) - Chinese version, Catherine Bergego Scale, Functional Test for the hemiplegic upper extremity (FTHUE-HK), Upper-extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Scale (UE-FM), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Stroke Adapted 30 item version of the Sickness Impact Profile (SA-SIP 30) score will be done at these intervals by a blind assessor.

Treatment sessions for the experimental groups and control groups are conducted by trained investigator for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and the case therapists. The conventional treatment would consist of 45 minutes of voluntary trunk rotation exercise using set-up equipment as well as 15 minutes of activities of daily living (ADL) training.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TMS and trunk rotation

TMS and trunk rotation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TMS and trunk rotation

Intervention Type DEVICE

TMS and trunk rotation

Sham TMS and trunk rotation

Sham TMS and trunk rotation

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham TMS and trunk rotation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham TMS and trunk rotation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TMS and trunk rotation

TMS and trunk rotation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham TMS and trunk rotation

Sham TMS and trunk rotation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. First or second stroke (haemorrhagic or ischaemic) confirmed by computer axial tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging
2. Neurological representation compatible with a unilateral right lesion involvement (i.e. left hemiplegic), exhibited left visual field inattention or neglect by following either one of below criteria:

* obtaining a total score of star cancellation subtest in the conventional battery of the Behavioural Inattention Test \<51 (out of 54)
* obtaining a total score of line bisection subtest in the conventional battery of the Behavioural Inattention Test \<7 (out of 9)
* Score of Catherine Bergego Scale ≥ 1
3. Right handed
4. Less than six months since onset of stroke at study entry
5. Able to follow simple command

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with severe dysphasia (either expressive or comprehensive) which restricts communication;
2. History of other neurological disease, psychiatric disorder, or alcoholism;
3. significant impairment in visual acuity caused by cataracts, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma or hemianopia
4. Any additional medical or psychological condition that would affect their ability to comply with the study protocol.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kowloon Hospital, Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marko Chan

Occupational Therapist, PhD Candidate

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eric Yeung, MBChB

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kowloon Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kowloon Hospital

Kowloon, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fong KN, Chan MK, Ng PP, Tsang MH, Chow KK, Lau CW, Chan FS, Wong IP, Chan DY, Chan CCh. The effect of voluntary trunk rotation and half-field eye-patching for patients with unilateral neglect in stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2007 Aug;21(8):729-41. doi: 10.1177/0269215507076391.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17846073 (View on PubMed)

Cazzoli D, Muri RM, Schumacher R, von Arx S, Chaves S, Gutbrod K, Bohlhalter S, Bauer D, Vanbellingen T, Bertschi M, Kipfer S, Rosenthal CR, Kennard C, Bassetti CL, Nyffeler T. Theta burst stimulation reduces disability during the activities of daily living in spatial neglect. Brain. 2012 Nov;135(Pt 11):3426-39. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws182. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22831781 (View on PubMed)

Longley V, Hazelton C, Heal C, Pollock A, Woodward-Nutt K, Mitchell C, Pobric G, Vail A, Bowen A. Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 1;7(7):CD003586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003586.pub4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34196963 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KC/KE-15-0035

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.