Detecting Radiation-Induced Cardiac Toxicity After Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiotherapy

NCT ID: NCT03416972

Last Updated: 2018-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-11

Study Completion Date

2020-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in Canada. For approximately 30% of patients that present with locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the standard treatment is curative-intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Outcomes remain poor, with 5-year survival of only 20%. Despite the long-held belief that higher radiation doses lead to improved overall survival (OS), the landmark randomized trial (RTOG 0617) showed the opposite. The investigators hypothesize that the inferior survival observed may be due to unexpected heart toxicity as secondary analysis revealed that the heart dose was a strong predictor of inferior OS. Up to now, change in heart function is typically detected histologically, requiring autopsy tissue. Therefore, a non-invasive marker of early heart damage is required. Hybrid PET-MRI has become available in Canada only recently. The ability to simultaneously perform metabolic imaging with functional and tissue imaging allows for novel assessment of heart toxicity. The primary objective is to examine the utility of hybrid PET-MRI and DCE-CT to assess acute changes in heart function and to measure inflammation before, and six weeks after NSCLC radiotherapy. A pilot of 20 patients with Stage I-III NSCLC will be enrolled. The findings of this study will aid in the design of new studies to reassess dose escalation for locally advanced NSCLC while limiting the risk of heart toxicity. FDG PET will be used to simultaneously assess both cardiac inflammation and tumour response. Quantitative DCE-CT will also be used to measure ventilation and perfusion changes in the normal lung and tumour after radiotherapy, providing image data that can comprehensively assess both tumour response and potential toxicity in both the heart and lungs. Such information is crucial in understanding the disease and its response to treatment. This data will also aid in the design of radiation techniques that spare the heart in other patients with any thoracic malignancies, including breast cancer, lymphoma, and esophageal cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators propose a longitudinal imaging pilot study composed of 20 Stage I-III NSCLC patients before, and six weeks after standard radiotherapy using a hybrid 3T-PET/MRI system (Biograph mMR, Siemens Healthcare) and a GE Revolution 256-slice CT scanner. The imaging protocol is designed to detect acute changes in myocardial perfusion, inflammation, edema, left ventricular ejection fraction, normal lung and tumour perfusion, and tumour metabolism. During each imaging session, patients will receive an 18F-FDG PET scan to image macrophage-related inflammation and tumour metabolism, MRI to identify edema, mature fibrosis or scar, and Dynamic contrast enhanced CT (DCE-CT) imaging to image perfusion and (LVEF). All images will be fused and rendered with radiation treatment planning dose distributions. Parameters such as Standard Uptake Value (SUV) will be used to compare PET scans, while heart volume and presence of Gadolinium enhancement will be used to compare MRI scans. Blood flow, blood volume, and permeability will be used to compare CT scans. Blood tests including Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), high sensitivity C-reactive protein, and troponin at each timepoint will also be performed to detect cardiac inflammation. Comparisons between Stage I/II and Stage III patients will allow us to determine whether our metrics for heart changes is radiation related. Relative differences from the six-week time point to baseline will be correlated with the radiation dose distribution to attempt to define a dose-response relationship between radiation dose and cardiac toxicity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Radiation Toxicity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stage I-III NSCLC patients

Stage I/II NSCLC patients receiving standard stereotactic body radiation therapy and Stage III patients receiving Standard platinum-based chemoradiotherapy will receive PET/MRI, DCE-CT, ECG/EKG, and bloodwork before and six weeks post treatment.

Standard platinum-based chemoradiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Stage III patients: Standard platinum-based chemotherapy, total radiation dose 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Stage I/II patients: Standard radiotherapy, total radiation dose of 54 Gy in 3 fractions (peripheral), 55 Gy in 5 fractions (near chest wall), or 60 Gy in 8 fractions (central).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard platinum-based chemoradiotherapy

Stage III patients: Standard platinum-based chemotherapy, total radiation dose 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Stage I/II patients: Standard radiotherapy, total radiation dose of 54 Gy in 3 fractions (peripheral), 55 Gy in 5 fractions (near chest wall), or 60 Gy in 8 fractions (central).

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 or older
* Ability to provide informed consent
* Histologically confirmed carcinoma of the lung
* Stage I-III NSCLC
* Stage I-II patients to receive 54 Gy in 3 fractions, 55 Gy in 5 fractions, or 60 Gy in 8 fractions (treated every other day)
* Stage III patient to receive concurrent chemoradiation ( 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions)
* No prior RT to the thorax
* ECOG performance status 0-1 within one month of accrual
* Expected lifespan at least 1 year
* Negative pregnancy test within one month of accrual if woman is premenopausal
* Patient presented at multidisciplinary tumor board or quality-assurance rounds
* Satisfactory pulmonary function tests as determined by the treating radiation oncologist (ie. FEV1 \>= 0.8 for Stage III NSCLC and no threshold for Stage I/II).

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving Prescription RT dose to anything other than LRCP standards for Stage I-III NSCLC.
* Prior history of atrial fibrillation
* Previous coronary bypass surgery
* Patients with severe reversible airways obstruction
* Patients with acute coronary syndrome (STEMI/non-STEMI and unstable angina)
* AV block without pacemaker
* Patients who are renal insufficient (eGFR \<40)
* Patients with asthma
* Allergy to iodinated contrast for scans (study subject will be eligible for non-contrast scans)
* Use of metformin-containing products less than 24 hours prior to CT contrast administration
* Other contraindications to iodinated contrast media as determined by the research team.
* Allergy to gadolinium for scans using contrast; will be eligible for non-contrast scans.
* Other contraindications to gadolinium contrast media as determined by the research team.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stewart Gaede, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lawson Health Research Institute

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Stewart Gaede, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 519-685-8600

Email: [email protected]

Anne O'Connell

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 519-685-8500

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

James Sinfield

Role: primary

Albert Gratton

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R-17-360

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id