High Level Pulsed Heat Versus Low Level Steady Heat in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT04109703

Last Updated: 2019-12-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-01

Study Completion Date

2019-09-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a double blinded randomized active placebo controlled trial in subjects with chronic low back pain. The trial compares pain relief by a device that delivered high level pulsed heat (45 °C) to pain relief delivered by a steady heat lower temperature device (37 °C). The hypothesis is that the high temperature pulsed heat device will produce significantly better pain relief as compared to the lower level steady heat device. The secondary hypothesis is that pain relief will occur faster in the high pulsed heat device as compared to the control device.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. This study will be conducted under Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines and suitable for FDA submission in order to obtain claims such as, "provides temporary pain relief for people with chronic lower back pain."
2. The study is designed as a randomized double blinded two arm placebo controlled trial.
3. The active arm (N=50) receives two active Series 5 heating units (Soovu Labs Inc.) that pulse heat to 45ºC (113ºF). The active Series 5 placebo arm (N=50) gets two identical appearing units (Soovu Labs Inc.) that produce low level of heat at 37ºC (96.8 ºF). For reference skin temperature is about 33 ºC and room temperature 23 ºC.
4. The study hypothesis is that in subjects with chronic low back pain, the active heating device group will show a statistical improvement in pain scores as compared to the active placebo group as measured by the primary outcome measure, the Numeric Pain Scale (NPS).
5. Subjects will be told the study is examining the pain relieving effectiveness of two different levels of heat.
6. Subjects must have chronic low back pain with a pretreatment level of pain 4 or greater on a 0-10 point scale. By definition chronic low back pain is a condition that has been present for at least 6 months and must be present more days than not over the course of a week.
7. No use of pain medications during the four hour trial. However, pain medications including schedule IIIs can be taken up to 30 minutes before the start of the trial. Medications permitted during the trial include medications such as tramadol, codeine, NSIADs, gabapentin and acetaminophen. Non-pain medications for medical indications are permitted at any time. Subjects taking schedule II opioids are excluded from the study. Schedule II opioids include oxycodone, hydromorphone, hydrocodone, fentanyl and methadone.
8. Ages 22 through 70 inclusive.
9. Exclusion criteria- sciatica if present must be rated significantly less than the non -radiating component of the low back pain, pregnancy, skin lesions such as open skin or sores, scar tissue, skins grafts, old burns over the treatment area or neuropathic sensory loss over the treatment site.
10. Pre-treatment assessments include, Numeric Pain Scale, and a pre-study questionnaire (history, treatment preferences, short form Brief Pain Inventory, and short form Magill).
11. Each treatment session lasts approximately 30 minutes with pain assessments throughout using NPS (primary outcome measure). Secondary outcome measures include measures of comfort and willingness to endorse their treatment.
12. All subjects are followed for a 4 hour post treatment period with intermittent pain assessments (NPS).
13. At the end of the post treatment period, subjects complete a post study usability questionnaire and a blinding questionnaire.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain Low Back Pain Heat Analgesia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

chronic pain low back pain heat thermal analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double blinded, randomized, active placebo controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Double blinded with a control condition using a low level heating (37 degree C) device. The active experimental device used heast that intermittently pulsed to 45 degrees C.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High level pulsed heat

Subjects randomized to this arm received a generation 5 device (Soovu Labs Inc.) that produced 30 minutes of heat. The heat was delivered as waves peaking at 45° C.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

High Level Pulsed Heat delivered by Generation 5 devices from Soovu Labs Inc.

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Soovu Labss Inc. battery powered device is a one inch diameter heating pod that attaches to the user via a ring system. The device may be programmed to deliver a wide variety of treatment algorithms. Control of the devices are through a phone-based bluetooth connection. For this study the treatment algorithm used for subjects in this arm (experimental) used a temperature that was ramped from skin temperature to a peak temperature of 45° C and cycled for 30 minutes.

Low level steady heat

Subjects randomized to this arm received an identical generation 5 device (Soovu Labs Inc.) that produced 30 minutes of heat. The heat was delivered in a steady manner at 37° C.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Low Level (37 degrees C) delivered by the control device Generation 5 devices from Soovu Labs Inc.

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Soovu Labs Inc. battery powered device is a one inch diameter heating pod that attaches to the user via a ring system. The device may be programmed to deliver a wide variety of treatment algorithms. Control of the devices are via a phone-based bluetooth connection. For this control arm of the study the treatment algorithm held a steady temperature of 37 degrees C for a 30 minute period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High Level Pulsed Heat delivered by Generation 5 devices from Soovu Labs Inc.

The Soovu Labss Inc. battery powered device is a one inch diameter heating pod that attaches to the user via a ring system. The device may be programmed to deliver a wide variety of treatment algorithms. Control of the devices are through a phone-based bluetooth connection. For this study the treatment algorithm used for subjects in this arm (experimental) used a temperature that was ramped from skin temperature to a peak temperature of 45° C and cycled for 30 minutes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Low Level (37 degrees C) delivered by the control device Generation 5 devices from Soovu Labs Inc.

The Soovu Labs Inc. battery powered device is a one inch diameter heating pod that attaches to the user via a ring system. The device may be programmed to deliver a wide variety of treatment algorithms. Control of the devices are via a phone-based bluetooth connection. For this control arm of the study the treatment algorithm held a steady temperature of 37 degrees C for a 30 minute period.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Experimental arm Control arm

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Chronic low back pain. By definition chronic low back pain is a condition that has been present for at least 6 months on more days than not. If there is a radiating component of the low back pain the radiating component must have a pain rating less than the non-radiating component of the low back pain.
2. Subjects must have pretreatment level of pain 4 or greater.
3. Ages 22 through 70 inclusive
4. Non pain medications are permitted as needed for conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, heart disease etc.
5. Medications such as tramadol, codeine, NSIADs, gabapentin and acetaminophen are not permitted during the trial but may be included under the discretion of the study physician.
6. Subjects must have a reliable method for clinic contact and follow-up.

\-

Exclusion Criteria

1. Sciatica or radicular pain without non-radiating low back pain, cancer, radicular pain greater than the non-radiating component of low back pain, pregnancy, skin lesions such as open skin or sores, scar tissue, skins grafts, old burns over the treatment area.
2. Medications including oxycodone, hydromorphone, hydrocodone, fentanyl and methadone are excluded from the trial but may be included under the discretion of the study physician. Such decisions will be documented should they occur.

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northern California Research Corporation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Washington

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Soovu Labs Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

charles chabal, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Soovu Labs Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northern California Research Institute

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201969K

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id