Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Users of Oral Antithrombotic Drugs
NCT ID: NCT02481011
Last Updated: 2018-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
22111 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-05-31
2016-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hopefully, this study will contribute to a more responsible prescription pattern of antithrombotic medications.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adverse Drug Events in Patients on Oral Anticoagulation in the Emergency Department
NCT06692504
Prevalence and Causes of Preventable and Serious Adverse Drug Reactions Related to the Use of Oral Anticoagulants
NCT02720328
Reporting of Adverse Events in Patients Treated With New Oral Anticoagulants
NCT02107651
A Study of Severe Uterine Bleeding Following Exposure to Direct Oral Anticoagulants
NCT04394234
Pharmacogenetics of Acenocoumarol
NCT01492777
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This makes antithrombotic therapy a double-edged sword. Although a certain risk for bleeding may be acceptable in the context of even greater protection against ischemic events, it is important to quantify the magnitude of bleeding risk. So far the efficacy and safety profile of antithrombotic agents are generally assessed in randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, extrapolating the results from randomized clinical trials to the general patient population in this context is challenging. Patients who participate in clinical trials are frequently highly selected and therefore somewhat unrepresentative. In addition, their numbers are limited and the treatment period is often much shorter than in routine management of a chronic disease or condition. Finally, patients in clinical trials are often monitored more closely than in routine practice.
The incidence of intracranial hemorrhage due to antithrombotic therapy could theoretically be monitored by post-marketing surveillance by including spontaneously reported events. Unfortunately, it seems this does not provide more reliable estimates. A recent study from Finland has shown that bleeding complications due to oral anticoagulation with Warfarin are underreported in daily clinical practice. Further, it has been shown that reporting rates of side effects following medical therapy tend to decrease over time indicating that it is more likely that adverse events to a newer drug are reported than to a drug that has been available for many years. This is why population-based large-scale pharmaco-epidemiological studies are needed, in which cohorts of patients exposed to antithrombotic medications are monitored to determine a valid and reliable risk of the treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
users
patients on antithrombotic drugs admitted to a Norwegian hospital for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)
antithrombotic drugs
non-users
patients not on antithrombotic drugs admitted to a Norwegian hospital for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
antithrombotic drugs
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* residential address in Norway
Exclusion Criteria
* Parenteral antithrombotic treatment
* ICH related to tumor or vascular malformation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
OTHER
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sasha Gulati, md phd
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Olavs Hospital
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gulati S, Solheim O, Carlsen SM, Oie LR, Jensberg H, Gulati AM, Giannadakis C, Jakola AS, Salvesen O. Risk of intracranial hemorrhage in users of oral antithrombotic drugs: Study protocol for a nationwide study. F1000Res. 2015 Dec 30;4:1519. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7633.1. eCollection 2015.
Gulati S, Solheim O, Carlsen SM, Oie LR, Jensberg H, Gulati AM, Madsbu MA, Giannadakis C, Jakola AS, Salvesen O. Risk of intracranial hemorrhage (RICH) in users of oral antithrombotic drugs: Nationwide pharmacoepidemiological study. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202575. eCollection 2018.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014/7958
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.