Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
250 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-06-01
2025-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Surgery for pelvic ring fractures has become increasingly common over the past three decades Recovery is often delayed for weeks post-surgery, depending on the center. Modern management emphasizes early rehabilitation, including early mobility and weight-bearing, when possible. Increasing the number of screws, their diameter and length, and systematically fixing both anterior and posterior lesions add safety for early reloading
The aim of the study is The main objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical outcome associated with early weight-bearing in patients operated on for a pelvic ring fracture in a large cohort of patients at Grenoble University Hospital, compared to patients operated on for the same type of pelvic ring fracture with delayed weight-bearing.
The investigator hypothesize that early weight-bearing of pelvic ring fractures with biomechanically stable fixation does not result in significant differences in clinical outcomes at a minimum of one year compared to patients with delayed weight-bearing
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Use of a Minimally Invasive Internal Fixation Device for Treatment of Unstable Pelvic Ring Fractures
NCT05871866
The Sequence of Fixation in Tile C1.2 and C1.3 Vertical Shear Pelvic Ring Injuries.
NCT06792305
Pelvic Fractures in the Elderly
NCT03476824
Early Internal Fixation Versus NonOperative Care With Early Rehabilitation for LC1 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis
NCT06496867
Current Incidence and Treatments Performed of Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis in France in 2013
NCT02848924
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Early weight-bearing of patients operated on for a pelvic ring fracture
Clinical outcomes and complications will be compared between the two groups
No interventions assigned to this group
Delayed weight -bearing of patients operated on for a pelvic ring fracture
Clinical outcomes and complications will be compared between the two groups
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pelvic ring fracture
* Pre-operative X-rays
* Pre-operative CT scan
* Post-operative X-rays
* Postoperative CT scan
* Willingness and ability to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant and breastfeeding women
* People under guardianship, protected adults
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Grenoble
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mehdi PI BOUDISSA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Grenoble Alpes university Hospital,La tronche
Grenoble, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pennal GF, Tile M, Waddell JP, Garside H. Pelvic disruption: assessment and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Sep;(151):12-21.
Ruatti S, Guillot S, Brun J, Thony F, Bouzat P, Payen JF, Tonetti J. Which pelvic ring fractures are potentially lethal? Injury. 2015;46(6):1059-63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.041. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
Papakostidis C, Kanakaris NK, Kontakis G, Giannoudis PV. Pelvic ring disruptions: treatment modalities and analysis of outcomes. Int Orthop. 2009 Apr;33(2):329-38. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0555-6. Epub 2008 May 7.
Routt ML Jr, Kregor PJ, Simonian PT, Mayo KA. Early results of percutaneous iliosacral screws placed with the patient in the supine position. J Orthop Trauma. 1995 Jun;9(3):207-14. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199506000-00005.
Goldstein A, Phillips T, Sclafani SJ, Scalea T, Duncan A, Goldstein J, Panetta T, Shaftan G. Early open reduction and internal fixation of the disrupted pelvic ring. J Trauma. 1986 Apr;26(4):325-33. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198604000-00004.
Lindsay A, Tornetta P 3rd, Diwan A, Templeman D. Is Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation of Unstable Posterior Ring Injuries as Accurate as Open Reduction and Internal Fixation? J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jan;30(1):29-33. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000418.
Melhem E, Riouallon G, Habboubi K, Gabbas M, Jouffroy P. Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in France. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Sep;106(5):831-839. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.019. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
Herteleer M, Dejaeger M, Nijs S, Hoekstra H, Laurent MR. Epidemiology and secular trends of pelvic fractures in Belgium: A retrospective, population-based, nationwide observational study. Bone. 2021 Dec;153:116141. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116141. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
Rickman M, Link BC, Solomon LB. Patient Weight-bearing after Pelvic Fracture Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature: What is the Modern Evidence Base? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2019 Jan-Apr;14(1):45-52. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1414.
Tonetti J, Carrat L, Lavallee S, Pittet L, Merloz P, Chirossel JP. Percutaneous iliosacral screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Sep;(354):103-10. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199809000-00013.
Tonetti J. Management of recent unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. An update conference supported by the Club Bassin Cotyle. (Pelvis-Acetabulum Club). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Feb;99(1 Suppl):S77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
Lichte P, Alabdulrhaman H, Pishnamaz M, Hofman M, Hildebrand F, Kobbe P. [Percutaneous screw techniques for the pelvic ring and acetabulum]. Unfallchirurg. 2019 May;122(5):387-403. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-0648-2. German.
Boudissa M, Roudet A, Fumat V, Ruatti S, Kerschbaumer G, Milaire M, Merloz P, Tonetti J. Part 1: Outcome of Posterior Pelvic Ring Injuries and Associated Prognostic Factors - A Five-Year Retrospective Study of One Hundred and Sixty Five Operated Cases with Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Fixation. Int Orthop. 2020 Jun;44(6):1209-1215. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04574-1. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
Boudissa M, Carmagnac D, Kerschbaumer G, Ruatti S, Tonetti J. Screw misplacement in percutaneous posterior pelvic iliosacral screwing with and without navigation: A prospective clinical study of 174 screws in 127 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Apr;108(2):103213. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103213. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
Rommens PM. Is there a role for percutaneous pelvic and acetabular reconstruction? Injury. 2007 Apr;38(4):463-77. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.025. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
Takao M, Hamada H, Sakai T, Sugano N. Clinical Application of Navigation in the Surgical Treatment of a Pelvic Ring Injury and Acetabular Fracture. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1093:289-305. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-1396-7_22.
Stine S, Washington A, Sen RK, Nasr K, Vaidya R. Pelvic Malunion: A Systematic Review, Dichotomy of Definitions and Treatment. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 14;58(8):1098. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081098.
Haynes SR, Lawler PG. An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation. Anaesthesia. 1995 Mar;50(3):195-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb04554.x.
Baker SP, O'Neill B. The injury severity score: an update. J Trauma. 1976 Nov;16(11):882-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197611000-00006. No abstract available.
Tile M. Acute Pelvic Fractures: I. Causation and Classification. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1996 May;4(3):143-151. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199605000-00004.
Tornetta P 3rd, Matta JM. Outcome of operatively treated unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):186-93. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00022.
Keshishyan RA, Rozinov VM, Malakhov OA, Kuznetsov LE, Strunin EG, Chogovadze GA, Tsukanov VE. Pelvic polyfractures in children. Radiographic diagnosis and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Nov;(320):28-33.
Lefaivre KA, Blachut PA, Starr AJ, Slobogean GP, O'Brien PJ. Radiographic displacement in pelvic ring disruption: reliability of 3 previously described measurement techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Mar;28(3):160-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829efcc5.
Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Mar;71(2):304-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B2.2925751.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-A00479-38
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.