Clinical RD (Respiratory Distress) Score for Objective Decision Making for Surfactant Therapy
NCT ID: NCT03273764
Last Updated: 2017-09-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
209 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-01-01
2016-12-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Surfactant Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in the Newborn ≥ 35 Weeks of Gestation
NCT01306240
The Effect of Surfactant Dose on Outcomes in Preterm Infants With RDS
NCT03808402
Early NCPAP Before Surfactant Treatment in Very Preterm Infants With RDS
NCT01996670
Impact of Delayed Cord Clamping and Minimally Invasive Surfactant Administration on Outcomes in Premature Infants Less Than 30 Weeks Gestation
NCT07092319
Lung Ultrasound to Guide Surfactant Therapy
NCT04330443
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The availability of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and natural surfactant have revolutionised the management of RDS. In 1967, Gregory et al. reported the value of application of continuous positive airway pressure in the management of RDS. Successful surfactant replacement therapy in RDS was reported by Fujiwara et al. Besides the use of Continuous positive airway pressure and surfactant replacement, the other advances include: Use of antenatal steroids to enhance pulmonary maturity, appropriate resuscitation and immediate use of CPAP for alveolar recruitment, Use of gentler modes of ventilation like patient triggered ventilation, Supportive therapies, such as the diagnosis and management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), fluid and electrolyte management, trophic feeding and nutrition.
The use of CPAP applied to the alveoli has been shown to stabilise and improve respiratory distress in preterm babies. It preserves the action of endogenous surfactant and may also obviate the need for surfactant in a substantial number of cases. CPAP is cost effective and more patient friendly than mechanical ventilation. Availability of CPAP even at the district level Special Newborn Care Unit (SNCU) in various states across the country make it an ideal candidate for respiratory support in the high risk population.
In addition to optimal respiratory support in the form of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or mechanical ventilation and good supportive care, surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) forms the mainstay in the management of RDS. Since the report by Fujiwara in 1980 of the first successful use of SRT, numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and their meta-analyses have established its efficacy in reducing mortality and air leak syndromes in RDS. Almost all the trials evaluating the role of SRT were conducted in high-income countries. Not surprisingly, SRT is the standard of care in neonates with RDS in these countries.
The population in low and middle income countries (LMIC) like India may differ significantly from the western world. But whether the evidence from these high income countries can be extrapolated to LMICs, still remains questionable. High cost of surfactant therapy, issue regarding regular supply of the drug, lack of skilled personnel, poor antenatal steroid coverage of mothers with preterm labour, higher incidence of perinatal hypoxia/ischemia and infections all complicate the clinical course of RDS. The paucity of evidence for efficacy and/ or safety of SRT in these settings further add to the complexity.
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains as the first line of respiratory support in spontaneously breathing infants with RDS and surfactant is administered if required. The beneficial effects of surfactant are more pronounced when the therapy is started earlier. In most of the units across the country, the decision to administer surfactant to such babies managed on CPAP is clinician oriented and hence remains highly subjective. There are no objective criteria to decide for administration of surfactant to infants who are initially managed with CPAP. The current study was planned keeping in mind the beneficial effects of early CPAP and early surfactant, with the aim of developing an objective scoring system, which would guide the clinician in decision making for administration of surfactant to infants with RDS who are already being managed with CPAP.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Preterm neonates with RDS
Singleton Preterm neonates with gestational age between 26 completed weeks to 34 completed weeks with clinical diagnosis of RDS without any major congenital anomalies.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Antenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease in fetus.
* Hydrops fetalis
* Massive Pulmonary hemorrhage prior to enrolment
* Shock requiring vasopressor support prior to enrolment
* Non availability of CPAP/ventilator in the unit.
26 Weeks
34 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lady Hardinge Medical College
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sushma Nangia, M.D.
Director professor and head of department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sushma Nangia, MBBS, MD, DM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kalawati Saran Chindren Hospital and Lady Hardinge Medical College
Debasish Nanda, MBBS, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kalawati Saran Chindren Hospital and Lady Hardinge Medical College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lady Hardinge Medical college
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LadyHardingeMedicalCollege
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.