Comparison of Epidural Fentanyl and Clonidine for Breakthrough Pain

NCT ID: NCT01846221

Last Updated: 2018-05-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-15

Study Completion Date

2017-01-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Epidural analgesia has proven to be an effective method for severe pain relief associated with labor and delivery. During labor, a low dose continuous infusion of local anesthetic and narcotic will be administered through an epidural catheter. As labor progresses and the baby's head makes it way through the pelvis, breakthrough pain may emerge and often needs further treatment. The investigators provide pain relief by administering analgesics through the epidural catheter. The patients will be randomly assigned to receive one of two medication mixtures believed to be successful in treating this type of pain associated with advanced labor. After this initial treatment, if pain relief is not attained, the patient may receive the other medication as well. The medications used in this study have been used at this institution for some time and have been found to be safe for mother and baby. The opioid (fentanyl) dose is small and only a small fraction will be transmitted to the baby. The other medication (clonidine) better known as a blood pressure medication has also been used for pain relief. Studies and clinical experience have shown that clonidine when given epidurally in the doses used in this study has minimal, if any effect, on the blood pressure of the mother or of the baby. The investigators will record medical and obstetric history and labor progress relevant to the patient. The patient will be asked questions regarding labor pain and side effects before and after the analgesic is administered. The primary objective is to determine which treatment regimen is more successful in abolishing breakthrough pain in advanced labor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Epidural analgesia is a popular choice among patients for relief of severe pain associated with labor and delivery. Currently, at the investigators' institution the investigators use a continuous infusion of low dose local anesthetic and narcotic (12 ml/hr of 0.0625% bupivacaine with 2 micrograms/ml fentanyl) after the initial spinal or epidural dose to maintain patient comfort until delivery. This dose of the infusion is chosen because it often provides adequate comfort without interfering with the mobility of the patient and her ability to effectively push during delivery. However, this low-dose epidural infusion strategy often results in recurrence of pain after an initial pain-free period. This recurring pain is known as breakthrough pain and is alleviated by administering small boluses of analgesics via the epidural catheter.

The pain occurring in labor is initially of visceral origin and is mediated by pain fibers originating from the low thoracic and upper lumbar segments of the spinal cord. As labor progresses to the late first phase (also known as transitional stage), pain sensations originating from the distension of the pelvic floor, vagina and perineum adds a somatic component to labor pain. This type of breakthrough pain, mediated by nerve fibers originating from the sacral nerves at dermatomes S2-S4, is often difficult to treat. Patients may experience inadequate analgesia even after boluses of analgesics are administered. Inadequate analgesia is deleterious due to subjective discomfort with its associated neurohumoral and physiological changes, and can be an initiator of the urge to bear down (push). Pushing before complete dilation of the cervix may lead to swelling, cervical injury and premature exhaustion of the mother. Adequate pain control will allow the cervix to fully dilate and motivate the mother to push effectively at the appropriate time. Although requests from patients to alleviate late stage breakthrough pain are common, there are no established data in the literature regarding the most effective strategy for pain management in this stage of labor.

This study is designed to compare the efficacy of two treatments for controlling late first stage breakthrough pain during labor: clonidine-bupivacaine versus fentanyl-bupivacaine. Both strategies are used at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) in this clinical situation, and there is no clear evidence whether one is superior.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labor Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Subjects will randomly receive either a mixture of 100 mcg of clonidine and 12.5 mg of bupivacaine for a total volume of 10 ml ("CLON" group) and the other group will receive 100 mcg of fentanyl and 12.5 mg of bupivacaine for a total volume of 10 ml ("FENT" group). If the treatment is declared a failure, the patient will receive the alternative of the initial treatment.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Group assignment will be performed by opening a previously prepared numbered opaque envelope containing the assignment "CLO" or "FENT". The investigator preparing the study drug will not reveal the group assignment. The investigator administering the drug (different from the investigator preparing the drug) and assessing the outcomes will be blinded to the group assignment. The participant will also be blinded to the group assignment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clonidine

Participants randomized to this arm of the study receive 100 micrograms clonidine with the bupivacaine in their epidural when requesting pain relief in advanced labor

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clonidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects randomized to clonidine will receive a mixture of 100 micrograms clonidine and 12.5 mg bupivacaine 10 ml of volume.

Fentanyl

Participants randomized to this arm of study will receive 100 mcg fentanyl with the bupivacaine in their epidural when requesting pain relief in advanced labor

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects randomized to fentanyl will receive 100 mcg fentanyl and 12.5 mg bupivacaine in 10 ml of volume.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clonidine

Subjects randomized to clonidine will receive a mixture of 100 micrograms clonidine and 12.5 mg bupivacaine 10 ml of volume.

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl

Subjects randomized to fentanyl will receive 100 mcg fentanyl and 12.5 mg bupivacaine in 10 ml of volume.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DuraClon Sublimaze

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* women in labor at term pregnancy
* healthy
* epidural analgesia in place
* breakthrough pain in advanced labor

Exclusion Criteria

* chronic pain syndrome
* receiving systemic opioids within 4 hours
* receiving chronic antidepressants, clonidine, opioids
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Columbia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Allison Lee

Assistant Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allison Lee, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.asaabstracts.com/strands/asaabstracts/abstract.htm?year=2017&index=14&absnum=4456

The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Abstract

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAAL4101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.