Effects of Iloprost on Pulmonary Hemodynamics and Oxygenation in Patients of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease During One-lung Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT02490657

Last Updated: 2016-06-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The inhaled Iloprost, approved for pulmonary hypertension, caused increase in oxygenation, and increase exercise tolerance in ARDS or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Inhaled iloprost has been researched in animal study, but not yet in human during one-lung ventilation. The investigators will enroll patients who diagnosed moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperative pulse oximetry (SpO2) of below 95% at room air or PaO2 /FiO2 ratio\< 150 mmHg after initiating one-lung ventilation. The primary outcome is pulmonary oxygenation expressed by PaO2 /FiO2 ratio. And secondary outcome is assessment of cardiac function including Tei-index during nebulizing iloprost. The investigators hypothesized inhaled iloprost will improve oxygenation and decrease the FiO2 in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during one-lung ventilation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Iloprost group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Inhaled iloprost

Intervention Type DRUG

Nebulized agents (Iloprost or normal saline) were randomized by computer-generated randomization. The patients and anesthesiologist, who administered inhalation and conducted all this trial, were blinded to the medication allocation. An anesthesiologist, who responsible for preparation of medication, was the only person recognizing of the randomization code during trial.

Enrolled patients were received 20 μg iloprost or placebo (norma saline). Iloprost was diluted in normal saline to obtain 2ml solution. Control group were inhaled comparable dose of normal saline. Iloprost or normal saline was inhaled through an ultrasonic nebulized system in inspiratory limb.

normal saline

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

normal saline (Saline 0.9%)

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Inhaled iloprost

Nebulized agents (Iloprost or normal saline) were randomized by computer-generated randomization. The patients and anesthesiologist, who administered inhalation and conducted all this trial, were blinded to the medication allocation. An anesthesiologist, who responsible for preparation of medication, was the only person recognizing of the randomization code during trial.

Enrolled patients were received 20 μg iloprost or placebo (norma saline). Iloprost was diluted in normal saline to obtain 2ml solution. Control group were inhaled comparable dose of normal saline. Iloprost or normal saline was inhaled through an ultrasonic nebulized system in inspiratory limb.

Intervention Type DRUG

normal saline (Saline 0.9%)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was defined as FEV1/FVC ratio \< 0.7 and an FEV 1 of 80% or less after inhalation bronchodilator : 1. Above 40 years of age.
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status II, III.
3. Preoperative SpO2 95 % or less at room air (spontaneous ventilation) or 4. PaO2 /FiO2 ratio\< 150 mmHg after initiating one-lung ventilation

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severe functional liver or kidney disease
2. Diagnosed HF (LV ejection fraction \<50% , or wall motion abnormality)
3. Arrhythmia or received treatment with antiarrythmic drug .
4. Severe bradycardia(HR \< 45 bpm) and AV block 6. pathologic esophageal lesion (esophageal stricture or varix ) 7. pregnancy 8. PaO2 /FiO2 ratio ≥ 150 mmHg after initiating one-lung ventilation
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institue, Yonsei Universiy College of Medicine

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2015-0283

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.