Nutritive Efficacy and Safety of a Modified Infant Formula With a Reduced Protein Content and Improved Protein Quality

NCT ID: NCT02469402

Last Updated: 2020-06-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Formula contains significantly higher total protein concentrations than breast milk. Therefore formula-fed infants have a significantly higher total protein intake in the first few months compared to exclusively breast-fed infants.

The aim is to examine the nutritive efficacy and safety of a modified infant formula with a reduced protein content and improved protein quality in a prospective, double-blind, controled, randomized study. Primary outcome measures are weight gain and growth of young infants under 12 weeks of dietary intake of the new infant formula. Metabolic effects of the qualitative and quantitative changes in the protein content of the new formula will be recorded. Two groups of healthy bottle-fed infants will be compared. The treatment group will be fed for 3 months with an infant formula with decreased protein content. At the same time the protein body of the new formula is modified by enrichment with bovine alpha-lactalbumin.

A control group receives a isocaloric conventional infant formula and a protein body consisting of whey protein and casein in a ratio of 60:40, without specific accumulation of alpha-lactalbumin over the same time-period.

A group of breastmilk fed infants will serve as a reference group. In regular anthropometric controls growth and thriving of the study participants is documented and compared between the different groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast milk is considered the gold standard for early childhood nutrition, it is optimized in terms of ingredients to the needs of the infant in the first months of life. Formula differ in many ways in their composition to breast milk, e.g. in the structure and concentration of the protein contained.

To ensure adequate supply of the infant with all essential and semi-essential amino acids conventional infant formula contains significantly higher total protein concentrations than breast milk. Therefore formula-fed infants have a significantly higher total protein intake in the first few months compared to exclusively breast-fed infants, and individual amino acids are therefore fed in excess.

The increased intake of protein, and thus the increased intake of some insulinogenic amino acids in infancy (e.g. the branched chain amino acids leucine, isoleucine and valine), is now considered as a possible co-factor for later disposition to overweight and obesity. Breastfeeding induces slower growth of the infant and is proven to be associated with a lower risk of being overweight or obese at the time of school entry (von Kries 1999). The higher protein intake in bottle-fed babies seems to contribute significantly to the differences that can be observed in the growth behavior between breast-fed and bottle-fed children in the first years of life.

Obvious approaches to optimize infant formula are therefore the reduction of protein content, while ensuring an adequate supply of all relevant amino acids similar to breast milk.

Enrichment with alpha-lactalbumin enables the reduction of total protein content in the formula through the qualitative upgrading of the protein body and the high content of essential amino acids, thereby limiting a surplus of protein intake, but at the same time to supply adequate amounts of essential amino acids.

The aim is to examine the nutritive efficacy and safety of a modified infant formula with a reduced protein content and improved protein quality. Primary outcome measures are weight gain and growth of young infants under the 12 weeks of dietary intake of the new infant formula, and metabolic effects of the qualitative and quantitative changes in the protein content of the new formula. Two groups of healthy bottle-fed infants will be compared. The treatment group will be fed for 3 months with an infant formula with decreased protein content. At the same time the body of experimental protein infant formula was modified by enrichment with bovine alpha-lactalbumin.

A control group receives a isocaloric conventional infant formula and a protein body consisting of whey protein and casein in a ratio of 60:40, without specific accumulation of alpha-lactalbumin over the same time period.

A group of breastmilk fed infants will serve as a reference group.

In regular anthropometric controls growth and thriving of the study participants is documented and compared between the different groups. In addition, laboratory tests are carried out, which will examine the influence of diet on insulin response, protein metabolism and specific growth factors.

In a follow-up long-term effects of nutrition on body composition will be recorded by comparing body fat measurements (skinfold thickness-Calipometrie) during the first year of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Overweight

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard infant formula

Standard infant formula

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard infant formula

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Protein reduced formula

Protein reduced alpha-lactalbumin formula

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Protein reduced alpha-lactalbumin formula, with higher levels of alpha-lactalbumin

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Breast-feeding

Exclusive breast-feeding

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard infant formula

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Protein reduced alpha-lactalbumin formula, with higher levels of alpha-lactalbumin

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At the time of study enrollment apparently healthy newborns / infants without pronounced hyper- or hypotrophy (age-appropriate weight percentiles \> 3 and \< 97 according to Voigt et al.)
* Maternal decision against breastfeeding (for Formula Groups)

Exclusion Criteria

* Congenital gastrointestinal malformations, metabolic disease, chromosomal aberration, syndromic disease with significant impact on growth, development, nutrition, immune competence
* Manifestation of a serious disease, which is expected to be accompanied by growth retardation, intestinal transit disruption or the need for special dietary treatment (e.g. hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, cystic fibrosis, Hirschsprung's disease, cow's milk protein intolerance.)
* Decision to administer HA (hypoallergenic) formula due to family atopies (defined by atopic disease of at least one 1 st degree relative: bronchial asthma, atopic dermatitis, pollinosis)
* Participation in another nutritional study
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

1 Month

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Humana Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Waldkrankenhaus Protestant Hospital, Spandau

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Hanna Petersen

Dr. Hanna Petersen

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frank Jochum, Dr. med.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Paul Gerhard Diakonie

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

von Kries R, Koletzko B, Sauerwald T, von Mutius E, Barnert D, Grunert V, von Voss H. Breast feeding and obesity: cross sectional study. BMJ. 1999 Jul 17;319(7203):147-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7203.147.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10406746 (View on PubMed)

Gonzalez-Garay AG, Serralde-Zuniga AE, Medina Vera I, Velasco Hidalgo L, Alonso Ocana MV. Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed term infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 6;11(11):CD013758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013758.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37929831 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1026

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.