Evaluating the Number of Passes Required for Diagnostic Cell Block During EUS-FNA of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions
NCT ID: NCT01809028
Last Updated: 2017-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-02-28
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial Comparing 19 and 25-gauge EUS-FNA Needles
NCT01677312
Trial Comparing 19 and 25G Needles for Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions Greater Than 35mm
NCT01815606
Randomized Trial for Optimal Number of Passes Required for Molecular Profiling During EUS-FNB of Pancreatic Cancer
NCT05043532
Comparing Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Samples for Pancreatic Masses
NCT02911974
Fine Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions
NCT04085055
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To compare the number of passes required for obtaining adequate cell block material during EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Primary Research Hypothesis:
More specimen is required to obtain definitive diagnosis on cell block. This translates to less need for repeat procedures (due to nondiagnostic index procedure due to inadequate FNA passes), prompt treatment to patients and better use of health care resources. Therefore, we will be comparing 2 versus 4 FNA passes to determine which number of FNA pases will yield an adequate diagnostic cell block.
Secondary Aims:
To compare the rate of complications when performing 2 versus 4 EUS-FNA passes of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Secondary Research Hypothesis:
EUS-guided FNA is a safe procedure with a complication rate of \< 1%. By performing more (four) NA passes one is likely to yield a better quality cell block while at the same time without compromising patient safety.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EUS FNA with 2 passes
biopsy with 2 passes of the needle
EUS FNA with 2 passes
biopsy with 2 passes
EUS FNA with 4 passes
biopsy with 4 passes of the needle
EUS FNA with 4 passes
biopsy with 4 passes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS FNA with 2 passes
biopsy with 2 passes
EUS FNA with 4 passes
biopsy with 4 passes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unable to safely undergo EUS for any reason
3. Coagulopathy (INR \>1.6, Prothrombin Time \>18secs, Thrombocytopenia \<80,000 cells/ml)
4. Unable to consent
5. Non-English speaking patients.
6. Participation in any other Clinical Trial (excluding registries and databases)
19 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
AdventHealth
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shyam Varadarajulu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AdventHealth
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Holt BA, Hasan MK, Logue A, Hawes RH, Hebert-Magee S. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Dec;80(6):1056-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.05.304. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
407129
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.