Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin+Cytarabine vs Idarubicin+Cytarabine in Elderly Patients With AML.Mylofrance 4

NCT ID: NCT02473146

Last Updated: 2024-02-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

225 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-18

Study Completion Date

2023-09-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose : The main objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of the addition of repeated doses of low doses (3mg/m2) of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) in addition with standard doses of Ara-C in previously untreated patients aged 60 to 80 years with de novo acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) and non adverse cytogenetics. The main end point for efficacy is 2 years-event free survival. The secondary efficacy endpoints are CR/Cri rates, cumulative incidence of relapse and overall survival. The secondary endpoints for safety are early death rate (before day 30 and 60), grade 3 to 5 adverse events and severe adverse events, cardiac toxicity and quality of life. Additional secondary endpoints are treatment by covariate interactions with respect to biological characteristics present at diagnosis (CD33 positivity, cytogenetic, molecular abnormalities) or after treatment (Minimal residual disease levels). This study is an exploratory study. Patients will be allocated at inclusion with a 2/1 ratio either to receive treatment with GO and cytarabine or Idarubicin and cytarabine in a 3+7 regimen similar to the "backbone" ALFA 1200 scheme used concurrently by the ALFA group as treatment of AML patients aged \>60 years.

Primary objective. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of two doses of Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during induction and one dose of GO during first consolidation in combination with Cytarabine in elderly patients with AML in the non adverse cytogenetics-risk group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mylotarg Arm

After randomization patients in the experimental arm are assigned to receive chemotherapy with:

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin 3 mg/m2 (maximum dose: 5 mg) per IV, 60mn on Day 1 and 4 Cytarabine 200 mg/m2 per CIV over 24h on Day 1 to 7

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO)

Intervention Type DRUG

Control Arm

After randomization patients in the control arm are assigned to receive chemotherapy with Idarubicin 12mg/m2 per IV, 30mn on Day 1,2,3 Cytarabine 200 mg/m2 per CIV over 24h on Day 1 to 7

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Mylotarg

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a morphologically proven diagnosis AML and both the following criteria:
* Age ≥ 60 years and \< 80 years.
* Not previously treated for their disease.
* With favourable or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. (Patients with urgent clinical need to begin treatment might be included before cytogenetic results, when necessary if they do not respond to Hydroxyurea. Patients might be included if the cytogenetic results are not expected in a time limit \< 5 days after AML diagnosis).
* Fit to receive intensive chemotherapy
* Cardiac function determined by radionucleide or echography within normal limits.
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* M3-AML
* Presence of adverse cytogenetics (according to European LeukemiaNet recommendation.) (17) defined as one of the following abnormalities: -5/5q-, -7, t(6;9), t(v;11q23) excluding t(9;11), inv(3)(q21;q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), complex karyotype (3+ abnormalities)
* Secondary AML following treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
* AML following previously known myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndrome.
* ECOG performance status (PS) 0 to 3
* Serum creatinin level \> or = 2.5N; AST and ALT level \> or = 2.5N; total bilirubin level \> or = 2N
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Versailles Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ms Juliette LAMBERT

Clinical coordinator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Juliette LAMBERT, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Versailles Hospital

Sylvie CASTAIGNE, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Versailles Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

C.H.U d'Amiens - Hôpital Sud

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Hôpital V. Dupouy

Argenteuil, , France

Site Status

CH Avicenne

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

CHU Caen

Caen, , France

Site Status

HIA Percy

Clamart, , France

Site Status

Hopital Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

CHU Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CH Dunkerque

Dunkirk, , France

Site Status

CH Versailles

Le Chesnay, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Huriez, CHU de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

CHU Limoges

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Hôpital de la Conception

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Centre Antoine Lacassagne

Nice, , France

Site Status

CHU d'Orléans

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Hopital Necker

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital St Louis

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Antoine

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Centre H Becquerel

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

IGR

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-001395-65

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.