Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
807 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-04-30
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interpretation Training to Reduce Anxiety: Evaluating Technology-based Delivery Models and Methods to Reduce Attrition
NCT03498651
Computerized Cognitive Bias Intervention for Intolerance of Uncertainty
NCT02818296
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment and Interpretation Modification Training for Adults With Generalized Anxiety Disorder
NCT01681329
Web Based Therapist Training on Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety Disorders
NCT02089984
Attentional Bias Retraining in Veterans
NCT02041572
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Together, the current proposal will develop an infrastructure to pilot test the effectiveness of web-based CBM-I for anxiety symptoms. CBM-I training will target moderate to severe anxiety symptoms, a widespread problem area with considerable occupational and social impairment \[8\]. Participants will be visitors to Project Implicit Mental Health (PIMH), an existing website directed by the Principal Investigator that allows visitors to assess their cognitive biases tied to mental health concerns. Consistent with the RFA's priorities, this approach encourages efficiencies by capitalizing on the existing PIMH site and its heavy traffic. Further, the site's large number of visitors and use of automated assessments will make it efficient to assess baseline demographic characteristics and interpretation bias as moderators of CBM-I effects that can be tested in future trials.
Aim 1: Develop and evaluate usability and acceptability of web-based CBM-I for anxiety symptoms.
Aim 1 will build the web-based interpretation bias training program using the PIMH infrastructure. We will pilot the program on a small test group of moderate to highly anxious participants (N=15) who will complete questionnaires and semi-structured interviews to provide feedback on the programs' usability and acceptability. Further, an advisory board (N=8) of anxiety researchers, clinicians, and experts in CBM and web-based research will provide feedback on the program and study protocol. Using a "deployment-focused" approach, this feedback from experts and end-users will be used to iteratively modify the program for the trial planned for Aims 2 and 3. Thus, even at this initial pilot stage, we will measure the targeted outcome (anxiety symptoms) and mechanism (interpretation bias) to determine whether modifications to enhance target engagement are needed. Note, within Research Domain Criteria (RDoC), this outcome falls under the Potential Threat/Anxiety construct within the Negative Valence System, and the targeted mechanism (interpretation bias) falls under the Response Selection, Inhibition construct within the Cognitive (effortful) control system. Both the outcome and mechanism will be objectively measured using multiple units of analysis (e.g., behavior and self-report). Further, mechanisms underlying the guided anxious imagery prime's effects will be measured by assessing subjective distress, imagery vividness, and activation of feared outcomes following the manipulation. This prime was selected in part because of its potential to be disseminated widely in future trials, given it does not require human contact.
Aim 2: Test target engagement, feasibility and effectiveness of web-based CBM-I.
Aim 3: Evaluate the impact of an anxious prime on web-based CBM-I for anxiety symptoms.
Aims 2 and 3 will test the feasibility of an 8-session web-based interpretation training program among individuals with moderate to severe anxiety symptoms (based on screening at the PIMH site). Participants will be randomly assigned to positive CBM-I (90% positive scenario training), 50% positive/50% negative CBM-I, or a no scenario control condition. Half the participants in each of these 3 conditions will receive an anxious imagery prime prior to each training session, and half will receive a neutral imagery prime, resulting in a 3 training condition x 2 prime design (N=210; target of n=35 per condition). Feasibility will be determined by analyses of recruitment, attrition, acceptance of randomization, adherence to and appropriateness of the measurement model, caseness, extent of missing data, and safety. Additionally, target engagement (change in interpretation bias) and preliminary tests of effectiveness at reducing anxiety symptoms will be evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Positive Training+Anxious Imagery Prime
Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation training paired with a preceding Anxious Imagery Prime
Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation
Training involves presenting participants with brief scenarios that introduce an ambiguous potential threat. Critically, the ambiguity regarding how the situation is resolved remains until the last word of the scenario, which is presented as a word fragment that the participant must solve, which will then assign a benign (rather than threatening) meaning to the scenario.
Anxious Imagery Prime
We will test whether priming anxious concerns and feared negative outcomes on the web via the addition of a guided anxious imagery prime at the start of each session will enhance effects.
Positive Training+Neutral Imagery Prime
Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation training paired with a preceding Neutral Imagery Prime
Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation
Training involves presenting participants with brief scenarios that introduce an ambiguous potential threat. Critically, the ambiguity regarding how the situation is resolved remains until the last word of the scenario, which is presented as a word fragment that the participant must solve, which will then assign a benign (rather than threatening) meaning to the scenario.
Neutral Imagery Prime
At the start of each session, participants will complete a neutral control imagery exercise where they do a guided imagery exercise imagining upcoming mundane tasks, like brushing one's teeth.
50/50 Training+Anxious Imagery Prime
50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation (half positive \& half negative scenarios) paired with a preceding Anxious Imagery Prime
50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation
This condition follows the same design and content as the Positive Training conditions, except the word fragments differ; rather than consistently resolving the scenario in a positive direction, half of the scenarios will end with a negative (anxiety-congruent) word fragment, and half will end with a positive word fragment.
Anxious Imagery Prime
We will test whether priming anxious concerns and feared negative outcomes on the web via the addition of a guided anxious imagery prime at the start of each session will enhance effects.
50/50 Training+Neutral Imagery Prime
50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation (half positive \& half negative scenarios) paired with a preceding Neutral Imagery Prime
50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation
This condition follows the same design and content as the Positive Training conditions, except the word fragments differ; rather than consistently resolving the scenario in a positive direction, half of the scenarios will end with a negative (anxiety-congruent) word fragment, and half will end with a positive word fragment.
Neutral Imagery Prime
At the start of each session, participants will complete a neutral control imagery exercise where they do a guided imagery exercise imagining upcoming mundane tasks, like brushing one's teeth.
No Scenario+Anxious Imagery Prime
No scenarios paired with a preceding Anxious Imagery Prime
Anxious Imagery Prime
We will test whether priming anxious concerns and feared negative outcomes on the web via the addition of a guided anxious imagery prime at the start of each session will enhance effects.
No Scenario+Neutral Imagery Prime
No scenarios paired with a preceding Neutral Imagery Prime
Neutral Imagery Prime
At the start of each session, participants will complete a neutral control imagery exercise where they do a guided imagery exercise imagining upcoming mundane tasks, like brushing one's teeth.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Positive Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation
Training involves presenting participants with brief scenarios that introduce an ambiguous potential threat. Critically, the ambiguity regarding how the situation is resolved remains until the last word of the scenario, which is presented as a word fragment that the participant must solve, which will then assign a benign (rather than threatening) meaning to the scenario.
50/50 Cognitive Bias Modification - Interpretation
This condition follows the same design and content as the Positive Training conditions, except the word fragments differ; rather than consistently resolving the scenario in a positive direction, half of the scenarios will end with a negative (anxiety-congruent) word fragment, and half will end with a positive word fragment.
Anxious Imagery Prime
We will test whether priming anxious concerns and feared negative outcomes on the web via the addition of a guided anxious imagery prime at the start of each session will enhance effects.
Neutral Imagery Prime
At the start of each session, participants will complete a neutral control imagery exercise where they do a guided imagery exercise imagining upcoming mundane tasks, like brushing one's teeth.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Virginia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bethany A. Teachman, Ph.D.
Professor, Department of Psychology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bethany Teachman, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Virginia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MindTrails web site: https://mindtrails.virginia.edu/ (thru Univ. of Virginia)
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Steinman SA, Portnow S, Billingsley AL, Zhang D, Teachman BA. Threat and benign interpretation bias might not be a unidimensional construct. Cogn Emot. 2020 Jun;34(4):783-792. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1682973. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-0331-00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.