LINX Reflux Management System in Subjects With GERD Who Have Previously Undergone a Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT ID: NCT02429830
Last Updated: 2022-08-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-04-05
2021-06-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Weight Loss Using Gastric Stimulation in Obese Patients
NCT00200083
Safety and Feasibility of the Use of the Dual Robotic Arm Accessory With the Levita Magnetic Surgical System in Laparoscopic Procedures
NCT05695989
Open-label, Prospective Evaluation of the Ulthera® System for Lifting Submental (Under the Chin) and Neck Tissue in Chinese Patients
NCT03351335
ENDObesity® II Study: TransPyloric Shuttle® System for Weight Loss
NCT02518685
Multi-Center Pre-Bariatric Weight Loss Study
NCT00469391
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with GERD that have undergone a LSG procedure have limited surgical treatment options if they are looking for an alternative to continuous acid suppression therapy (i.e. proton pump inhibitors or equivalent). One procedure, fundoplication, is extremely difficult to perform as LSG patients have a limited amount of fundus tissue remaining after sleeve surgery. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may be chosen as a conversion procedure but is more invasive with the potential for serious complications. LINX may be considered as an alternative and less invasive option that may potentially have few complications compared to RYGB.
The study is an observational, multicenter, single-arm study with prospective enrollment. Based on the observational status of the study, no formal statistical hypothesis tests will be conducted. Up to 30 patients meeting the eligibility requirements will be implanted with LINX and followed through 12-months after implant. Up to twelve (12) clinical sites will enroll subjects. Safety evaluations will be ongoing throughout the duration of the study, starting at the implant procedure. Efficacy endpoints will be evaluated at the 12-month visit.
Safety will be evaluated based on the rate of serious device and procedure related adverse events (AEs). Safety will also be evaluated by endoscopy to assess the mucosa and x-rays to verify device location at 12 months post implant. Efficacy will be measured at 12 months (compared to baseline) by examining 3 variables: normalization of total distal acid exposure or at least a 50% reduction, at least a 50% reduction in total GERD-HRQL scores and at least a 50% reduction in average daily PPI dosage.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single arm study
Previous LSG patient will be treated with the LINX device and serve as their own control
LINX device
The LINX device is a permanent implant placed at the area of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and is designed to augment a weak LES and minimize or eliminate GERD-related symptoms.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LINX device
The LINX device is a permanent implant placed at the area of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and is designed to augment a weak LES and minimize or eliminate GERD-related symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age \>22 years
2. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for obesity \>12 months prior to proposed device implantation date.
3. Subject is a surgical candidate, i.e. is able to undergo general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery.
4. Documented typical symptoms of GERD for longer than 6 months (regurgitation or heartburn which is defined as a burning epigastric or substernal pain which responds to acid neutralization or suppression).
5. Subject requires daily proton pump inhibitor or other anti-reflux drug therapy.
6. Total distal ambulatory esophageal pH must meet the following criteria: pH \<4 for \>4.5% of the time. Note: Subjects shall have discontinued any GERD medications for at least 7 days prior to testing, with the exception of antacids up to the morning of testing.
7. Subjects with symptomatic improvement on PPI therapy demonstrated by a GERD-HRQL score of \<10 on PPI and \>15 off PPI, or subjects with a \>6 point improvement when comparing their on PPI and off PPI GERD-HRQL scores.
8. GERD symptoms, in absence of PPI therapy (minimum 7 days).
9. If the subject is of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within one week prior to implant and must agree to use effective means of birth control during the course of the study.
10. Subject is willing and able to cooperate with follow-up examinations
11. Subject has been informed of the study procedures and the treatment and has signed an informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
1. The procedure is an emergency procedure.
2. Suspected or known allergies to titanium, stainless steel, nickel, or ferrous materials.
3. Presence of ˃3 cm hiatal hernia as determined by endoscopy or barium esophagram.
4. Subject had any major complications related to the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy that may interfere with, or increase the risks of the LINX procedure (such as, but not limited to, leaks from the gastric remnant and infection at the sleeve gastrectomy)
5. Plans to surgically revise the gastric pouch (either known preoperatively or decided intraoperatively)
6. Currently being treated with another investigational drug or investigational device.
7. Suspected or confirmed esophageal or gastric cancer or prior gastric or esophageal surgery or endoscopic intervention for GERD (with the exception of sleeve gastrectomy).
8. Distal amplitude \<35 mmHg or \<70% peristaltic sequences (if using Conventional Manometry). -or- If using High Resolution Manometry (exclude for any of the following):
* Distal Contractile Integral (DCI) ≤ 450 mmHg·s·cm or
* ≥ 50% ineffective swallows or
* ≥ 50% fragmented swallows (Fragmented swallows are defined as those with a ≥ 5cm break \[large\] in peristaltic integrity).
9. Presence of esophagitis - Grade C or D (LA Classification).
10. BMI \>35.
11. Symptoms of dysphagia more than once per week within the last 3 months.
12. Diagnosed with Scleroderma.
13. Diagnosed with an esophageal motility disorder such as but not limited to achalasia, nutcracker esophagus, or diffuse esophageal spasm or hypertensive LES.
14. Subject has a history of or known esophageal stricture or gross esophageal anatomic abnormalities (Schatzki's ring, obstructive lesions, etc.)
15. Subject has esophageal or gastric varices
16. History of/or known Barrett's esophagus. Note: The diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus requires both endoscopic and histologic evidence of metaplastic columnar epithelium. Endoscopically, there must be columnar epithelium within the esophagus. Histologically, the epithelium must be metaplastic, as defined by the presence of goblet cells.by
17. Subject cannot understand trial requirements or is unable to comply with follow-up schedule
18. Pregnant or nursing, or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study.
19. Any reason which the Investigator believes may cause the subject to be non-compliant with or unable to meet the protocol requirements.
20. Subject has an electrical implant or metallic, abdominal implants.
22 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Torax Medical Incorporated
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William J. Petraiuolo, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ethicon Endo-Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwest Allied Bariatric & Foregut Surgery
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Mercy Health Northwest Arkansas
Rogers, Arkansas, United States
Keck Medical Center of USC
Los Angeles, California, United States
Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery
Englewood, Colorado, United States
RWJBH Univ. Hospital Somerset/Advanced Surgical and Bariatrics of NJ, PA
Somerset, New Jersey, United States
Buffalo General Medical Center
Buffalo, New York, United States
Adirondack Surgical Group
Saranac Lake, New York, United States
East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Coastal Carolina Bariatric & Surgical Center
Summerville, South Carolina, United States
Panhandle Weight Loss Center
Amarillo, Texas, United States
Gunderson Health System
La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TRX_2016_01
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
4600
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.