The Only Blood Culture for Diagnosis of Bacteremia - Comparative Study of Practice
NCT ID: NCT02516514
Last Updated: 2015-08-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
302 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-12-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators propose to evaluate a single blood culture sampling technique with seeding 4 vials (2 aerobic and anaerobic 2).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic Performance of Plasma Procalcitonin for the Detection of Blood Cultures Contaminations
NCT04573894
Impact of Performing a Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Test on Antibiotic Therapy Adaptation in Adult Patients with Enterobacterales Bacteremia
NCT06425367
Diagnosis of Bacteremia/Septicemia and Culture Negative Endocarditis by the Karius Sequencing-Based Infectious Disease Diagnostic Assay
NCT02988414
Clinical Impact of Rapid AST Directly From Blood Cultures
NCT03992703
Beta-lactams Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
NCT05352997
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multi-sampling strategy
2 or 3 blood cultures in 24 hours worked at ½ hour intervals with seeding at least a pair of flasks, aerobic and anaerobic, by blood culture.
Single-sampling strategy vs multi-sampling strategy for the diagnosis of bacteremia
Comparison between two strategies of blood culture (single-sampling strategy and multi-sampling strategy) for the diagnosis of bacteremia
Single-sampling strategy
1 single dose of venous blood 30ml ± 10ml with seeding 4 blood culture bottles (aerobic and anaerobic 2 2).
Single-sampling strategy vs multi-sampling strategy for the diagnosis of bacteremia
Comparison between two strategies of blood culture (single-sampling strategy and multi-sampling strategy) for the diagnosis of bacteremia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Single-sampling strategy vs multi-sampling strategy for the diagnosis of bacteremia
Comparison between two strategies of blood culture (single-sampling strategy and multi-sampling strategy) for the diagnosis of bacteremia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients admitted to an emergency department of a three CHU Caen, Lille, Rouen
* Patient with clinical justifying the realization of blood cultures (as good practice recommendations)
* Patients who received information about the study or if his legal representatives or his close entourage
* Patient not objecting to the venipuncture
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient refusing venipuncture
* Patient aged under 18
* Patient with impaired vigilance and not accompanied by a family member or a trusted person may receive clear information protocol
* Vulnerable Patient and not accompanied by a family member or a trusted person may receive clear information protocol
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cockerill FR 3rd, Wilson JW, Vetter EA, Goodman KM, Torgerson CA, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Ilstrup DM, Washington JA 2nd, Wilson WR. Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 15;38(12):1724-30. doi: 10.1086/421087. Epub 2004 May 25.
Li J, Plorde JJ, Carlson LG. Effects of volume and periodicity on blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2829-31. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.11.2829-2831.1994.
Arendrup M, Jensen IP, Justesen T. Diagnosing bacteremia at a Danish hospital using one early large blood volume for culture. Scand J Infect Dis. 1996;28(6):609-14. doi: 10.3109/00365549609037969.
Lamy B, Roy P, Carret G, Flandrois JP, Delignette-Muller ML. What is the relevance of obtaining multiple blood samples for culture? A comprehensive model to optimize the strategy for diagnosing bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Oct 1;35(7):842-50. doi: 10.1086/342383. Epub 2002 Sep 10.
Lee A, Mirrett S, Reller LB, Weinstein MP. Detection of bloodstream infections in adults: how many blood cultures are needed? J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Nov;45(11):3546-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01555-07. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-033
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.