Retrospective Evaluation of COPD Patient Care

NCT ID: NCT02433223

Last Updated: 2018-05-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-06-30

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this project is to evaluate hospital utilisation, patient and service outcomes of a Respiratory Nursing Service to examine current clinical care of COPD. This evaluation aims to identify the important gaps in current clinical care of respiratory chronic disease nursing management. The primary outcomes of this evaluation is to determine the efficacy of clinical care in 2006, 2011, 2013 and 2015 and compare data to current Nursing Best practice guidelines for COPD through the quantification of hospital utilisation for hospital admission, average length of stay, readmission within 28 days, emergency service attendance, outpatient review, use of Hospital and Home (H@H), frequency of exacerbations, disease severity and progression (FEV1: GOLD Classification), number of contacts with the respiratory nursing service and type of contacts with the respiratory nursing service.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study design: This study is a retrospective observational crosssectional study conducted through review of medical records, internal respiratory databases and electronic hospital patient record (OACIS \& HOMER) over 3x12 blocks.

Participants: COPD patients from The Queen Elizabeth Hospital(TQEH) Respiratory Nursing Service who were new patients in 2006, 2011, 2013 and 2015 (Jan 1st to Dec 31st ). Data collection: Demographics, clinical data, hospital service utilisation, and clinical outcomes such as exacerbation frequency and disease progression. All data will be extracted into a standardised data extraction form, which a random subset will be checked by a second researcher.

Demographic data will include comparison of % without comorbidities, impact of comorbid conditions using Charleston Comorbidity index isolating diabetes, heart failure, anxiety and depression. Demographic and descriptive data will be given in means + SD and compared using a two-tailed Student t-test. Categorical variables will be compared using chisquared or Fisher exact tests, and when appropriate the MannWhitney Utest for nonparametric data. Statistical significance will be determined using an alpha of p \<0.05. All analyses will be examined using SPSS software (version x).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2006 Patients

Comparison of Respiratory Chronic Disease Management provided against recommendations in 2005 Respiratory Nursing Guidelines through documentation

No interventions assigned to this group

2011 Patients

Comparison of Respiratory Chronic Disease Management provided against recommendations in 2005 Respiratory Nursing Guidelines through documentation. With comparison of data against 2006 results.

No interventions assigned to this group

2013 Patients

Comparison of Respiratory Chronic Disease Management provided against recommendations in 2005 Respiratory Nursing Guidelines through documentation. With comparison of data against 2006 \& 2011 results.

No interventions assigned to this group

2015 Patients

Group added to reflect recency of practice. Comparison of Respiratory Chronic Disease Management provided against recommendations in 2005 Respiratory Nursing Guidelines through documentation. With comparison of data against 2006 \& 2011 results.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* any new client or new referral to the Respiratory Nursing Service in the years 2006, 2011, 2013 or 2015 only
* have a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Exclusion Criteria

* not a pre- existing client of the Respiratory Nursing Service
* not having a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kristin Carson

Senior Research Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brian J Smith, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QElizabethH COPD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.