Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
352 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-28
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* 22 gauge (G) needle with suction
* 25 G needle with suction
* 22 G needle without suction
* 25 G needle without suction
Follow-up Phone Call Phase:
Unit staff will call patients 1 week after the procedure to check if patients had any adverse events from the procedure and this will be recorded onto the dataset.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial Comparing 19 and 25G Needles for Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions Greater Than 35mm
NCT01815606
Trial Comparing 19 and 25-gauge EUS-FNA Needles
NCT01677312
Comparing Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Samples for Pancreatic Masses
NCT02911974
Comparison of Two Fine Needle Biopsy Needles for Solid Pancreatic Masses
NCT02910960
Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions
NCT04085055
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. After written informed consent is taken, Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) will be performed under conscious sedation.
2. At the time of EUS, patients who require FNA will be randomized to the two needles (22 G or 25 G needles) and to the two techniques (using suction or not using suction).
3. Computer-generated randomization assignments using the block randomization method will be obtained from the statistician prior to study enrollment. These will be placed in sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes and opened by the endoscopy nurse immediately after the decision to perform FNA is made. The randomization sequence will specify the needle size to be used and whether or not suction will be applied for FNA.
4. FNA will be performed in the standard fashion using one of the designated needle sizes (using the fanning technique to pass the needle 12-16 times into the lesion) by one of the experienced endosonographers in the unit. The needle stylet will be left in place for the first pass and then removed for subsequent passes. Suction will be applied during aspiration of the mass as dictated by the randomization sequence.
5. First two passes will be performed to obtain tissue sample for cell block analysis. Therefore, the tissue obtained with the first and second passes will be expressed onto a slide and into test tubes for cell block analysis.
6. From the third pass onwards, the aspirate obtained will be examined onsite by the cytopathologist, who will be available to interpret the slides immediately to determine diagnostic adequacy of the sample per standard practice. Once the diagnosis is made and the adequacy of the sample is affirmed by the cytopathologist, the procedure will be stopped and the echoendoscope will be withdrawn from the patient.
7. Total number of passes to obtain a diagnostic cytological aspirate made will be recorded at the time of procedure, as well as the occurrence of needle dysfunction, technical failure, and any immediate complications.
8. The samples taken will be transported to the pathology lab (per standard practice) where the cellular aspirate and cell block samples will be evaluated by the pathologist. 10% of samples from each subgroup (i.e. 22G with suction, 22G without suction, 25G with suction, 25G without suction) will be further analyzed for the presence of molecular markers for malignancy.
9. After the appropriate observations are deemed satisfactory, patients will be discharged as per unit policy.
10. Unit staff will call patients 1 week after the procedure to check if patients had any adverse events from the procedure and this will be recorded onto the dataset.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
22 gauge with suction
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses will be performed with a 22 gauge needle using suction.
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses will be performed using a 22 or a 25 gauge needle with or without applying suction.
22 gauge needle
22 gauge without suction
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses will be performed with a 22 gauge needle without suction.
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses will be performed using a 22 or a 25 gauge needle with or without applying suction.
22 gauge needle
25 gauge with suction
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses will be performed with a 25 gauge needle using suction.
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses will be performed using a 22 or a 25 gauge needle with or without applying suction.
25 gauge needle
25 gauge without suction
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses will be performed with a 25 gauge needle without suction.
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses will be performed using a 22 or a 25 gauge needle with or without applying suction.
25 gauge needle
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses
EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses will be performed using a 22 or a 25 gauge needle with or without applying suction.
22 gauge needle
25 gauge needle
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age ≥ 19 years
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unable to safely undergo EUS for any reason
3. Coagulopathy (INR \>1.6, Thrombocytopenia with platelet count \<80,000/ml)
4. Unable to provide consent for any reason
5. Pregnancy (confirmed with Standard of Care urine pregnancy test for all women with child-bearing potential)
19 Years
89 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AdventHealth
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shyam S Varadarajulu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AdventHealth
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;16(11):1820-1828.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
618366
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.