Surgical Treatment of Pelvis in Fragility Fracture in Germany: a Prospective, National, Multicenter, Observational, Comparative Cohort Study Comparing Isolated Posterior Versus Combined Anterior-posterior Surgical Fracture Stabilization

NCT ID: NCT06550934

Last Updated: 2025-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

420 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-31

Study Completion Date

2027-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Over a period of approximately two years, patients above the age of 65 who have suffered from an FFP equal to or higher than type IIc FFP, according to Rommens and Hofmann, will be eligible for inclusion. At least 420 patients will be included and followed up up for 12 months. Treatment and postoperative care, will be as per standard of care at the participating institution, with a free choice of isolated posterior or combined anterior-posterior surgical treatment.

Pain levels, quality of life, level of mobility and independence will be assessed at different time points. Furthermore, both clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, morbidity and mortality associated with interventions will be evaluated. Assessment and evaluation will be performed at defined time points during FU according to standard of care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvis; Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization

Fracture stabilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization vs. combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization

Combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization

Fracture stabilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization vs. combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fracture stabilization

isolated posterior surgical fracture stabilization vs. combined anterior-posterior surgical fracture stabilization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with sacral FFP (no concomitant injuries) Types: IIc, IIIc, IVb, IVc according to Rommens and Hofmann associated with fracture of the anterior pelvic ring (fractures involving the anterior lip of the acetabulum that are not regarded as acetabular fracture will be included)
* Diagnostic workup for fracture diagnosis and classification performed using CT scan as per standard of care
* Indication for surgical fracture fixation as considered by the attending surgeon
* Age ≥ 65 yrs.
* Low-energy trauma fracture, or osteoporotic fracture, or insufficiency fracture, or spontaneous fracture
* ASA-Score ≤ 3 pts.
* Ability to provide informed consent according to the IRB/EC defined and approved procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with multiple fractures
* Instability of the pubic symphysis (ie, visibility of a widening or diastasis of the symphysis), and/or fractures of the pubic rami next to the symphysis, that indicate instability
* Pelvic fractures due to high-energy trauma
* Pathologic fractures (eg, fractures caused by malignancy or infection)
* History of pelvic fracture or pelvic ring surgery (hip joint implants do not count)
* Clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that prevents surgical treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AUC - Akademie der Unfallchirurgie

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

AO Trauma Deutschland e.V.

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

AO Innovation Translation Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Stange, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitätsklinikum Münster

Lars Grossterlinden, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Cynthia Sob, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+41798937428

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AO TOP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Endoscopic Acetabulum Surgery
NCT06365112 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1