Minimally Invasive Surgery for Ponto Bone Anchored Hearing Implants

NCT ID: NCT02438618

Last Updated: 2019-09-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-02

Study Completion Date

2018-11-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to make a comparison between two surgical techniques used when implanting a Ponto bone anchored hearing system.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Conductive Hearing Loss Unilateral Partial Deafness Mixed Conductive-sensorineural Hearing Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Minimally invasive punch technique

New surgical technique for Ponto bone anchored hearing implants

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Surgery for Ponto bone anchored hearing aids

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hultcrantz technique

Standard surgical technique for bone anchored hearing implants

Group Type OTHER

Surgery for Ponto bone anchored hearing aids

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery for Ponto bone anchored hearing aids

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patient, i.e. ≥ 18 years of age
* Eligible for the Ponto system

Exclusion Criteria

* Known history of immunosuppressive disease
* Use of systemic immunosuppressive medication
* Receiving bilateral bone anchored hearing system
* Relevant dermatological diseases as judged by the investigator
* Not being able to finish the study, for example because of failure to complete the questionnaires
* Participating in another study with medical aids or medication
* When there is no suitable implantation-site for the 4 mm implant during surgery because of insufficient bone quality.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oticon Medical

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Stokroos, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maastricht University Medical Centre

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Strijbos RM, Straatman LV, Stegeman I, Holmberg M, Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ. Health Economic Cost Analysis for Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices: The Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery Versus Linear Incision Technique with Tissue Preservation. Otol Neurotol. 2023 Aug 1;44(7):709-717. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003939. Epub 2023 Jun 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37400140 (View on PubMed)

Strijbos RM, Straatman LV, Calon TGA, Johansson ML, de Bruijn AJG, van den Berge H, Wagenaar M, Eichhorn E, Janssen M, Jonhede S, van Tongeren J, Holmberg M, Stokroos R. Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices. Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 24;12:632987. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.632987. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33716934 (View on PubMed)

Calon TG, van Hoof M, van den Berge H, de Bruijn AJ, van Tongeren J, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Jonhede S, Anteunis LJ, Janssen M, Joore MA, Holmberg M, Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Nov 9;17(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1662-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27829464 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C50

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Antibiotic Loaded Calcium Sulfate RCT
NCT03875963 TERMINATED NA