Two Resistance Training Protocols to Reduce the Risk of Falls in Parkinson's Disease
NCT ID: NCT02476266
Last Updated: 2020-03-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
53 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-31
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Resistance Training in Parkinson Disease: A Pilot Study
NCT02674724
Exercise for Adults With Parkinson Disease
NCT02615548
Sensory Attention Focused Exercise in Parkinson's Disease
NCT01246700
Intensity of Aerobic Training and Neuroprotection in Parkinson's Disease
NCT04046276
Comparing the Effects of Instability Resistance Training Versus Aerobic Training on Cognitive and Motor Improvements Found in Parkinson's Disease Participants
NCT03711955
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Purpose: Therefore the purpose of this study is to examine the effects of two different forms of resistance training (RT) to improve the muscular deficits experienced, as well to improve the balance impairments experienced as it has been suggested that RT is able to do this not only in healthy older adults but in those with PD as well. The two RT programs that will be investigated are a conventional strength training (ST) program and a high velocity strength training, known as power training (PT) program.
Objective/Aim: The objective of this study is to identify if ST or PT is a more effective rehabilitation program to improving muscle strength and power, balance measures and reducing the risk of falls. Due to the nature of the PT intervention it is hypothesized that these individuals will experience the greatest improvements in outcome measures.
Methods/Design: This study will be a double blind randomized controlled trial. Participants will be blinded to group allocation except for the control group, however those in the interventional group will only be informed that they are participating in a RT program. The primary investigator will only collect measures that are considered to be objective at follow up time points. Pre-intervention measures will all be collected prior to randomization into group allocations. The assessor of disease severity will also be blinded to group allocation.
Participants will be randomized to one of three groups: i) a control group (to account for normal disease progression for the duration of the intervention); ii) ST group and iii) PT group.
The intervention will be a total of 12 weeks long, where participants will come in two days per week for an hour long session each day, for a total of 24 session.
Participants randomized to the ST group will complete three sets of 8-10 repetitions at 70% of their one repetition maximum (1-RM), as determined during their pre-test. Those randomized to the PT group will complete three sets of 12-15 repetitions at 40% of their 1-RM, as determined during their pre-test. Both programs involve individualized exercise prescriptions based on the results of their predicted 1-RM. This program will be designed by a Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology Certified Exercise Physiologist, who has the knowledge and ability to safely test and prescribe exercise to individuals with chronic conditions. Both programs will be progressive in nature, in that as each individual is able to complete the last set, for two consecutive training sessions at the higher end of the range of repetitions (i.e. for the ST group 10 or more repetitions), the next session their weight will be increased by 5%. Upon completion participants will complete all outcome measures again. These measures will be completed during a wash out period at 3 months and 6 months post intervention to investigate the potential long term effects of these rehabilitation programs, and if either is more advantageous in the long term.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Participants randomized to this group will come in for testing at pre-intervention, post-intervention, three month wash out and six month wash out. Participants will be asked to continue their activities of daily living. To account for any physical activity changes over the length of the study the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) questionnaire will be administered to all individuals. A control group is necessary to compare to show normal disease progression over the length of the study as well as to demonstrate that improvements in outcome measures are due to the interventions and not practice effects.
No interventions assigned to this group
Strength Training
Individuals randomized to this program will complete three sets of eight to ten repetitions at 70% of their predicted 1-RM for each of the exercises mentioned above. The speed of the movements in this program will be two to three seconds each for the concentric and eccentric components. When participants are able to complete ten repetitions in their third set for two consecutive days, weight will be increased for the following session by 5% of the current weight that they are at in accordance with Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) and American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines. Participants will complete a total of 24 sessions over the course of 12 weeks, two times per week for an hour each session.
Resistance Training
Resistance training has been shown to improve balance and muscle weakness in those with PD as well as reducing the number of falls experienced, albeit not significantly. However to date no study has investigated forms of resistance training in the same study. To disentangle which form of resistance training might be more effective at reducing the risk of falls, improving balance and muscle strength, the proposed study will compare power training and conventional strength training.
Power Training
Participants randomized to this program will complete three sets of 12 to 15 repetitions completed at 40% of predicted 1-RM for each exercises. The concentric part of the movement will be completed as fast as possible, whereas the eccentric component will be accomplished in two to three seconds. The load in this group is lower as it has been shown that by performing power training at lighter loads, the muscles are able to be activated, throughout the entire concentric component, while maintaining a consistent level of force. The progression will be determined through the same means as the conventional strength training group. Participants will complete a total of 24 sessions over 12 weeks, twice per week for an hour each session
Resistance Training
Resistance training has been shown to improve balance and muscle weakness in those with PD as well as reducing the number of falls experienced, albeit not significantly. However to date no study has investigated forms of resistance training in the same study. To disentangle which form of resistance training might be more effective at reducing the risk of falls, improving balance and muscle strength, the proposed study will compare power training and conventional strength training.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Resistance Training
Resistance training has been shown to improve balance and muscle weakness in those with PD as well as reducing the number of falls experienced, albeit not significantly. However to date no study has investigated forms of resistance training in the same study. To disentangle which form of resistance training might be more effective at reducing the risk of falls, improving balance and muscle strength, the proposed study will compare power training and conventional strength training.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to stand two minutes, unassisted
* Able to understand English instructions
* Signed Physical Activity Readiness Medical Examination (PARmed-X) by physician
Exclusion Criteria
* peripheral neuropathy
* physical impairments that would prevent participation in the muscular strength testing
* uncontrolled hypertension
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sun Life Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brittany Intzandt
Graduate Student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brittany Intzandt, BSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Wilfrid Laurier University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sunlife Financial Movement Disorders Research and Rehabilitation Centre- Wilfrid Laurier University
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Glendinning DS, Enoka RM. Motor unit behavior in Parkinson's disease. Phys Ther. 1994 Jan;74(1):61-70. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.1.61.
Stolze H, Klebe S, Baecker C, Zechlin C, Friege L, Pohle S, Deuschl G. Prevalence of gait disorders in hospitalized neurological patients. Mov Disord. 2005 Jan;20(1):89-94. doi: 10.1002/mds.20266.
Wielinski CL, Erickson-Davis C, Wichmann R, Walde-Douglas M, Parashos SA. Falls and injuries resulting from falls among patients with Parkinson's disease and other parkinsonian syndromes. Mov Disord. 2005 Apr;20(4):410-415. doi: 10.1002/mds.20347.
Newton RU, Murphy AJ, Humphries BJ, Wilson GJ, Kraemer WJ, Hakkinen K. Influence of load and stretch shortening cycle on the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation that occurs during explosive upper-body movements. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(4):333-42. doi: 10.1007/s004210050169.
Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, Caro-Valenzuela J, Adams A, Cryns N, Monsef I, Dresen A, Roheger M, Eggers C, Skoetz N, Kalbe E. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 8;4(4):CD013856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub3.
Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, Lieker E, Caro-Valenzuela J, Adams A, Cryns N, Monsef I, Dresen A, Roheger M, Eggers C, Skoetz N, Kalbe E. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 5;1(1):CD013856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3992
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.