Volar Plate vs. Conventus DRS Fixation

NCT ID: NCT02390856

Last Updated: 2019-02-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-28

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable distal radius fractures is performed using a variety of fixation techniques. The most common method is fixed angle volar plate application. The investigators plan to compare the outcomes of fixed angle volar plating with a novel FDA approved intramedullary fixation device, Conventus DRS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures in the upper extremity. While a widely used method of fracture fixation, numerous studies have shown that locked volar plate fixation is associated with soft tissue irritation, flexor and extensor tendon rupture, and screw penetration of the radiocarpal or the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Prominent hardware mandates hardware removal in 5-18% of cases.

Intramedullary fixation has recently received more attention in the literature because of the minimally invasive procedure required for device implantation. Additionally, because intramedullary fixation places the implant within the bone instead of onto it, the lack of implant exposure, as well as decreased soft tissue dissection, carries the potential for decreased inflammation at the surgical site. This prospective randomized case series will evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of an expandable intramedullary fixation device and compare the complication profile with traditional fixed angle volar locked plating in a single-surgeon case series at a single hospital.

The wide variety of distal radius fractures demand customized treatment, and a number of different surgical treatments methods are available.(1) While percutaneous/external fixation, dorsal plating, fragment specific fixation, and intramedullary rod fixation have been studied, volar locked plate fixation has emerged over the past decade as the most common and versatile method of fracture fixation. Unfortunately, soft tissue and hardware complications continue to plague volar plate fixation, including digital stiffness, loss of forearm rotation, tendinopathy and tendon rupture, nerve injury and compression, hardware irritation, screw prominence, CRPS, and malunion.

Tarallo et al performed a retrospective review of 303 patients who had undergone volar plate fixation and found that implant-related complications had occurred in 5% of the patients (2). Of these, common complications seen were tendon rupture, screw loosening, and penetration into the articular space. While Tarallo et al studied only hardware related complications, other studies have reported complications associated of volar locking plate fixation as high as 22-27% (3,4). The flexor pollicis longus in particular is vulnerable to rupture, as hardware prominence at the watershed line of the distal radius exposes the FPL and other flexor tendons to frictional forces which result in fraying and rupture (5). Prominent pegs or screws dorsally threaten the extensor pollicis longus and neighboring extensor tendons.

Intramedullary fixation has limited data to date, and the current methods are applicable to a relatively narrow subset of radial fracture types. In a case series of three patients, Gunther and Lynch have shown that intramedullary fixation performed with a partially flexible rod that can be locked into rigid position once implanted in the bone resulted in good functional outcomes (6). Patients returned to their daily lives and at one-year post-operatively no adverse effects were reported. A prospective study analyzing the comparative functional outcomes between intramedullary nail versus volar plate fixation similarly found that functional recovery was comparative between the two groups, and that complication rates were slightly lower in the intramedullary fixation cohort (7). The authors of this study however noted the continued potential for screw penetration into the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ).

The Conventus DRS expandable intramedullary fixation device used in this proposed study is FDA approved. A cadaveric study compared the fixation strength of the Conventus DRS with fixed angle volar plate fixation and demonstrated equivalency between the two for axial compression mean stiffness and dorsal bend mean stiffness (8). The Conventus DRS has been used in Europe where over 250 patients have been treated with the device. A safety and efficacy 'white paper' of the first 60 patients treated for a wide variety of fractures demonstrated excellent improvements in DASH scores with few hardware related events and an overall adverse event profile of 8.3%. (9) There was one re-operation for loss of fixation and four minor cases of neuritis that resolved. The device is FDA-approved in the US, and is being used across the country.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fractures, Closed

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Volar Plate

Patients in this group will undergo distal radius fracture fixation with a traditional volar plate.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Volar Plate

Intervention Type DEVICE

A volar plate is a metallic plate fastened directly to the fractured bone with screws, to hold the fracture fragments in proper position. Volar plate fixation is the traditional surgical method for distal radius fractures.

Conventus DRS

Patients in this group will undergo distal radius fracture fixation with the Conventus DRS intramedullary fixation device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Conventus DRS

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Conventus DRS (TM) is an intramedullary device intended to treat distal radius fractures. The device remains flexible during placement, but is made rigid at the completion of the surgical implant procedure. The implant is made from titanium alloy (Ti-6A1-4V) and Nitinol.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventus DRS

The Conventus DRS (TM) is an intramedullary device intended to treat distal radius fractures. The device remains flexible during placement, but is made rigid at the completion of the surgical implant procedure. The implant is made from titanium alloy (Ti-6A1-4V) and Nitinol.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Volar Plate

A volar plate is a metallic plate fastened directly to the fractured bone with screws, to hold the fracture fragments in proper position. Volar plate fixation is the traditional surgical method for distal radius fractures.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Conventus DRS Intramedullary Fixation Device

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Skeletally mature patients (18-80)
* Unstable AO Type A and C1 fractures
* Closed injuries, acute (\<14 days), displaced, and unstable

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients under the age of 18 or over the age of 85 (if included in our analysis, these would likely be outliers in our patient population)
* Patients with documented complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) or history of CRPS
* Patients with suspected or known allergies to titanium or nickel
* Patients who are non-English speakers
* Patients with open wound fractures
* Patients with inflammatory arthritis
* Patients with positive pregnancy test
* Previous major wrist injury or surgery (not including Carpal Tunnel, De Quervain's and trigger finger release)
* Patients with previously diagnosed metabolic bone disease, currently being treated.
* Non-English speaking patients (validated, translated questionnaires are not available)
* Patients needing ipsilateral concomitant operations that will have material impact on the study
* Patients with previous wrist fractures, prior wrist injury, stiffness, degenerative joint disease, or pain
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott W Wolfe, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital for Special Surgery

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tarallo L, Mugnai R, Zambianchi F, Adani R, Catani F. Volar plate fixation for the treatment of distal radius fractures: analysis of adverse events. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Dec;27(12):740-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182913fc5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23515129 (View on PubMed)

Rozental TD, Blazar PE. Functional outcome and complications after volar plating for dorsally displaced, unstable fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Mar;31(3):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16516728 (View on PubMed)

Arora R, Lutz M, Hennerbichler A, Krappinger D, Espen D, Gabl M. Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radius fracture with a palmar locking-plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 May;21(5):316-22. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318059b993.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17485996 (View on PubMed)

Limthongthang R, Bachoura A, Jacoby SM, Osterman AL. Distal radius volar locking plate design and associated vulnerability of the flexor pollicis longus. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 May;39(5):852-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.038. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24630941 (View on PubMed)

Gunther SB, Lynch TL. Rigid internal fixation of displaced distal radius fractures. Orthopedics. 2014 Jan;37(1):e34-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20131219-14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24683654 (View on PubMed)

Gradl G, Mielsch N, Wendt M, Falk S, Mittlmeier T, Gierer P, Gradl G. Intramedullary nail versus volar plate fixation of extra-articular distal radius fractures. Two year results of a prospective randomized trial. Injury. 2014 Jan;45 Suppl 1:S3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.045. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24268189 (View on PubMed)

van Kampen RJ, Thoreson AR, Knutson NJ, Hale JE, Moran SL. Comparison of a new intramedullary scaffold to volar plating for treatment of distal radius fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Sep;27(9):535-41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182793df7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23187156 (View on PubMed)

Palmer AK, Hale JE. Conventus DRS Plating System: A Preliminary Report [White paper]. Conventus Orthopedics 2013. Retrieved from <http://www.conventusortho.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/4473-1-Rev-2-White-Paper-Conventus-Distal-Radius-System-A-Preliminary-Report.pdf>.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-211

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.