A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate CHF 5633 (Synthetic Surfactant) and Poractant Alfa in Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) (POC)

NCT ID: NCT02452476

Last Updated: 2021-08-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

123 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-21

Study Completion Date

2018-05-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A multicenter, double blind, randomized, single dose, active-controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of synthetic surfactant (CHF 5633) in comparison to porcine surfactant (Poractant alfa, Curosurf ®) in the treatment of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Main objectives of this study are to investigate the short term efficacy profile of CHF 5633 vs. porcine surfactant (Poractant Alfa, Curosurf®) in terms of reduced oxygen requirement and ventilatory support and to evaluate the mid-term efficacy profile in terms of reduced incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and mortality/BPD rate at 36 weeks post menstrual age (PMA), mortality rate at 28 days and 36 weeks PMA, RDS-associated mortality through 14 days of age and other major co-morbidities of prematurity.

Inclusion criteria are: Written parental informed consent, inborn preterm neonates of either sex with a gestational age of 24+0 weeks up to 29+6 weeks, clinical course consistent with RDS, requirement of endotracheal surfactant administration within 24 hours from birth, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30 for babies 24+0 to 26+6 weeks and FiO2 ≥0.35 for babies 27+0 to 29+6 weeks to maintain arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2) between 88-95%.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CHF5633

Single dose within 24 hours from birth

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CHF5633

Intervention Type DRUG

Rescue treatment (if needed)

Poractant alfa

Single dose within 24 hours from birth

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Poractant alfa

Intervention Type DRUG

Rescue treatment (if needed)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CHF5633

Rescue treatment (if needed)

Intervention Type DRUG

Poractant alfa

Rescue treatment (if needed)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Written informed consent obtained by parents/legal representative (according to local regulation) prior to any study-related procedures
2. Inborn preterm neonates of either sex with a gestational age of 24+0 weeks up to 29+6 weeks
3. Clinical course consistent with RDS
4. Requirement of endotracheal surfactant administration within 24 hours from birth
5. Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥0.30 for babies 24+0 to 26+6 weeks and FiO2 ≥0.35 for babies 27+0 to 29+6 weeks to maintain SpO2 between 88-95%

Exclusion Criteria

1. Use of surfactant prior to study entry and need for intratracheal administration of any other treatment (e.g. nitric oxide)
2. Known genetic or chromosomal disorders, major congenital anomalies (cardiac malformations, myelomeningocele etc)
3. Maternal drug abuse (heroin, methadone, methamphetamine, or cocaine) or significant alcohol consumption during pregnancy
4. Mothers with prolonged rupture of the membranes (\>21 days duration)
5. Strong suspicion of congenital pneumonia/infection, sepsis
6. Presence of air leaks prior to study entry
7. Evidence of severe birth asphyxia
8. Neonatal seizures prior to study entry
9. Any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would place the neonate at undue risk
10. Participation in another clinical trial of any placebo, drug or biological substance conducted under the provisions of a protocol.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Hour

Maximum Eligible Age

24 Hours

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rangasamy Ramanathan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, LAC+USC Medical Center and Good Samaritan Hospital, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of South Alabama - USA Children's and Women's Hospital

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

LAC + USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UC Irvine Medical Center

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Sharp Mary Birch Hospital

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Connecticut Children's Medical Center

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Plantation General Hospital (Sheridan Clinical Research, Inc.)

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jatinder Bhatia

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Indiana University School of Medicine

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Memorial Hospital of South Bend

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Louisville Research Foundation, Inc.

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Baystate Children's Hospital / Baystate Medical Center

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Winthrop University Hospital

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

Kings County Hospital Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Sergio G. Golombek

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

Martha Naylor

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Case Western Reserve University

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Krishnamurthy Sekar

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Hahnemann University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

MultiCare Institute for Research & Innovation

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ramanathan R, Biniwale M, Sekar K, Hanna N, Golombek S, Bhatia J, Naylor M, Fabbri L, Varoli G, Santoro D, Del Buono D, Piccinno A, Dammann CE. Synthetic Surfactant CHF5633 Compared with Poractant Alfa in the Treatment of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. J Pediatr. 2020 Oct;225:90-96.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jun 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32553868 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CCD-05633AA1-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Aerosolized Surfactant in Neonatal RDS
NCT02294630 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2