Optimal Bupivacaine Dose for Initiation of Labor Epidural Techniques

NCT ID: NCT04814537

Last Updated: 2022-08-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-25

Study Completion Date

2022-03-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To estimate the dose of bupivacaine required to achieve initial effective comfort in 90% of patients (ED90) via the epidural (DPE or EPL) technique in women undergoing labor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objective of our study is to use a biased coin up-down allocation methodology to estimate the dose of bupivacaine required to achieve initial effective comfort in 90% of patients (ED90) via the epidural (DPE or EPL) technique in women undergoing labor induction or augmentation; we hypothesize that we will be able to determine the ED90 of bupivacaine for each technique with adequate precision to inform the optimal doses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labor Pain Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized Controlled Trial Using Biased Coin Design to Determine Effective Dose for 90% (ED90) of Subjects
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
The biased-coin allocation after each successful response will be implemented by flipping a virtual biased coin (10% vs. 90% probability of randomizing the next patient to the lower vs. same dose than received by the last patient with the same epidural technique) using R statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Care Provider (Clinical Anesthesiologist) will administer the identified dose, then summon blinded observer.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique

Laboring women receiving the Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) Technique with dose of Bupivacaine 0.25% diluted to 20 mL with isotonic sterile 0.9% saline. The first subject in the DPE group will receive an initial dose of bupivacaine 25 mg, with an endpoint being the achievement of an NRS \< 3 at 30 min. Subsequent patients are administered bupivacaine doses determined by the response of the previous subject, as per the biased coin method. The subsequent up and down interval doses are bupivacaine 2.5 mg (1 mL) increments, with an anticipated dose range from 20 mg to 40 mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Local Anesthetic Agent

Epidural Technique

Laboring women receiving the Conventional Epidural Technique (EPL) with dose of Bupivacaine 0.25% diluted to 20 mL with isotonic sterile 0.9% saline. The first subject in the EPL group will receive an initial dose of bupivacaine 25 mg, with an endpoint being the achievement of an NRS \< 3 at 30 min. Subsequent patients are administered bupivacaine doses determined by the response of the previous subject, as per the biased coin method. The subsequent up and down interval doses are bupivacaine 2.5 mg (1 mL) increments, with an anticipated dose range from 20 mg to 40 mg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Local Anesthetic Agent

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride

Local Anesthetic Agent

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Marcaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Parturient with no major co-morbidities
2. Singleton, vertex gestation at term (37-42 weeks)
3. Less than or equal to 5 cm dilation
4. Desire to receive epidural labor analgesia
5. Numerical Rating Scale greater or equal to 5 (NRS 0-10, where 0 = no pain, and 10 = worst pain imaginable), at time of epidural labor analgesia request.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Current or historical evidence of clinically significant disease or condition, including diseases of pregnancy (i.e preeclampsia, gestational diabetes)
2. Any contraindication to the administration of an epidural technique
3. History of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to an amide local anesthetic agent
4. Current or historical evidence of a disease which may result in the risk of a cesarean delivery (i.e. history of uterine rupture). NB: Exception-trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) will be eligible.
5. Evidence of anticipated fetal anomalies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lawrence Ching Tsen

Associate Professor of Anesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lawrence Tsen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor in Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ngan Kee WD, Ng FF, Khaw KS, Lee A, Gin T. Determination and comparison of graded dose-response curves for epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in laboring nulliparous women. Anesthesiology. 2010 Aug;113(2):445-53. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181bdf9da.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20613484 (View on PubMed)

Benhamou D, Ghosh C, Mercier FJ. A randomized sequential allocation study to determine the minimum effective analgesic concentration of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients receiving epidural analgesia for labor. Anesthesiology. 2003 Dec;99(6):1383-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200312000-00022.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14639153 (View on PubMed)

Chau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC, Elterman KG, Cappiello EC, Robinson JN, Tsen LC. Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28067707 (View on PubMed)

Maeda A, Villela-Franyutti D, Lumbreras-Marquez MI, Murthy A, Fields KG, Justice S, Tsen LC. Labor Analgesia Initiation With Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Biased-Coin Sequential Allocation Trial to Determine the Effective Dose for 90% of Patients of Bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2024 Jun 1;138(6):1205-1214. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006691. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37824436 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020P003241

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.