LINX Reflux Management System in Subjects With GERD Who Have Previously Undergone a Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

NCT ID: NCT02429830

Last Updated: 2022-08-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-05

Study Completion Date

2021-06-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the LINX device in patients who have previously undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for obesity and have chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The study will monitor safety and changes in reflux symptoms.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this study is to confirm safety and efficacy after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in subjects indicated for LINX is similar to the outcomes that formed the basis for the LINX Premarket Approval to support modification of the current labeling. Presently, there is a precautionary statement that safety and effectiveness of the LINX has not been established for prior esophageal or gastric surgery or endoscopic intervention.

Patients with GERD that have undergone a LSG procedure have limited surgical treatment options if they are looking for an alternative to continuous acid suppression therapy (i.e. proton pump inhibitors or equivalent). One procedure, fundoplication, is extremely difficult to perform as LSG patients have a limited amount of fundus tissue remaining after sleeve surgery. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may be chosen as a conversion procedure but is more invasive with the potential for serious complications. LINX may be considered as an alternative and less invasive option that may potentially have few complications compared to RYGB.

The study is an observational, multicenter, single-arm study with prospective enrollment. Based on the observational status of the study, no formal statistical hypothesis tests will be conducted. Up to 30 patients meeting the eligibility requirements will be implanted with LINX and followed through 12-months after implant. Up to twelve (12) clinical sites will enroll subjects. Safety evaluations will be ongoing throughout the duration of the study, starting at the implant procedure. Efficacy endpoints will be evaluated at the 12-month visit.

Safety will be evaluated based on the rate of serious device and procedure related adverse events (AEs). Safety will also be evaluated by endoscopy to assess the mucosa and x-rays to verify device location at 12 months post implant. Efficacy will be measured at 12 months (compared to baseline) by examining 3 variables: normalization of total distal acid exposure or at least a 50% reduction, at least a 50% reduction in total GERD-HRQL scores and at least a 50% reduction in average daily PPI dosage.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

GERD Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single arm study

Previous LSG patient will be treated with the LINX device and serve as their own control

Group Type OTHER

LINX device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The LINX device is a permanent implant placed at the area of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and is designed to augment a weak LES and minimize or eliminate GERD-related symptoms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LINX device

The LINX device is a permanent implant placed at the area of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and is designed to augment a weak LES and minimize or eliminate GERD-related symptoms.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects included in the study must meet all the following criteria:

1. Age \>22 years
2. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for obesity \>12 months prior to proposed device implantation date.
3. Subject is a surgical candidate, i.e. is able to undergo general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery.
4. Documented typical symptoms of GERD for longer than 6 months (regurgitation or heartburn which is defined as a burning epigastric or substernal pain which responds to acid neutralization or suppression).
5. Subject requires daily proton pump inhibitor or other anti-reflux drug therapy.
6. Total distal ambulatory esophageal pH must meet the following criteria: pH \<4 for \>4.5% of the time. Note: Subjects shall have discontinued any GERD medications for at least 7 days prior to testing, with the exception of antacids up to the morning of testing.
7. Subjects with symptomatic improvement on PPI therapy demonstrated by a GERD-HRQL score of \<10 on PPI and \>15 off PPI, or subjects with a \>6 point improvement when comparing their on PPI and off PPI GERD-HRQL scores.
8. GERD symptoms, in absence of PPI therapy (minimum 7 days).
9. If the subject is of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within one week prior to implant and must agree to use effective means of birth control during the course of the study.
10. Subject is willing and able to cooperate with follow-up examinations
11. Subject has been informed of the study procedures and the treatment and has signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects should be excluded from the study based on the following criteria:

1. The procedure is an emergency procedure.
2. Suspected or known allergies to titanium, stainless steel, nickel, or ferrous materials.
3. Presence of ˃3 cm hiatal hernia as determined by endoscopy or barium esophagram.
4. Subject had any major complications related to the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy that may interfere with, or increase the risks of the LINX procedure (such as, but not limited to, leaks from the gastric remnant and infection at the sleeve gastrectomy)
5. Plans to surgically revise the gastric pouch (either known preoperatively or decided intraoperatively)
6. Currently being treated with another investigational drug or investigational device.
7. Suspected or confirmed esophageal or gastric cancer or prior gastric or esophageal surgery or endoscopic intervention for GERD (with the exception of sleeve gastrectomy).
8. Distal amplitude \<35 mmHg or \<70% peristaltic sequences (if using Conventional Manometry). -or- If using High Resolution Manometry (exclude for any of the following):

* Distal Contractile Integral (DCI) ≤ 450 mmHg·s·cm or
* ≥ 50% ineffective swallows or
* ≥ 50% fragmented swallows (Fragmented swallows are defined as those with a ≥ 5cm break \[large\] in peristaltic integrity).
9. Presence of esophagitis - Grade C or D (LA Classification).
10. BMI \>35.
11. Symptoms of dysphagia more than once per week within the last 3 months.
12. Diagnosed with Scleroderma.
13. Diagnosed with an esophageal motility disorder such as but not limited to achalasia, nutcracker esophagus, or diffuse esophageal spasm or hypertensive LES.
14. Subject has a history of or known esophageal stricture or gross esophageal anatomic abnormalities (Schatzki's ring, obstructive lesions, etc.)
15. Subject has esophageal or gastric varices
16. History of/or known Barrett's esophagus. Note: The diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus requires both endoscopic and histologic evidence of metaplastic columnar epithelium. Endoscopically, there must be columnar epithelium within the esophagus. Histologically, the epithelium must be metaplastic, as defined by the presence of goblet cells.by
17. Subject cannot understand trial requirements or is unable to comply with follow-up schedule
18. Pregnant or nursing, or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study.
19. Any reason which the Investigator believes may cause the subject to be non-compliant with or unable to meet the protocol requirements.
20. Subject has an electrical implant or metallic, abdominal implants.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Torax Medical Incorporated

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

William J. Petraiuolo, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ethicon Endo-Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwest Allied Bariatric & Foregut Surgery

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mercy Health Northwest Arkansas

Rogers, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Keck Medical Center of USC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

RWJBH Univ. Hospital Somerset/Advanced Surgical and Bariatrics of NJ, PA

Somerset, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Buffalo General Medical Center

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Adirondack Surgical Group

Saranac Lake, New York, United States

Site Status

East Carolina University

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Coastal Carolina Bariatric & Surgical Center

Summerville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Panhandle Weight Loss Center

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Gunderson Health System

La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TRX_2016_01

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

4600

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gastrectomy at Low Pressure Trial - (GALPT)
NCT07313930 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA