Efficacy of Gemtuzumab Ozogamycin for Patients Presenting an Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With Intermediate Risk

NCT ID: NCT00860639

Last Updated: 2017-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

327 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of the study is to improve outcome of younger patients (between 18-60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia and intermediate risk defined by the cytogenetics. In this population, in the absence of bone marrow transplantation, event free survival (EFS) is estimated at 35% after three years of follow-up. Adjunction of gemtuzumab ozogamycin (MYLOTARG®) to standard chemotherapy is supposed to increase EFS up to 50% at 3 years. To test this hypothesis, the Groupe Ouest Est d'Etude des Leucémies et Autres Maladies du Sang (GOELAMS ) sponsored by Nantes University Hospital leads this randomized open phase III trial in 29 French centers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Initial randomization will be completed upon receipt of karyotype results and will determine the administration of gemtuzumab ozogamycin (MYLOTARG ®) in combination with chemotherapy during the induction course and the first intensive consolidation course. The induction course include: Daunorubicin for 3 days (60mg/m²) associated with cytarabine (200mg/m²) for 7 days. The MYLOTARG ® will be administered according to the randomization arm on the 4th day of treatment by slow intravenous infusion of 2 hours at a dose of 6 mg/m2. Early bone marrow assessment will be performed at D15. In case of blast excess (\>5%) , a second course of induction will be administered.

The consolidation treatment depends on age, molecular prognostic factors, and donor availability:

* Patients with good molecular prognosis profile \[ NPM1 + / FLT3 ITD - or CEBPa mutated \] will be consolidated by two courses of intensive chemotherapy comprising Mitoxanthrone and intermediate dose of Cytarabine with or without MYLOTARG ® according to the initial randomization during the first course.
* Patients younger than 51 years, eligible for standard allogeneic transplantation with sibling or full matched unrelated donor will receive a standard bone marrow transplantation which not begin before 90 days after the induction.
* Patients with no donor or older than 50 years, or with a donor being identified, will receive two courses of intensive consolidation comprising Mitoxantrone and intermediate-dose of Cytarabine with or without Mylotarg ® 6 mg / m² during the first consolidation according to the randomisation arm.
* Patients aged 51 to 60 years with an HLA identical donor (sibling or unrelated), will receive a non-myeloablative haematopoietic stem cells transplant (HSCT) after the second course of consolidation.
* For other patients, an autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplant (HSCT) will be performed after the 2nd course of consolidation. Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) will be performed after the first consolidation course and a second collection may be considered after the second consolidation course in case of inadequate collection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

gemtuzumab ozogamycin

Initial randomization will be completed upon receipt of karyotype results and will determine the administration of gemtuzumab ozogamycin (MYLOTARG ®) in combination with chemotherapy during the induction course and the first intensive consolidation course.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

gemtuzumab ozogamycin

Intervention Type DRUG

gemtuzumab ozogamycin = 6mg/m² during the induction course (Day 4) gemtuzumab ozogamycin = 6mg/m² during the first intensive consolidation course (Day 4)

without Mylotarg

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

gemtuzumab ozogamycin

gemtuzumab ozogamycin = 6mg/m² during the induction course (Day 4) gemtuzumab ozogamycin = 6mg/m² during the first intensive consolidation course (Day 4)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

gemtuzumab ozogamycin (MYLOTARG ®)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients with de novo AML and intermediate risk as defined by the cytogenetics criteria of GOELAMS Group:

* Normal karyotype or
* Karyotype with other abnormalities, excluding the favourable group \[t (15; 17), t (8; 21), inv (16)\] and the high risk group \[(-5/5q-, -7/7q- , t (9.22), t (6.9), 11q23 anomaly excluding the t (9; 11), abnormal 3q, complex karyotype (\> 3 abnormalities)\]. Not previously treated for AML.
* Patients aged 18 to 60 years
* And having more than 20% of blast cells in bone marrow and as previously described.
* And with intermediate cytogenetics as previously defined
* And whose expression of the CD33 antigen on the blasts was defined using standard method
* And with a WBC \<or equal to 100G/L.
* And who can receive either one or the other of the treatments under study
* And having a good performance status (WHO score \<3) with a life expectancy greater than one month.
* Affiliated with the Social Security

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients aged under 18 or over 60 years
* OR with AML:

* Not classifiable in the classification French-American-British (FAB)
* Type M3
* Or blastic transformation of a myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndrome previously diagnosed
* Outside the intermediate cytogenetic group as previously defined
* OR with isolated extramedullary localization of their disease
* OR WBC\> 100G / L
* Patients with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or human T-lymphotrophic virus 1 (HTLV-1)
* Patients with SGOT/SGPT \>5N
* Patients with a calculated creatinine clearance of \<50 mL/min
* Informed consent refusal
* Pregnant and/or lactating female
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chugai Pharmaceutical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

French Innovative Leukemia Organisation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nantes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jacques Delaunay, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nantes University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CH Pays d'Aix

Aix, , France

Site Status

CHU Amiens

Amiens, , France

Site Status

CHRU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

CH Avignon

Avignon, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque

Bayonne, , France

Site Status

CHU Hôpital Minjoz

Besançon, , France

Site Status

CHU Morvan

Brest, , France

Site Status

CHU Hôtel Dieu

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

CH Louis Pasteur

Colmar, , France

Site Status

CHU du Bocage

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CHU Michallon

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CHU Dupuytren

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Institut Paoli Calmette

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CH Metz Thionvile

Metz, , France

Site Status

CHU Lapeyronie

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CH Muller

Mulhouse, , France

Site Status

CHU Hôtel Dieu

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CHU Carémeau

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

CH La Source

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Hopital Cochin (AP-HP)

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU du Haut Lévèque

Pessac, , France

Site Status

CHU Jean Bernard - La Milétrie

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

CHU Robert Debré

Reims, , France

Site Status

CHU Pontchaillou

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire

Saint-Etienne, , France

Site Status

CHU Hautepierre

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

CHU Purpan

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHU Bretonneau

Tours, , France

Site Status

CHU Brabois

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BRD/06/10-I

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.