Checking Occlusion During Stainless Steel Crown Placement

NCT ID: NCT02437565

Last Updated: 2015-05-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stainless steel crowns are arguably the most successful posterior restorations in primary teeth and have been so for more than 50 years. Stainless steel crowns offer durability and success rates in excess of 95% making them the restoration of choice for posterior primary teeth in children treated under general anesthesia.

Failures of stainless steel crowns placed on primary teeth have been documented using several criteria including marginal adaptation, recurrent caries, abscess formation or root resorption, loss of the crown due to faulty retention and even perforation of the crown . Despite the probability that factors such as root resorption and failure of endodontic treatment could be due to traumatic occlusion, surprisingly little evidence is available in literature on the attempts made to check or evaluate the occlusion of stainless steel crowns placed under general anesthesia The aim of this study was to compare the time taken for placement and the overall success of bilateral multiple stainless crowns placed under general anesthesia using an occlusal index and compare them to crowns placed without such an index, using a randomized control study design

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A total of 60 patients (32 male and 28 female) aged between 4 and 7 years (Mean age 4.8 years, SD +/- 1.09 years) who met the inclusion criteria were recruited after obtaining informed consent from the parent. No financial incentives were offered for participation in the study. A total of 51 (29 male and 22 female) patients completed the six month follow up requirement (Fig 2).

Evaluation Crowns and the Procedure All patients were evaluated at 24 hours, one week, three months and six months post-operatively. Clinical criteria evaluated included the reporting of pain, discomfort, difficulty in mastication or high points reported by the patient. Tenderness on percussion, presence of premature mobility and clinical evidence of an abscess or fistula were checked by one of the investigators (SCP). Periapical digital radiographs were taken using a digital sensor (Schick Elite, Sirona Dental Inc. Long Island NY. USA) and were evaluated by the same examiner for radiographic evidence of failure. In order to ensure blinding the investigator (SCP) recording the findings was not made aware of which group the patient belonged to. The time taken for each procedure was calculated from the time of placement of the throat pack to the time of removal of the throat pack and was obtained from the intra-operative anesthesiologist notes. If failure of the crown occurred at 3 months, these teeth were excluded from the 6 month evaluation.

Statistical Analyses The parametric values of the control and case groups were compared using the student's t test. The non-parametric values of the control and case groups were compared using the Mann Whitney U test. All tests were conducted at p value of 0.05

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Placement of stainless steel crown under general anesthesia without the use of an occlusal template

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Stainless steel crown

Intervention Type OTHER

Placement of stainless steel crowns for teeth that have undergone pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpitis induced by severe early childhood caries under general anesthesia

Impression

Placement of stainless steel crown under general anesthesia with the use of an occlusal template prepared after making an impression of the teeth using a fast setting polyvinyl siloxane material

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stainless steel crown

Intervention Type OTHER

Placement of stainless steel crowns for teeth that have undergone pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpitis induced by severe early childhood caries under general anesthesia

Occlusal Template

Intervention Type OTHER

Use of an occlusal template for the placement of stainless steel crowns under general anesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stainless steel crown

Placement of stainless steel crowns for teeth that have undergone pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpitis induced by severe early childhood caries under general anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Occlusal Template

Use of an occlusal template for the placement of stainless steel crowns under general anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical Diagnosis of Severe Early Childhood Caries
* Have behavioral problems that require management under general anesthesia
* ASA class I
* Deep Dental Caries involving the pulp in all eight primary molars

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA class II or above
* Initial treatment plan cannot be carried out
* Need for extraction or pulpectomy in one or more primary molar
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Sharat Pani

Assistant Professor, Pediatric Dentistry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sharat C Pani, MDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FRP/2013/046

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Aesthetic Restorations in Deciduous Anterior Teeth
NCT05875064 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3