Comparison of Subcutaneous INFIX and EXFIX for Anterior Pelvic Ring Fractures Requiring Stabilization

NCT ID: NCT02403154

Last Updated: 2018-03-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

4 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research is to compare patient outcomes of two treatment methods that are currently used as standard of care to treat anterior pelvic ring injuries that require stabilization. The two treatment methods are subcutaneous internal fixation (INFIX) and external fixation (EXFIX). Patients will be given the opportunity to opt out of randomization and participate in one of the observational arms. The first observational arm is comprised of those patients who do not want to randomize and they will undergo anterior pelvic ring stabilization according to the treating surgeon's discretion. The second observational arm will be comprised of patients who consent to be in the study but whose pelvic ring fractures do not require any form of anterior pelvic internal fixation based on the treating surgeon's opinion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this research is to compare patient outcomes of two treatment methods that are currently used as standard of care to treat anterior pelvic ring injuries that require stabilization. The two treatment methods are subcutaneous internal fixation (INFIX) and external fixation (EXFIX). Patients will be given the opportunity to opt out of randomization and participate in one of the observational arms. The first observational arm is comprised of those patients who do not want to randomize and they will undergo anterior pelvic ring stabilization according to the treating surgeon's discretion. The second observational arm will be comprised of patients who consent to be in the study but whose pelvic ring fractures do not require any form of anterior pelvic internal fixation based on the treating surgeon's opinion. This type of injury requires follow up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. At each follow up appointment, the patient will be asked to complete surveys as part of the PROMIS series (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) which will include surveys about physical function, pain, mobility, sex life satisfaction, depression, and for male patients, a survey about erectile function. In addition to the PROMIS questionnaire for pain, the investigators will also use a visual analogue pain scale and ask what the patient's satisfaction is on a scale of 0-100%. If the patient does not report to clinic for follow up, the research coordinator will call the patient to complete the study questionnaires.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anterior Pelvic Ring Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Randomized to Internal Fixator

Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention will be internal fixator.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Internal Fixator

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.

Randomized to External Fixator

Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention will be external fixator.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

External fixator

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

External fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are outside of the body.

Observational - Internal Fixator

Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and either the treating physician selected the internal fixator intervention based on their preference for the specific case or the patient chose the internal fixator.

Group Type OTHER

Internal Fixator

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.

Observational - External Fixator

Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and either the treating physician selected the external fixator intervention based on their preference for the specific case or the patient chose the external fixator.

Group Type OTHER

External fixator

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

External fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are outside of the body.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Internal Fixator

Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

External fixator

External fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are outside of the body.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* One or more fractures of the anterior pelvic ring (pubic rami)
* Need for anterior pelvic ring stabilization
* Injury amenable to external as well as subcutaneous internal fixation per the treating surgeon's opinion
* Patient was ambulatory prior to sustaining the injury
* Provision of informed consent by patient or proxy

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a slim build with little subcutaneous fat who cannot be treated with a subcutaneous internal fixator based on the treating surgeon's opinion
* Patients who are deemed not likely to follow-up (e.g. patients who live more than 50 miles away and patients with no fixed address)
* Moderately or severely cognitively impaired patients
* Pregnant women
* Prisoners
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

120 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Zlowodzki, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arazi M, Kutlu A, Mutlu M, Yel M, Kapiciglu MI. The pelvic external fixation: the mid-term results of 41 patients treated with a newly designed fixator. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(10):584-6. doi: 10.1007/s004020000142.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11110141 (View on PubMed)

Gansslen A, Pohlemann T, Krettek C. [A simple supraacetabular external fixation for pelvic ring fractures]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2005 Sep;17(3):296-312. doi: 10.1007/s00064-005-1134-2. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16132252 (View on PubMed)

Hupel TM, McKee MD, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Primary external fixation of rotationally unstable pelvic fractures in obese patients. J Trauma. 1998 Jul;45(1):111-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9680022 (View on PubMed)

Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Bostman O, Santavirta S. Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Nov;81(6):955-62. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b6.8571.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10615965 (View on PubMed)

Majeed SA. External fixation of the injured pelvis. The functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Jul;72(4):612-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B4.2380212.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2380212 (View on PubMed)

Mears DC, Fu FH. Modern concepts of external skeletal fixation of the pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Sep;(151):65-72.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7418325 (View on PubMed)

Tucker MC, Nork SE, Simonian PT, Routt ML Jr. Simple anterior pelvic external fixation. J Trauma. 2000 Dec;49(6):989-94. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200012000-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11130512 (View on PubMed)

Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Mar;71(2):304-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B2.2925751.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2925751 (View on PubMed)

Riemer BL, Butterfield SL, Diamond DL, Young JC, Raves JJ, Cottington E, Kislan K. Acute mortality associated with injuries to the pelvic ring: the role of early patient mobilization and external fixation. J Trauma. 1993 Nov;35(5):671-5; discussion 676-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199311000-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8230327 (View on PubMed)

Wild JJ Jr, Hanson GW, Tullos HS. Unstable fractures of the pelvis treated by external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Sep;64(7):1010-20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7118964 (View on PubMed)

Cole PA, Gauger EM, Anavian J, Ly TV, Morgan RA, Heddings AA. Anterior pelvic external fixator versus subcutaneous internal fixator in the treatment of anterior ring pelvic fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):269-77. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182410577.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22357081 (View on PubMed)

Gardner MJ, Mehta S, Mirza A, Ricci WM. Anterior pelvic reduction and fixation using a subcutaneous internal fixator. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):314-21. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318220bb22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22048189 (View on PubMed)

Merriman DJ, Ricci WM, McAndrew CM, Gardner MJ. Is application of an internal anterior pelvic fixator anatomically feasible? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2111-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2287-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22383020 (View on PubMed)

Moazzam C, Heddings AA, Moodie P, Cole PA. Anterior pelvic subcutaneous internal fixator application: an anatomic study. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):263-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31823e6b82.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22337488 (View on PubMed)

Vaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, Tonnos F, Sethi A. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jan;26(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318233b8a7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22048183 (View on PubMed)

Vaidya R, Kubiak EN, Bergin PF, Dombroski DG, Critchlow RJ, Sethi A, Starr AJ. Complications of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation for unstable pelvis fractures: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2124-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2233-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22219004 (View on PubMed)

Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):344-9. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002088.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11491193 (View on PubMed)

Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8628042 (View on PubMed)

PELTIER LF. COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH FRACTURES OF THE PELVIS. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965 Jul;47:1060-9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14318624 (View on PubMed)

Scaglione M, Parchi P, Digrandi G, Latessa M, Guido G. External fixation in pelvic fractures. Musculoskelet Surg. 2010 Nov;94(2):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s12306-010-0084-5. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21086087 (View on PubMed)

Pohlemann T, Bosch U, Gansslen A, Tscherne H. The Hannover experience in management of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Aug;(305):69-80.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8050249 (View on PubMed)

Holstein JH, Pizanis A, Kohler D, Pohlemann T; Working Group Quality of Life After Pelvic Fractures. What are predictors for patients' quality of life after pelvic ring fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2841-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2840-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23408176 (View on PubMed)

Kabak S, Halici M, Tuncel M, Avsarogullari L, Baktir A, Basturk M. Functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation for completely unstable pelvic ring fractures (type C): a report of 40 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Sep;17(8):555-62. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200309000-00003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14504576 (View on PubMed)

McCarthy ML, MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Copeland CE, Hash CS, Burgess AR. Functional status following orthopedic trauma in young women. J Trauma. 1995 Nov;39(5):828-36; discussion 836-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199511000-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7473997 (View on PubMed)

Mullis BH, Sagi HC. Minimum 1-year follow-up for patients with vertical shear sacroiliac joint dislocations treated with iliosacral screws: does joint ankylosis or anatomic reduction contribute to functional outcome? J Orthop Trauma. 2008 May-Jun;22(5):293-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816b6b4e.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18448980 (View on PubMed)

Oliver CW, Twaddle B, Agel J, Routt ML Jr. Outcome after pelvic ring fractures: evaluation using the medical outcomes short form SF-36. Injury. 1996 Nov;27(9):635-41. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00100-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9039360 (View on PubMed)

Suzuki T, Shindo M, Soma K, Minehara H, Nakamura K, Uchino M, Itoman M. Long-term functional outcome after unstable pelvic ring fracture. J Trauma. 2007 Oct;63(4):884-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000235888.90489.fc.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18090021 (View on PubMed)

Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Schubeck D, Wang XF. Functional outcomes in women after high-energy pelvic ring injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):296-301. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318221e94e.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22337480 (View on PubMed)

Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Valeriote J, O'Brien PJ, Macadam SA. Reporting and interpretation of the functional outcomes after the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Apr;94(4):549-55. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B4.27960.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22434474 (View on PubMed)

Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GP, Ngai JT, Broekhuyse HM, O'Brien PJ. What outcomes are important for patients after pelvic trauma? Subjective responses and psychometric analysis of three published pelvic-specific outcome instruments. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jan;28(1):23-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182945fe9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23571293 (View on PubMed)

Sprague S, Leece P, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski MF; S.P.R.I.N.T. Investigators. Limiting loss to follow-up in a multicenter randomized trial in orthopedic surgery. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Dec;24(6):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14662277 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1404651343

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.