Maintenance Capecitabine Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT ID: NCT02460419
Last Updated: 2022-10-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
104 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2020-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Capecitabine Plus Toripalimab Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma After First-line Treatment
NCT05484375
Maintenance Therapy With Toripalimab Combined With Capecitabine/Placebo for Recurrent and Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT05869227
Trial Evaluating Maintenance Chemotherapy for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT02944708
A Real-world Study of the Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitors Combined With Chemoradiotherapy in Lung Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT07062484
Clinical Study of Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome Injection Combined With Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine Monotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Who Failed Platinum-containing Treatment
NCT05717764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
maintenance capecitabine
maintenance capecitabine plus best supportive care(BSC)
capecitabine
capecitabine 1250mg/m2 bid, oral, for 14 days, every 3 weeks. Number of Cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.
Best supportive care (BSC)
Best supportive care and following-up every 6-8 weeks
best supportive care
Best supportive care and following-up every 6-8 weeks
Best supportive care (BSC)
Best supportive care and following-up every 6-8 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
capecitabine
capecitabine 1250mg/m2 bid, oral, for 14 days, every 3 weeks. Number of Cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.
Best supportive care (BSC)
Best supportive care and following-up every 6-8 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Disease controlled after 4-6 cycles of palliative chemotherapy with taxol,cisplatin and capecitabine
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2
* Life expectation at least 12 weeks
* No systemic chemotherapy within 6 months, except for induction chemotherapy or concurrent chemotherapy
* With at least one measurable lesion
* Enough blood test
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* HIV infection
* Sever infection
* Brain metastasis, except received radical therapy 6 months ago and stable in 4 weeks
* Allogeneic organ transplantation
* Malignancy other than nasopharyngeal carcinoma, except:cervical carcinoma in situ, cured basal cell carcinoma,bladder cancer of Ta,Tis or T1, or any cured cancer for at least 3 years
* Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Difficulty in swallowing
* Received other test drugs
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
OTHER
Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
OTHER
Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
XIANG YANQUN
MD,PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xiang Guo, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Sun Yat-sen University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
SunYat-senU
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jin Y, Shi YX, Cai XY, Xia XY, Cai YC, Cao Y, Zhang WD, Hu WH, Jiang WQ. Comparison of five cisplatin-based regimens frequently used as the first-line protocols in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct;138(10):1717-25. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1219-x. Epub 2012 Jun 10.
Chua DT, Yiu HH, Seetalarom K, Ng AW, Kurnianda J, Shotelersuk K, Krishnan G, Hong RL, Yang MH, Wang CH, Sze WK, Ng WT. Phase II trial of capecitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2012 Sep;34(9):1225-30. doi: 10.1002/hed.21884. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
Leong SS, Wee J, Rajan S, Toh CK, Lim WT, Hee SW, Tay MH, Poon D, Tan EH. Triplet combination of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and carboplatin followed by maintenance 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2008 Sep 15;113(6):1332-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23687.
Han J, Lan X, Tian K, Shen X, He J, Chen N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine maintenance therapy plus best supportive care vs. best supportive care alone as first-line treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;10:1086393. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1086393. eCollection 2022.
Liu GY, Li WZ, Wang DS, Liang H, Lv X, Ye YF, Zhao C, Ke LR, Lv SH, Lu N, Bei WX, Cai ZC, Chen X, Liang CX, Guo X, Xia WX, Xiang YQ. Effect of Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy Plus Best Supportive Care vs Best Supportive Care Alone on Progression-Free Survival Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Who Had Received Induction Chemotherapy: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Apr 1;8(4):553-561. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.7366.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015029
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.