Trial Outcomes & Findings for Comparison of Subcutaneous INFIX and EXFIX for Anterior Pelvic Ring Fractures Requiring Stabilization (NCT NCT02403154)
NCT ID: NCT02403154
Last Updated: 2018-03-13
Results Overview
The primary objective is to compare functional outcomes between subcutaneous internal fixation and external fixation as measured by the PROMIS v1.2-Physical Function instrument.
TERMINATED
NA
4 participants
24 hrs - 24 months
2018-03-13
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Randomized to Internal Fixator
Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention will be internal fixator.
Internal Fixator: Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.
|
Randomized to External Fixator
Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention will be external fixator.
External fixator: External fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are outside of the body.
|
Observational - Internal Fixator
Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and either the treating physician selected the internal fixator intervention based on their preference for the specific case or the patient chose the internal fixator.
Internal Fixator: Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.
|
Observational - External Fixator
Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and either the treating physician selected the external fixator intervention based on their preference for the specific case or the patient chose the external fixator.
External fixator: External fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are outside of the body.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Randomized to Internal Fixator
n=2 Participants
Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention will be internal fixator.
Internal Fixator: Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.
|
Randomized to External Fixator
Patient signed consent and agreed to have their treatment method randomized and the randomization system determined that their surgical intervention will be external fixator.
External fixator: External fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are outside of the body.
|
Observational - Internal Fixator
n=1 Participants
Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and either the treating physician selected the internal fixator intervention based on their preference for the specific case or the patient chose the internal fixator.
Internal Fixator: Internal fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are inserted under the skin, internally.
|
Observational - External Fixator
n=1 Participants
Patient signed consent but did not want to randomize their procedure and either the treating physician selected the external fixator intervention based on their preference for the specific case or the patient chose the external fixator.
External fixator: External fixator refers to pins usually inserted into the iliac bones and then connected together by clamps and bars that are outside of the body.
|
Total
n=4 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
2 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=1 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hrs - 24 monthsPopulation: No data was analyzed for this study. The PI left our institution and the study was pre-maturely closed. With such a small patient population, the data that was collected was not analyzed because achieving statistical significance was not possible.
The primary objective is to compare functional outcomes between subcutaneous internal fixation and external fixation as measured by the PROMIS v1.2-Physical Function instrument.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours - 24 monthsPopulation: No analyses were done on this study. We did not enroll enough patients in order to come to any conclusions prior to the PI leaving the institution.
We will compare the implant failure/breakage rate between the two interventions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours - 24 monthsWe will compare the rate of infection between the two interventions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours - 24 monthsWe will compare the revision surgery rates between the two interventions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours - 24 monthsWe will ask patients multiple questionnaires to assess their quality of life after surgery. These questionnaires include: PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Mobility, PROMIS Global Satisfaction with Sex Life, PROMIS Depression, Majeed score, SF-12, VAS, patient satisfaction score, and (only in men) PROMIS Erectile Function.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours - 24 monthsWe will evaluate factors such as age, gender, BMI, additional injuries to see if they help predict outcome
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours - 24 monthsWe will ask patients multiple questionnaires to asses their functional outcomes after surgery. These questionnaires include: PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Mobility, PROMIS Global Satisfaction with Sex Life, PROMIS Depression, Majeed score, SF-12, VAS, patient satisfaction score, and (only in men) PROMIS Erectile Function.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Randomized to Internal Fixator
Randomized to External Fixator
Observational - Internal Fixator
Observational - External Fixator
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Krista Brown, Clinical Research Coordinator
Indiana University
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place