Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in Oncology Patients

NCT ID: NCT02471885

Last Updated: 2020-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-12-16

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cancer survival has improved steadily due to earlier detection and treatment. Despite the established efficacy of anthracycline chemotherapy, its damaging effects on the heart (cardiotoxicity) limits treatment and confers acute and long term adverse cardiovascular consequences. Protective strategies for the heart (cardioprotection) with iron binders (chelation), heart rate (beta blockade) and blood pressure (renin angiotensin inhibition) medications have demonstrated promise in adult cancer patients, but these treatments are typically prescribed only after significant changes in heart chamber size and pumping ability are detected by imaging investigations (myocardial dysfunction).

Furthermore, these conventional therapies are constrained by important side effects that affect bone marrow, blood pressure, and the kidneys.

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) protects the heart by activating cell survival pathways through brief repeated inflations and deflations of a blood pressure cuff to limit blood flow temporarily (noninjurious ischaemia). These innate survival mechanisms prevent part of the cellular injury that occurs during the ischaemia reperfusion cascade during a heart attack (myocardial infarction). Ischaemia reperfusion injury also shares common biochemical pathways with anthracycline cardiotoxicity, and thus RIC may be a novel form of nonpharmacological cardioprotection that can be applied when undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy.

The investigators propose a pilot single centre randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of RIC on reducing heart muscle damage (myocardial injury) in anthracycline-treated cancer patients. The investigators will assess subclinical myocardial injury using high-sensitivity blood tests (troponin T levels) and advanced imaging techniques, monitor heart rhythm disturbances (cardiac arrhythmia) and analyse metabolic changes in urine and blood during chemotherapy, at specified time points, and follow up to 5 years after completing chemotherapy treatment).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This pilot study aims to demonstrate whether remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIC), delivered as a nonpharmacological treatment via repeated inflations and deflations of a limb blood pressure cuff, can reduce subclinical myocardial injury from anthracycline chemotherapy. Chemotherapy cardiotoxicity is the dose limiting constraint in anthracycline chemotherapy regimens, and conventional drug treatments to prevent and treat it are limited by important interactions with blood pressure, kidney function or bone marrow function. The lifetime cancer risk is between 1 in 2 and 1 in 3 in the general population. Cancer treatment and survival has improved steadily 50% of patients now survive their initial cancer diagnosis, but approximately 25 to 50% of survivors will have abnormal cardiac function over the next twenty years. Historically, anthracycline chemotherapy dosing has been stratified to limit the incidence of clinical heart failure to around 5%. More recent studies have reported at least one third of anthracycline chemotherapy patients demonstrate a significant rise in Troponin levels as a blood biomarker of subclinical myocardial injury as well as documented evidence of biomarker rise even after a single cycle of chemotherapy, and thus the absolute threshold for myocardial injury may be lower and thus more prevalent than these conservative figures.

In standard dosing regimens, chemotherapy may be delayed or suspended in cancer patients based on the simplified measure of ejection fraction (EF) as a measure of cardiac systolic function. Conventional heart failure treatments such as betablockers or ACE inhibitors are usually prescribed only after a significant fall in EF, even though myocardial injury occurs long before this imprecise measurement changes. RIC has been shown to reduce myocardial injury and improve outcomes in elective and emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The common biochemical pathways in ischaemia reperfusion and anthracycline-induced cardiac myocyte injury suggest that RIC may be an unexplored nonpharmacological treatment to reduce myocardial injury for cancer patients.

This pilot study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of RIC as an elegant noninvasive, nonmedicinal treatment to reduce myocardial injury in cancer patients, and therefore poses no significant ethical issues. RIC is known to be a safe intervention with no known significant adverse effects. Some patients have reported mild discomfort during cuff inflation. A small number have experienced minor skin bruising at the cuff site which is transient. There are no known long term adverse effects of RIC,

Recruitment Patients will be identified by their usual oncology team, and referred to the cardiology team based solely on known inclusion and exclusion criteria, which will ensure this process is free from undue influence.

The benefits of the study include an increase in the scientific understanding of how RIC may lead to a reduction in myocardial injury, as well as longitudinal documentation of myocardial injury in the form of blood biomarkers, ECG changes, metabolic changes, and novel imaging markers in cancer patients undergoing a common form of chemotherapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiotoxicity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Remote ischaemic conditioning

Remote ischaemic conditioning in the form of a blood pressure cuff on upper arm inflated upto 200 mm Hg (or systolic BP + 20 mm Hg if low platelets e.g. 50-150 x10\^9/L, skip remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) if platelets \< 50 x 10\^9/L) for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes, for 4 cycles before beginning of chemotherapy infusion. The entire pre-conditioning phase will last 40 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Remote Ischaemic Conditioning

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

each cycle of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning (RIC) consists of inflating a blood pressure cuff on the upper limb (arm) upto 200mm Hg (systolic BP + 20 mm Hg for low platelets, e.g. 50-150 x 10\^9/L; skip RIC if platelets \< 50 x 10\^9/L) for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes.

Control

Blood pressure cuff on upper arm inflated to 10 mm Hg for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes, for 4 cycles before beginning of chemotherapy infusion. The entire control comparator will last 40 minutes

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Sham control blood pressure cuff placement at 10 mm Hg for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Remote Ischaemic Conditioning

each cycle of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning (RIC) consists of inflating a blood pressure cuff on the upper limb (arm) upto 200mm Hg (systolic BP + 20 mm Hg for low platelets, e.g. 50-150 x 10\^9/L; skip RIC if platelets \< 50 x 10\^9/L) for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Placebo

Sham control blood pressure cuff placement at 10 mm Hg for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Remote Ischaemic PreConditioning Remote Ischemic Conditioning Sham

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult or teenage young adult cancer patients with capacity
* Anthracycline-regimen chemotherapy (de novo or re-challenge)
* Able to tolerate peripheral blood pressure arm cuff inflation

Exclusion Criteria

* Recent myocardial infarction in previous 4 weeks
* previous diagnosis of dilated, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, amyloid or Anderson-Fabry Disease
* peripheral vascular disease
* Chronic Kidney Disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30 ml/min)
* Taking sulphonylureas
* lymph node dissection patients will need BP cuff on contra-lateral arm
* Skip remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) cycle if very low platelets (e.g. platelets \< 50 x 10\^9/L, can have RIC when platelet counts recover, as per protocol).
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University College London Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Derek M Yellon, PhD FACC FAHA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University College, London

Malcolm Walker, MD FRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University College London Hospitals

Alison Macklin

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University College London Hospitals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University College London Hospitals

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Robin Chung, MBBS MRCP

Role: CONTACT

02034479880

Michael Mallouppas, MBBS MRCP

Role: CONTACT

02034479880

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Robin Chung, MBBS MRCP

Role: primary

02034479880

Michael Mallouppas, MRCP

Role: backup

02034479880 ext. 02034479880

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Candilio L, Malik A, Ariti C, Barnard M, Di Salvo C, Lawrence D, Hayward M, Yap J, Roberts N, Sheikh A, Kolvekar S, Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Heart. 2015 Feb;101(3):185-92. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306178. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25252696 (View on PubMed)

White SK, Frohlich GM, Sado DM, Maestrini V, Fontana M, Treibel TA, Tehrani S, Flett AS, Meier P, Ariti C, Davies JR, Moon JC, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Remote ischemic conditioning reduces myocardial infarct size and edema in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):178-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Sep 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25240548 (View on PubMed)

Sloth AD, Schmidt MR, Munk K, Kharbanda RK, Redington AN, Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT, Botker HE; CONDI Investigators. Improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(3):168-75. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht369. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24031025 (View on PubMed)

Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, Bottcher M, Kaltoft AK, Terkelsen CJ, Munk K, Andersen NH, Hansen TM, Trautner S, Lassen JF, Christiansen EH, Krusell LR, Kristensen SD, Thuesen L, Nielsen SS, Rehling M, Sorensen HT, Redington AN, Nielsen TT. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):727-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62001-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20189026 (View on PubMed)

Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, Harris J, Barnard M, Grundy E, Ashley E, Vichare S, Di Salvo C, Kolvekar S, Hayward M, Keogh B, MacAllister RJ, Yellon DM. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Aug 18;370(9587):575-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61296-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17707752 (View on PubMed)

Davies WR, Brown AJ, Watson W, McCormick LM, West NE, Dutka DP, Hoole SP. Remote ischemic preconditioning improves outcome at 6 years after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: the CRISP stent trial long-term follow-up. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun;6(3):246-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000184. Epub 2013 May 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23696599 (View on PubMed)

Mallouppas M, Chung R, Ghosh AK, Macklin A, Yellon DM, Walker JM. Anthracyclines and Biomarkers of Myocardial Injury: The Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning. JACC CardioOncol. 2023 May 2;5(3):343-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.03.008. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37397080 (View on PubMed)

Chung R, Maulik A, Hamarneh A, Hochhauser D, Hausenloy DJ, Walker JM, Yellon DM. Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in Oncology Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: Rationale and Design of the ERIC-ONC Study--A Single-Center, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Cardiol. 2016 Feb;39(2):72-82. doi: 10.1002/clc.22507. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26807534 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.hatter-cardiovascular-institute.co.uk/

Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, UCL

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15/0276

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.