Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-05-10
2017-05-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Over 60% of AIS patients present with a transient acute hypertensive response, which is theorized to be the result of either increased sympathoadrenal tone, poorly controlled underlying hypertension, or an unknown stroke-specific mechanism related to augmenting cerebral perfusion through collateral blood flow. Epidemiological data suggests worse stroke outcomes are associated with extremes of sustained hypo- or hypertension, which has led to dozens of clinical trials involving over 20,000 patients to determine if pharmacologically lowering blood pressure after AIS is beneficial. The results have been persistently neutral or negative. In contrast, there have been no major clinical trials on the efficacy of using vasopressor medications to maintain or increase baseline blood pressure after AIS, despite promising preclinical data and pilot studies that showed no increase in cerebral hemorrhage or edema. The only randomized trial of vasopressor use after AIS demonstrated an improvement in clinical outcomes, but there was no difference in mean blood pressure between the control and intervention arms, suggesting the beneficial effect was not exclusively related to induced hypertension. One possibility is that the vasopressor reduced blood pressure variability, which preliminary data has shown to be detrimental after AIS, although that aspect of neurovascular coupling has not been adequately studied in the acute phase after AIS.
The reliance on IV vasopressors, which are only administered in the intensive care unit, is a fundamental limitation of prior research. An alternative, but untested, approach is to use the oral vasopressor midodrine hydrochloride. We hypothesize that frequent midodrine dosing after AIS can optimize collateral blood flow and help salvage the ischemic penumbra. The objective of this study is to develop tools to quantify midodrine's effect on blood pressure and the ischemic penumbra.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Phase Ib/II in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT02963376
Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the Penumbra System
NCT00334061
Desmopressin for Reversal of Antiplatelet Drugs in Stroke Due to Haemorrhage
NCT03696121
The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Early Deterioration After Successful Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke
NCT04978181
Safety and Efficacy of the Penumbra™ System in Acute Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) Stroke
NCT01133223
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No patients
Study has been withdrawn
Midodrine
Not appliciable
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Midodrine
Not appliciable
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Demonstrable neurologic deficit due to stroke at randomization.
3. Within 12 hours of randomization, measured on CT or MR perfusion: a cerebral blood flow (CBF)/DWI ratio ≥1.25, an absolute difference between the CBF and DWI lesions of ≥15 mL, and a DWI volume between 20-100 mL. (Quantified with the Olea software)
4. Enrollment within 24 hours from stroke onset
Exclusion Criteria
2. Acute myocardial infarction on ECG or troponin T \>0.01 ng/mL.
3. History of cardiac disease, including myocardial infarction or unstable angina within the last 3 months, any history of clinically significant arrhythmia, symptomatic valvular disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, left-ventricular assist device, or known ejection fraction \< 25%.
4. Glomerular filtration rate \< 50, serum creatinine \>1.5 mg/dl, severe urinary retention, or end-stage renal disease on dialysis.
5. Coagulopathy, including INR \>1.5, PTT \>40, platelet count \<75, or use of a novel anticoagulant in the last 3 days (e.g. dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban).
6. Positive pregnancy test.
7. Clinical and laboratory evidence of thyrotoxicosis.
8. Severe Peripheral Vascular Disease or Raynaud's syndrome.
9. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>180 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>100 immediately prior to randomization.
10. Allergy or history of adverse reaction to IV phenylephrine or midodrine.
11. Hemorrhage within the area of DWI lesion on MRI.
12. Indication for anticoagulation within 5 days of stroke onset.
13. Arterial dissection or cerebral aneurysm.
14. Pre-stroke modified Rankin score of \>2.
15. Evidence of bacterial endocarditis.
16. Indication for carotid endarterectomy or stenting in next 5 days.
17. Inability or unwillingness of subject or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent.
18. Failure of post-stroke swallow evaluation and no alternative enteric access (e.g. nasogastric feeding tube, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube).
19. Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adam de Havenon
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB_76683
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.