2 Dose Neuraxial Morphine for Prevention of PDPH

NCT ID: NCT02473276

Last Updated: 2025-02-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neuraxial analgesia (most commonly continuous epidural or combined spinal epidural) is the most effective modality available for pain relief during labor. Accidental dural puncture (ADP) with a large bore epidural needle and the resulting post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most significant sources of anesthesia-related morbidity in parturients.

Epidural blood patch (EBP) is the gold standard for treatment of PDPH, and although almost always effective, can result in another ADP, as well as low back pain and lower extremity pain. For this reason, effective measures to prevent PDPH when ADP occurs would be highly valuable. One small study in which 50 women were randomly allocated to receive 2 epidural injections of morphine or saline, demonstrated a beneficial effect of epidural morphine in decreasing the incidence of PDPH.

This study aims to determine the efficacy of 2 doses of neuraxial (either epidural (EPID) or intrathecal) preservative-free morphine (PFM) to prevent headache after ADP in parturients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a prospective, randomized, double blind clinical trial. Subjects will be ASA I and II women (per American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System or ASA) aged 18 years and older, who are known to have had ADP with an epidural needle during placement of neuraxial labor analgesia, and have either an intrathecal catheter or epidural catheter in situ. Patients will be randomized to either receive PFM or placebo (sterile normal saline (NS or SAL)).

For patients with an epidural catheter, the group "EPID PFM" will receive 3 mg (6 ml) of PFM, followed by 3 ml of sterile normal saline to be administered through the epidural catheter. The placebo group, "EPID NS", will receive 6 ml of sterile normal saline via the epidural catheter followed by another 3 ml NS. For patients with an intrathecal catheter, the group, "IT PFM" will receive 200 micrograms (mcg) (0.4 ml) of preservative-free morphine, followed by a flush of the catheter with 2 ml of sterile saline. The placebo group will receive 0.4 ml and then 2 ml of sterile normal saline through the intrathecal catheter. Sixteen to 24 hours after receiving the first study drug, patients in all groups will be visited by an investigator, and then daily thereafter during the hospital admission. They will be evaluated for the presence of headache, analgesia requirements, need for EBP and the severity of opioid side effects. As long as the patient is afebrile, has not been experiencing severe opioid side effects and the catheter is in place and intact, the patient will then receive the identical study drug (for a total of two doses). The epidural/intrathecal catheter will be removed immediately after the second administration of the study drug.

After discharge, the patient will be followed up once daily by telephone for up to a minimum of 5 days after receiving the last dose of the study drug if they remain headache free, and for a minimum of 3 days after resolution of PDPH.

Statistical Design:

This will be a prospective randomized double blind clinical trial. The primary outcome will be the incidence of PDPH at 48 hours after ADP. The primary outcome of the trial is the incidence of PDPH at 48 hours after ADP. We will consider a difference in incidence of PDPH between the placebo and treatment groups of 25 % to be significant, based on the findings of Al Metwalli et al. (Anaesthesia. 2008; 63(8):847-50), and the meta-analysis by Heesen et al. (Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 ; 22(1):26-30).

Estimates of PDPH rate after ADP range from 50 to 85%. Our rate at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) for the past several years is 66% (OB Anesthesia Division QA data). For calculation of our sample size, we determined that an absolute 25% decrease in PDPH would be clinically significant (i.e., 66% to \~40%). For a power of 90% and an alpha of 0.05, this requires 83 subjects per group (2 epidural groups compared to each other, 2 spinal groups compared to each other). We are not specifically powering this for comparison of the spinal to the epidural groups, although we will likely be able to do so. We therefore, aim to recruit 100 subjects per group (for a total of 400 across all centers) assuming 10-15% of subjects may be lost because of inadvertent withdrawal of the catheter, subject withdrawal, or lost to follow up after discharge.

This is intended to be a multicenter study involving 5 academic tertiary hospitals, having \>2,000 vaginal deliveries per year. Since the rate of accidental dural puncture is between 1 and 2%, we estimate we should be able to recruit 100 subjects per year. Categorical data (presence or absence of dural puncture headache, need for epidural blood patch) will be analyzed using Chi-square analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postdural Puncture Headache

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EPID PFM

The group "EPID PFM" will receive 3 mg (6 ml) of preservative-free morphine, followed by 3 ml of sterile normal saline, to be administered through the epidural catheter.Sixteen to 24 hours after receiving the first study drug, the patient will then receive the identical study drug (for a total of two doses).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Morphine

Intervention Type DRUG

preservative free morphine given either via an epidural or intrathecal catheter

Sterile normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

sterile normal saline, given either via an epidural or intrathecal catheter

EPID SAL

The placebo group, "EPID NS", will receive 6 ml of sterile normal saline via the epidural catheter followed by another 3 ml NS. Sixteen to 24 hours after receiving the first study drug,the patient will then receive the identical study drug (for a total of two doses).

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sterile normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

sterile normal saline, given either via an epidural or intrathecal catheter

IT PFM

The group, "IT PFM" will receive 200 micrograms (mcg) (0.4 ml) of preservative-free morphine via the intrathecal catheter, followed by a flush of the catheter with 2 ml of sterile saline.Sixteen to 24 hours after receiving the first study drug, the patient will then receive the identical study drug (for a total of two doses).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Morphine

Intervention Type DRUG

preservative free morphine given either via an epidural or intrathecal catheter

Sterile normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

sterile normal saline, given either via an epidural or intrathecal catheter

IT SAL

The placebo group IT SAL will receive 0.4 ml and then 2 ml of sterile normal saline through the intrathecal catheter.Sixteen to 24 hours after receiving the first study drug, the patient will then receive the identical study drug (for a total of two doses).

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sterile normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

sterile normal saline, given either via an epidural or intrathecal catheter

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Morphine

preservative free morphine given either via an epidural or intrathecal catheter

Intervention Type DRUG

Sterile normal saline

sterile normal saline, given either via an epidural or intrathecal catheter

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Duramorph Saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects will be ASA I and II women aged 18 years and older, who are known to have had accidental dural puncture with an epidural needle during placement of neuraxial labor analgesia, and have either an intrathecal catheter or epidural catheter in place.

Exclusion Criteria

* Past history of headache syndromes- such as migraine and cluster headaches
* History of chronic pain syndromes
* Chronic opioid use
* Illicit drug use - e.g. marijuana, heroin
* Allergy to morphine
* Intrapartum or postpartum fever ≥ 38 ° C
* Coagulopathy
* Accidental removal of the epidural or intrathecal catheter
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Montefiore Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rutgers University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Richard M. Smiley

Professor of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Smiley, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rutgers Health University Hospital

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Weill Cornell Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Presbyterian Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Al-metwalli RR. Epidural morphine injections for prevention of post dural puncture headache. Anaesthesia. 2008 Aug;63(8):847-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05494.x. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18547293 (View on PubMed)

Scavone BM, Wong CA, Sullivan JT, Yaghmour E, Sherwani SS, McCarthy RJ. Efficacy of a prophylactic epidural blood patch in preventing post dural puncture headache in parturients after inadvertent dural puncture. Anesthesiology. 2004 Dec;101(6):1422-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200412000-00024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15564951 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAP4755

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.