Study of PEMF (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field) Therapy in the Treatment of Persistent Post-Operative Pain Following Lumbar Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02416973
Last Updated: 2017-02-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Registry Study to Evaluate Outcomes of PEMF Therapy in Subjects With Various Pain Etiologies
NCT02881112
The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy on Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT03053375
High Intensity Focused Electromagnetic Therapy on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Lumbar Disc Prolapse
NCT07278596
Multi-modal Imaging of Myofascial Pain - Phase 2
NCT07322445
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Neuropathic Pain in Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT07263737
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sham of Provant
Sham of Provant
Provant
Active Treatment
Active Provant Treatment
Provant
Active Treatment with alternative settings
Active Provant Treatment with alternative settings
Provant
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Provant
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject has undergone one or two anatomically successful lumbar back surgeries for the treatment of low back pain.
3. Subject has persistent pain in the low back and/or radiating pain to leg(s) for \> 3 months and \< 36 months following the most recent surgery. If radiating leg pain is occurring in both legs, one leg, which has the worst Average Pain Intensity over the week prior to the Screening Visit, will be selected as the index leg.
4. Subject has been receiving medication for persistent post-operative low back and/or radiating leg pain, including opioid or non-opioid analgesic medication, and is on a stable analgesic dosing regimen (i.e. the same medications and dosages) for \> 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
5. Average Pain Intensity (calculated as the mean of the daily Average Pain Intensity scores for either back and/or leg) is ≥ 3 and \< 9 as measured on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during the 10-day run-in period.
6. Subject has completed a minimum of 80% (8 of 10 possible) of the electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) assessments during the 10 day run-in period.
7. Subject is able to access an internet browser in the home environment.
8. Subject is willing and able to give written informed consent and to comply with all parts of the study protocol.
9. Female subjects must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile, abstinent, or practicing (or agree to practice) an effective method of birth control if they are sexually active for the duration of the study. (Effective methods of birth control include prescription hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, double-barrier methods, and/or male partner sterilization).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject requires additional lumbar surgery or surgery of any type prior to Day 75.
3. Subject had disc fusion at any level in the most recent surgery.
4. Subject has received any investigational drug or device within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the drug, whichever is longer, prior to the Screening Visit or is enrolled in another clinical trial.
5. Subject has undergone any local injection into the lumbar spine within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or within 6 weeks prior to the Screening Visit for long acting lidocaine injection products.
6. Subject has used systemic corticosteroids within 2 months of the Screening Visit.
7. Subject has a history of any uncontrolled medical illness that in the investigator's judgment places the subject at unacceptable risk for receipt of PEMF therapy.
8. Subject has a history of malignancy within the past five years other than successfully treated non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin in the treatment area and/or localized in situ carcinoma of the cervix.
9. Subject has an ongoing painful condition that in the opinion of the investigator might have a confounding influence on the safety or effectiveness analyses for this study.
10. Subject has a serious psychosocial co-morbidity.
11. Subject has a history of drug or alcohol abuse within one year prior to screening.
12. Subject has an implanted pacemaker, defibrillator, neurostimulator, spinal cord stimulator, bone stimulator, cochlear implant, or other implanted device with an implanted metal lead(s).
13. Subject consumes an average of \> 100 mg oral Morphine Sulfate equivalents per day during the 10 day run-in period.
14. Standard deviation around the mean of the average pain intensity scores during the 10 day run-in period is \> 2.0.
15. Subject has a Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 38 kg/m2.
16. Subject is currently pregnant or planning on becoming pregnant prior to Day 75.
17. Subject has been previously treated with the PROVANT Therapy System.
18. Subject is in current litigation regarding back pain or is receiving Worker's Compensation.
19. Subject is unwilling or unable to follow study instructions, comply with the treatment regimen, study visits, and ePRO assessments.
22 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Regenesis Biomedical, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
AOC-Research
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Hope Research
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Injury Care Research
Boise, Idaho, United States
Rockford Orthopedic
Rockford, Illinois, United States
Hope Research_Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Tarheel Clinical Research
Raliegh, North Carolina, United States
Upstate Clinical
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Danville Orthopedic
Danville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RBI.2015.001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.