Outpatient Vasodilator Assessment Using Iloprost in Pulmonary Hypertension

NCT ID: NCT03044314

Last Updated: 2024-04-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-21

Study Completion Date

2020-05-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the clinical efficacy of inhaled iloprost as an invasive, selective vasodilator in the cardiac catheterization laboratory in patients with pulmonary hypertension to the gold standard of inhaled nitric oxide. It will also examine whether echocardiographic estimates of response to inhaled iloprost can predict responsiveness to invasive vasodilator testing in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Iloprost was the first inhaled prostacyclin analogue to be FDA-approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Iloprost aerosol has been shown to significantly improve pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (PH), with an effect greater than nitric oxide and sildenafil. It has also been shown to be more effective than nitric oxide at reducing pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) than prostacyclin infusion when used in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Because of its administration through inhalational means, iloprost has the advantage of selective action on the pulmonary vasculature with avoidance of the systemic side effects that plague many of the other treatments for PH. The investigators intend to compare the efficacy of inhaled iloprost in reducing pulmonary artery pressure to the gold standard of nitric oxide in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Without an established noninvasive algorithm to identify beneficial hemodynamic response to vasodilators, patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) are routinely subjected to expensive and invasive testing. Echocardiography is routinely used to facilitate a diagnosis of PH and a few echocardiographically-derived estimates have even been shown to correlate with vasodilator responsiveness and survival. Dynamic, real time changes in echocardiographic parameters have not been previously evaluated as a predictor of vasodilator responsiveness or of clinical outcome. The investigators will examine whether echocardiographic changes in response to inhaled iloprost can predict invasively derived vasodilator responsiveness and help assess prognosis in patients with pulmonary hypertension, possibly even obviating the need for invasive testing.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Iloprost and nitric oxide administration

Each patient will receive 40 ppm inhaled nitric oxide and 2.5-5 mcg inhaled iloprost in the catheterization laboratory with assessment of hemodynamic response. Patients will also receive 2.5-5 mcg iloprost during echocardiographic assessment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Iloprost and nitric oxide administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Iloprost will be administered by the I-neb ultrasonic nebulizer (Respironics, Cedar Grove, New Jersey) with a disposable attachment that allows for administration to a supine patient at a concentration of 10 µg/ml with a 10 minute dose of 2.5 µg and then repeated to a cumulative dose of 5.0 µg if tolerated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Iloprost and nitric oxide administration

Iloprost will be administered by the I-neb ultrasonic nebulizer (Respironics, Cedar Grove, New Jersey) with a disposable attachment that allows for administration to a supine patient at a concentration of 10 µg/ml with a 10 minute dose of 2.5 µg and then repeated to a cumulative dose of 5.0 µg if tolerated.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ventavis

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients no younger than 18 years of age
* Recently diagnosed pulmonary hypertension (defined by RV systolic pressure of ≥ 40 mmHg as measured by echocardiography), going for invasive hemodynamic assessment for pulmonary hypertension
* Normal left ventricular function defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to 50%

Exclusion Criteria

* Heart failure (LVEF \< 50%, diastolic dysfunction \> stage 1, history or symptoms of left heart failure) - Group II pulmonary hypertension
* 2+ or higher MR or AI
* Inadequate echocardiographic windows
* Pregnancy
* Systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Actelion

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard A Krasuski, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University Health System

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00075840

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.