Web-based Interpretation Training For Anxiety

NCT ID: NCT02382003

Last Updated: 2025-02-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

807 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2019-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to develop a web-based Cognitive Bias Modification infrastructure to train interpretations, and evaluate the usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the program to reduce anxiety symptoms.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approximately half of the U.S. population experiences serious mental health problems during their lifetime, including 29% with anxiety pathology severe enough to qualify for an anxiety disorder diagnosis \[1\]. Critically, more than two thirds of individuals struggling with a mental illness do not receive treatment \[1\]. With this level of mental illness burden, it is clear that treating people one-on-one in an office setting will never meet the existing needs \[2\]. There are many barriers to treatment, including costs \[3\], difficulties accessing evidence-based treatments in many regions \[4\], and associated stigma \[5\]. Thus, there is a pressing need to consider alternative, larger scale approaches to delivering mental health services. Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) interventions hold considerable promise as a way to meet these needs, especially for anxiety difficulties \[6\]. These computer-based programs are designed to alter biased ways of thinking, such as a tendency toward negative interpretations, which cause and maintain anxiety \[6\]. Because these programs do not require therapist contact and can be administered on any computer with an Internet connection, CBM holds promise as a cost-effective method that can be disseminated widely. However, while CBM for interpretation bias (CBM-I) has established efficacy when administered in-person in the laboratory \[7\], it now needs to be tested with broader populations using a web-based infrastructure to examine: a) whether the program will be effective in a web environment, b) whether the program continues to engage the targeted mechanism (i.e., interpretation bias), c) the feasibility of this delivery method, and d) the modifications needed to adapt the program for the web (in particular, to prime anxiety-linked negative thinking in an online environment, we test the effect of adding a guided anxious imagery exercise to prime feared outcomes prior to each training session).

Together, the current proposal will develop an infrastructure to pilot test the effectiveness of web-based CBM-I for anxiety symptoms. CBM-I training will target moderate to severe anxiety symptoms, a widespread problem area with considerable occupational and social impairment \[8\]. Participants will be visitors to Project Implicit Mental Health (PIMH), an existing website directed by the Principal Investigator that allows visitors to assess their cognitive biases tied to mental health concerns. Consistent with the RFA's priorities, this approach encourages efficiencies by capitalizing on the existing PIMH site and its heavy traffic. Further, the site's large number of visitors and use of automated assessments will make it efficient to assess baseline demographic characteristics and interpretation bias as moderators of CBM-I effects that can be tested in future trials.

Aim 1: Develop and evaluate usability and acceptability of web-based CBM-I for anxiety symptoms.

Aim 1 will build the web-based interpretation bias training program using the PIMH infrastructure. We will pilot the program on a small test group of moderate to highly anxious participants (N=15) who will complete questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to provide feedback on the programs' usability and acceptability. Further, an advisory board (N=8) of anxiety researchers, clinicians, and experts in CBM and web-based research will provide feedback on the program and study protocol. Using a "deployment-focused" approach, this feedback from experts and end-users will be used to iteratively modify the program for the trial planned for Aims 2 and 3. Thus, even at this initial pilot stage, we will measure the targeted outcome (anxiety symptoms) and mechanism (interpretation bias) to determine whether modifications to enhance target engagement are needed. Note, within Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), this outcome falls under the Potential Threat/Anxiety construct within the Negative Valence System, and the targeted mechanism (interpretation bias) falls under the Response Selection, Inhibition construct within the Cognitive (effortful) control system. Both the outcome and mechanism will be objectively measured using multiple units of analysis (e.g., behavior and self-report). Further, mechanisms underlying the guided anxious imagery prime's effects will be measured by assessing subjective distress, imagery vividness, and activation of feared outcomes following the manipulation. This prime was selected in part because of its potential to be disseminated widely in future trials, given it does not require human contact.

Aim 2: Test target engagement, feasibility and effectiveness of web-based CBM-I.

Aim 3: Evaluate the impact of an anxious prime on web-based CBM-I for anxiety symptoms.

Aims 2 and 3 will test the feasibility of an 8-session web-based interpretation training program among individuals with moderate to severe anxiety symptoms (based on screening at the PIMH site). Participants will be randomly assigned to positive CBM-I (90% positive scenario training), 50% positive/50% negative CBM-I, or a no scenario control condition. Half the participants in each of these 3 conditions will receive an anxious imagery prime prior to each training session, and half will receive a neutral imagery prime, resulting in a 3 training condition x 2 prime design (N=210; target of n=35 per condition). Feasibility will be determined by analyses of recruitment, attrition, acceptance of randomization, adherence to and appropriateness of the measurement model, caseness, extent of missing data, and safety. Additionally, target engagement (change in interpretation bias) and preliminary tests of effectiveness at reducing anxiety symptoms will be evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anxiety

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Positive Training+Anxious Imagery Prime

Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation training paired with a preceding Anxious Imagery Prime

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Training involves presenting participants with brief scenarios that introduce an ambiguous potential threat. Critically, the ambiguity regarding how the situation is resolved remains until the last word of the scenario, which is presented as a word fragment that the participant must solve, which will then assign a benign (rather than threatening) meaning to the scenario.

Anxious Imagery Prime

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

We will test whether priming anxious concerns and feared negative outcomes on the web via the addition of a guided anxious imagery prime at the start of each session will enhance effects.

Positive Training+Neutral Imagery Prime

Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation training paired with a preceding Neutral Imagery Prime

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Training involves presenting participants with brief scenarios that introduce an ambiguous potential threat. Critically, the ambiguity regarding how the situation is resolved remains until the last word of the scenario, which is presented as a word fragment that the participant must solve, which will then assign a benign (rather than threatening) meaning to the scenario.

Neutral Imagery Prime

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

At the start of each session, participants will complete a neutral control imagery exercise where they do a guided imagery exercise imagining upcoming mundane tasks, like brushing one's teeth.

50/50 Training+Anxious Imagery Prime

50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation (half positive \& half negative scenarios) paired with a preceding Anxious Imagery Prime

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This condition follows the same design and content as the Positive Training conditions, except the word fragments differ; rather than consistently resolving the scenario in a positive direction, half of the scenarios will end with a negative (anxiety-congruent) word fragment, and half will end with a positive word fragment.

Anxious Imagery Prime

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

We will test whether priming anxious concerns and feared negative outcomes on the web via the addition of a guided anxious imagery prime at the start of each session will enhance effects.

50/50 Training+Neutral Imagery Prime

50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation (half positive \& half negative scenarios) paired with a preceding Neutral Imagery Prime

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This condition follows the same design and content as the Positive Training conditions, except the word fragments differ; rather than consistently resolving the scenario in a positive direction, half of the scenarios will end with a negative (anxiety-congruent) word fragment, and half will end with a positive word fragment.

Neutral Imagery Prime

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

At the start of each session, participants will complete a neutral control imagery exercise where they do a guided imagery exercise imagining upcoming mundane tasks, like brushing one's teeth.

No Scenario+Anxious Imagery Prime

No scenarios paired with a preceding Anxious Imagery Prime

Group Type OTHER

Anxious Imagery Prime

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

We will test whether priming anxious concerns and feared negative outcomes on the web via the addition of a guided anxious imagery prime at the start of each session will enhance effects.

No Scenario+Neutral Imagery Prime

No scenarios paired with a preceding Neutral Imagery Prime

Group Type OTHER

Neutral Imagery Prime

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

At the start of each session, participants will complete a neutral control imagery exercise where they do a guided imagery exercise imagining upcoming mundane tasks, like brushing one's teeth.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation

Training involves presenting participants with brief scenarios that introduce an ambiguous potential threat. Critically, the ambiguity regarding how the situation is resolved remains until the last word of the scenario, which is presented as a word fragment that the participant must solve, which will then assign a benign (rather than threatening) meaning to the scenario.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation

This condition follows the same design and content as the Positive Training conditions, except the word fragments differ; rather than consistently resolving the scenario in a positive direction, half of the scenarios will end with a negative (anxiety-congruent) word fragment, and half will end with a positive word fragment.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Anxious Imagery Prime

We will test whether priming anxious concerns and feared negative outcomes on the web via the addition of a guided anxious imagery prime at the start of each session will enhance effects.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Neutral Imagery Prime

At the start of each session, participants will complete a neutral control imagery exercise where they do a guided imagery exercise imagining upcoming mundane tasks, like brushing one's teeth.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ambiguous Scenarios Training

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

The target population will be adults age 18 and over who score in the moderate to extremely severe anxiety range (i.e., 10 or higher) on the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales - Short Form: Anxiety Subscale and have regular access to the Internet.

Exclusion Criteria

None listed.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Virginia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bethany A. Teachman, Ph.D.

Professor, Department of Psychology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bethany Teachman, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Virginia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MindTrails web site: https://mindtrails.virginia.edu/ (thru Univ. of Virginia)

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Steinman SA, Portnow S, Billingsley AL, Zhang D, Teachman BA. Threat and benign interpretation bias might not be a unidimensional construct. Cogn Emot. 2020 Jun;34(4):783-792. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1682973. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31650889 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-0331-00

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cognitive Training for PTSD
NCT03316196 COMPLETED NA