Mesenchymal Stem Cell Augmentation in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

NCT ID: NCT02484950

Last Updated: 2025-07-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-15

Study Completion Date

2024-06-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Mesenchymal stem cells promote tissue regeneration by differentiating into adult cell lines and by supplying growth factors to their implanted environment. They have been shown to be effective in improving both overall healing and tendon integrity in rotator cuff repair. This study will follow 100 patients in the United States and track their clinical outcomes for at least one year post-operatively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rotator cuff repair is one of the most commonly performed arthroscopic procedures in the United States, but re-tear remains a common long-term complication. This can lead to pain, decreased shoulder function, and the need for corrective surgery. Mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to improve healing rates in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, primarily due to their retained ability to differentiate into several different adult cell lines, such as tenocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts. MSCs further enhance the healing process by releasing growth factors into the local environment to promote tissue regeneration.

While MSC augmentation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has led to higher rates of healing and improved tendon integrity, there remains a paucity of data surrounding clinical improvement after the procedure. Outcomes such as post-operative strength, range of motion, and shoulder function have yet to be compared with standard rotator cuff repair. The incidence of post-operative persistent structural defects in the tendon after MSC augmentation must also be further elucidated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rotator cuff repair with stem cells

Using clinically accepted methods, subjects will undergo bone marrow aspiration (from hip, proximal humerus or tibia) through a small incision prior to arthroscopy in the group undergoing MSC augmentation. They will then undergo arthroscopic full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, TOE anchor/suture technique with mesenchymal stem cell augmentation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mesenchymal stem cell augmentation in rotator cuff repair

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Patients undergoing mesenchymal stem cell augmentation will receive a total injection of 6 milliliters (mL). Of this, 3 mL will be injected in the tendon at the junction between bone and tendon, while 3 mL will be injected in the bone at the site of the surgical footprint.

Standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients will undergo full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, transosseous-equivalent (TOE) repair with anchor/suture technique. Acromioplasty will be performed in all patients. Alternate procedures such as biceps tenotomy/tenodesis and distal clavicle excision will be performed at the discretion of the surgeon and recorded.

Rotator cuff repair without stem cells

Subjects will undergo arthroscopic full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, TOE anchor/suture technique, without augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells. To maintain patient blinding, all patients will receive a small incision around the site of expected bone marrow aspiration (hip, proximal humerus, or tibia), regardless of whether or not they receive bone marrow.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

All patients will undergo full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, transosseous-equivalent (TOE) repair with anchor/suture technique. Acromioplasty will be performed in all patients. Alternate procedures such as biceps tenotomy/tenodesis and distal clavicle excision will be performed at the discretion of the surgeon and recorded.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mesenchymal stem cell augmentation in rotator cuff repair

Patients undergoing mesenchymal stem cell augmentation will receive a total injection of 6 milliliters (mL). Of this, 3 mL will be injected in the tendon at the junction between bone and tendon, while 3 mL will be injected in the bone at the site of the surgical footprint.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

All patients will undergo full thickness rotator cuff repair using a double row, transosseous-equivalent (TOE) repair with anchor/suture technique. Acromioplasty will be performed in all patients. Alternate procedures such as biceps tenotomy/tenodesis and distal clavicle excision will be performed at the discretion of the surgeon and recorded.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient is determined to have a full thickness rotator cuff tear (1-3 cm) or partial tear converted to a full-thickness tear-on the pre-operative MRI scan or found arthroscopically-and is scheduled to undergo surgical repair
* Written informed consent is obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Revision surgery
* Irreparable tear or partial repair
* Any patient lacking decisional capability
* Subscapularis involvement
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rush University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nikhil N Verma, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

MacDonald P, McRae S, Leiter J, Mascarenhas R, Lapner P. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 2;93(21):1953-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00488.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22048089 (View on PubMed)

Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 May 15;61(5):623-32. doi: 10.1002/art.24396.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19405008 (View on PubMed)

Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Green A, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Feb;92(2):296-303. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01296.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20124055 (View on PubMed)

Cole BJ, Kaiser JT, Wagner KR, Sivasundaram L, Otte RS, Tauro TM, White GM, Ralls ML, Yanke AB, Forsythe B, Romeo AA, Verma NN. Prospective Randomized Trial of Biologic Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2023 Apr;51(5):1234-1242. doi: 10.1177/03635465231154601. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36811557 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15042702

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RSA Vs RCR for Massive RCTs
NCT05807854 RECRUITING NA