Tumescent Antibiotic Delivery for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection

NCT ID: NCT02503904

Last Updated: 2015-07-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The principal aim of the present research is to compare two methods of antibiotic delivery: concomitant tumescent antibiotic delivery (TAD) and intravenous antibiotic delivery (IVAD) versus IVAD alone, (TAD+IVAD vs IVAD), with respect to the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). The investigators hypothesize that TAD+IVAD will significantly reduce the incidence of SSI compared to IVAD.

TAD is the subcutaneous infiltration of a dilute solution of antibiotic(s) in a solution of tumescent local anesthesia (TLA). TLA consists of a dilute solution of lidocaine (1gm/L), epinephrine (1mg/L) and sodium bicarbonate (10mEq/L) in 0.9% physiologic saline.

A secondary aim of this study is to compare TAD+IVAD vs IVAD with respect to the prevention of post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Tumescent antibiotic delivery (TAD) is defined as the subcutaneous infiltration of a dilute solution of antibiotic(s) in a solution of tumescent local anesthesia (TLA). TLA consists of a dilute solution of lidocaine (1gm/L), epinephrine (1mg/L) and sodium bicarbonate (10mEq/L) in 0.9% physiologic saline.

The investigators hypothesize that TAD with intravenous antibiotic delivery (IVAD) will significantly reduce the incidence of SSI.

The Principal aim of the present research is to compare two methods of antibiotic delivery: concomitant TAD and IVAD versus IVAD alone (TAD+IVAD vs IVAD) with respect to the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). The secondary aim of this study is to compare TAD+IVAD vs IVAD with respect to the prevention of post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE). This research is an open label randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing two modes of antibiotic delivery. It is not a trial comparing antibiotics.

The target populations for the present clinical trial are patients who have a high risk of SSI. These include patients exposed to high-risk surgical procedures (open abdominal surgeries, trauma surgeries, burn surgeries, sternotomy) or are obese, have diabetes, are immune-compromised or are otherwise at increased risk of SSI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgical Site Infections Venous Thromboembolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAD+IVAD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Concomitant Tumescent Antibiotic Delivery & IV Delivery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Concomitant subcutaneous infiltration of a dilute antibiotics (cefazolin and metronidazole) in a dilute solution of tumescent lidocaine and epinephrine at the site of a proposed surgical incision.

Subcutaneous Tumescent Infiltration

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subcutaneous tumescent infiltration using HK tumescent infiltration cannulas and HK tumescent infiltration pump

cecefazolin and metronidazole (in a dilute solution of tumescent lidocaine, epinephrin and sodium bicarbonate in 0.9% physiologic saline)

Intervention Type DRUG

IVAD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Concomitant Tumescent Antibiotic Delivery & IV Delivery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Concomitant subcutaneous infiltration of a dilute antibiotics (cefazolin and metronidazole) in a dilute solution of tumescent lidocaine and epinephrine at the site of a proposed surgical incision.

cecefazolin and metronidazole (in a dilute solution of tumescent lidocaine, epinephrin and sodium bicarbonate in 0.9% physiologic saline)

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Concomitant Tumescent Antibiotic Delivery & IV Delivery

Concomitant subcutaneous infiltration of a dilute antibiotics (cefazolin and metronidazole) in a dilute solution of tumescent lidocaine and epinephrine at the site of a proposed surgical incision.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Subcutaneous Tumescent Infiltration

Subcutaneous tumescent infiltration using HK tumescent infiltration cannulas and HK tumescent infiltration pump

Intervention Type DEVICE

cecefazolin and metronidazole (in a dilute solution of tumescent lidocaine, epinephrin and sodium bicarbonate in 0.9% physiologic saline)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TAD+IVAD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. Subjects greater than 18 years of age scheduled for surgical procedure considered to have a high risk for a surgical site infection (SSI) such as 1) secondary repair of a ventral hernia, 2) open bariatric surgery, 3) open abdominal colorectal surgery, 4) trauma surgery, 5) burn surgery or 6) sternotomy.

2\. Patients must have one of the following risk factors for surgical site infection: emergency surgery, obesity, diabetes mellitus, cancer surgery, be immune-compromised or otherwise be at an increased risk for SSI.

3\. Only adults will participate as research subjects 4. This study will involve both males and females 5. Patients in ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) class I or II or III or IV will be included. Treatment assignment will be stratified with respect to ASA classification.

6\. Abdominal wound classifications: Clean-Contaminated, Contaminated, or Dirty are eligible to participate. Treatment assignment will be stratified with respect wound classification. Similarly, trauma and burn patients will be classified.

7\. Patient must be able to understand the same written and spoken language as either the surgeon or nurse who provides informed-consent information to the patient.

8\. Patients must be appropriately screened for the proposed surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

Procedures involving only simple ostomy closures 2. Known allergy to cefazolin or metronidazole or an antibiotic preferred and routinely used by the surgeon 3. Persons less than 18 years old 4. Emergency operation as designated by the surgeon will be included only with the appropriate approval by the institutional IRB at an individual research site 5. Pregnant or breast-feeding women 6. A known bleeding/hemorrhagic/thrombotic disorder is exclusionary unless there is a written clearance chart-note or clearance letter from a primary care physician or hematologist 7. Significant psychiatric problems which might impair ability to give truly informed consent or which may impair follow-up communication with the surgeon and staff 8. Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias are exclusionary unless there is a written clearance chart-note or clearance letter from a cardiologist 9. Heart/liver/kidney disease, neuropsychiatric disease classifying patient as ≥ ASA V 10. Major concomitant infections such as pneumonia or sepsis 11. In non-emergency surgery, pre-existing active bacterial skin infection at the time of the surgical incision; however, pre-existing bacterial infections are not exclusionary in burn or trauma patients.

12\. Foreign material in the incision that cannot be removed 13. Recent systemic antimicrobial therapy 14. Clinically significant renal impairment or a creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min.

Vulnerable Subjects are excluded

1. Pregnant women
2. Nursing home residents, or other institutionalized persons are not fully alert, not cognizant or and not able to give informed consent are not eligible to participate as a research subject
3. Children \< 18 years of age
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Klein, Jeffrey A., M.D.

INDIV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jeffrey A Klein, MD

Role: CONTACT

949-283-1070

Joan Cotham

Role: CONTACT

949-369-0101

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TAD4SSI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Local Antibiotics for Breast Implants
NCT04731025 RECRUITING PHASE3