Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in Oncology Patients
NCT ID: NCT02471885
Last Updated: 2020-04-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
128 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-16
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Furthermore, these conventional therapies are constrained by important side effects that affect bone marrow, blood pressure, and the kidneys.
Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) protects the heart by activating cell survival pathways through brief repeated inflations and deflations of a blood pressure cuff to limit blood flow temporarily (noninjurious ischaemia). These innate survival mechanisms prevent part of the cellular injury that occurs during the ischaemia reperfusion cascade during a heart attack (myocardial infarction). Ischaemia reperfusion injury also shares common biochemical pathways with anthracycline cardiotoxicity, and thus RIC may be a novel form of nonpharmacological cardioprotection that can be applied when undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy.
The investigators propose a pilot single centre randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of RIC on reducing heart muscle damage (myocardial injury) in anthracycline-treated cancer patients. The investigators will assess subclinical myocardial injury using high-sensitivity blood tests (troponin T levels) and advanced imaging techniques, monitor heart rhythm disturbances (cardiac arrhythmia) and analyse metabolic changes in urine and blood during chemotherapy, at specified time points, and follow up to 5 years after completing chemotherapy treatment).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Oncology
NCT04805346
Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy With Concomitant Chemotherapy for NSCLC
NCT02367443
Radiation in Stage I or Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
NCT00346320
Effects of VNS on RT-induced Inflammation and Prognosis of Patients With NSCLC
NCT03553485
Dose De-escalation to the Elective Nodal Sites in Head and Neck Cancer
NCT01812486
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In standard dosing regimens, chemotherapy may be delayed or suspended in cancer patients based on the simplified measure of ejection fraction (EF) as a measure of cardiac systolic function. Conventional heart failure treatments such as betablockers or ACE inhibitors are usually prescribed only after a significant fall in EF, even though myocardial injury occurs long before this imprecise measurement changes. RIC has been shown to reduce myocardial injury and improve outcomes in elective and emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The common biochemical pathways in ischaemia reperfusion and anthracycline-induced cardiac myocyte injury suggest that RIC may be an unexplored nonpharmacological treatment to reduce myocardial injury for cancer patients.
This pilot study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of RIC as an elegant noninvasive, nonmedicinal treatment to reduce myocardial injury in cancer patients, and therefore poses no significant ethical issues. RIC is known to be a safe intervention with no known significant adverse effects. Some patients have reported mild discomfort during cuff inflation. A small number have experienced minor skin bruising at the cuff site which is transient. There are no known long term adverse effects of RIC,
Recruitment Patients will be identified by their usual oncology team, and referred to the cardiology team based solely on known inclusion and exclusion criteria, which will ensure this process is free from undue influence.
The benefits of the study include an increase in the scientific understanding of how RIC may lead to a reduction in myocardial injury, as well as longitudinal documentation of myocardial injury in the form of blood biomarkers, ECG changes, metabolic changes, and novel imaging markers in cancer patients undergoing a common form of chemotherapy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Remote ischaemic conditioning
Remote ischaemic conditioning in the form of a blood pressure cuff on upper arm inflated upto 200 mm Hg (or systolic BP + 20 mm Hg if low platelets e.g. 50-150 x10\^9/L, skip remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) if platelets \< 50 x 10\^9/L) for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes, for 4 cycles before beginning of chemotherapy infusion. The entire pre-conditioning phase will last 40 minutes.
Remote Ischaemic Conditioning
each cycle of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning (RIC) consists of inflating a blood pressure cuff on the upper limb (arm) upto 200mm Hg (systolic BP + 20 mm Hg for low platelets, e.g. 50-150 x 10\^9/L; skip RIC if platelets \< 50 x 10\^9/L) for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes.
Control
Blood pressure cuff on upper arm inflated to 10 mm Hg for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes, for 4 cycles before beginning of chemotherapy infusion. The entire control comparator will last 40 minutes
Placebo
Sham control blood pressure cuff placement at 10 mm Hg for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Remote Ischaemic Conditioning
each cycle of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning (RIC) consists of inflating a blood pressure cuff on the upper limb (arm) upto 200mm Hg (systolic BP + 20 mm Hg for low platelets, e.g. 50-150 x 10\^9/L; skip RIC if platelets \< 50 x 10\^9/L) for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes.
Placebo
Sham control blood pressure cuff placement at 10 mm Hg for 5 minutes, then deflated to 0 mm Hg for 5 minutes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Anthracycline-regimen chemotherapy (de novo or re-challenge)
* Able to tolerate peripheral blood pressure arm cuff inflation
Exclusion Criteria
* previous diagnosis of dilated, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, amyloid or Anderson-Fabry Disease
* peripheral vascular disease
* Chronic Kidney Disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 30 ml/min)
* Taking sulphonylureas
* lymph node dissection patients will need BP cuff on contra-lateral arm
* Skip remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) cycle if very low platelets (e.g. platelets \< 50 x 10\^9/L, can have RIC when platelet counts recover, as per protocol).
16 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University College London Hospitals
OTHER
University College, London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Derek M Yellon, PhD FACC FAHA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University College, London
Malcolm Walker, MD FRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University College London Hospitals
Alison Macklin
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University College London Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University College London Hospitals
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Candilio L, Malik A, Ariti C, Barnard M, Di Salvo C, Lawrence D, Hayward M, Yap J, Roberts N, Sheikh A, Kolvekar S, Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Heart. 2015 Feb;101(3):185-92. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306178. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
White SK, Frohlich GM, Sado DM, Maestrini V, Fontana M, Treibel TA, Tehrani S, Flett AS, Meier P, Ariti C, Davies JR, Moon JC, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ. Remote ischemic conditioning reduces myocardial infarct size and edema in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):178-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
Sloth AD, Schmidt MR, Munk K, Kharbanda RK, Redington AN, Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT, Botker HE; CONDI Investigators. Improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(3):168-75. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht369. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, Bottcher M, Kaltoft AK, Terkelsen CJ, Munk K, Andersen NH, Hansen TM, Trautner S, Lassen JF, Christiansen EH, Krusell LR, Kristensen SD, Thuesen L, Nielsen SS, Rehling M, Sorensen HT, Redington AN, Nielsen TT. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 27;375(9716):727-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62001-8.
Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, Harris J, Barnard M, Grundy E, Ashley E, Vichare S, Di Salvo C, Kolvekar S, Hayward M, Keogh B, MacAllister RJ, Yellon DM. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Aug 18;370(9587):575-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61296-3.
Davies WR, Brown AJ, Watson W, McCormick LM, West NE, Dutka DP, Hoole SP. Remote ischemic preconditioning improves outcome at 6 years after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: the CRISP stent trial long-term follow-up. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun;6(3):246-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000184. Epub 2013 May 21.
Mallouppas M, Chung R, Ghosh AK, Macklin A, Yellon DM, Walker JM. Anthracyclines and Biomarkers of Myocardial Injury: The Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning. JACC CardioOncol. 2023 May 2;5(3):343-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.03.008. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Chung R, Maulik A, Hamarneh A, Hochhauser D, Hausenloy DJ, Walker JM, Yellon DM. Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning in Oncology Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: Rationale and Design of the ERIC-ONC Study--A Single-Center, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Cardiol. 2016 Feb;39(2):72-82. doi: 10.1002/clc.22507. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, UCL
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15/0276
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.