Surgical Treatment of Pelvis in Fragility Fracture in Germany: a Prospective, National, Multicenter, Observational, Comparative Cohort Study Comparing Isolated Posterior Versus Combined Anterior-posterior Surgical Fracture Stabilization
NCT ID: NCT06550934
Last Updated: 2025-02-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
420 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-03-31
2027-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Pain levels, quality of life, level of mobility and independence will be assessed at different time points. Furthermore, both clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, morbidity and mortality associated with interventions will be evaluated. Assessment and evaluation will be performed at defined time points during FU according to standard of care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP)
NCT04182776
Pelvic Fractures in the Elderly
NCT03476824
Conservative or Operative Therapy in Patients With a Fragility Fracture of the Pelvis
NCT04744350
Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture: A Prospective Observational Study
NCT04615104
Follow-Up of the Prevision® Hip Stem
NCT04833634
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization
Fracture stabilization
isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization vs. combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization
Combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization
Fracture stabilization
isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization vs. combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fracture stabilization
isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization vs. combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnostic workup for fracture diagnosis and classification performed using CT scan as per standard of care
* Indication for surgical fracture fixation as considered by the attending surgeon
* Age ≥ 65 yrs.
* Low-energy trauma fracture, or osteoporotic fracture, or insufficiency fracture, or spontaneous fracture
* ASA-Score ≤ 3 pts.
* Ability to provide informed consent according to the IRB/EC defined and approved procedures
Exclusion Criteria
* Instability of the pubic symphysis (ie, visibility of a widening or diastasis of the symphysis), and/or fractures of the pubic rami next to the symphysis, that indicate instability
* Pelvic fractures due to high-energy trauma
* Pathologic fractures (eg, fractures caused by malignancy or infection)
* History of pelvic fracture or pelvic ring surgery (hip joint implants do not count)
* Clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that prevents surgical treatment
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AUC - Akademie der Unfallchirurgie
UNKNOWN
AO Trauma Deutschland e.V.
OTHER
AO Innovation Translation Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Richard Stange, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitätsklinikum Münster
Lars Grossterlinden, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AO TOP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.