Risk Assessment for Postoperative Delirium

NCT ID: NCT02377115

Last Updated: 2018-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postoperative delirium (POD) - a temporary state of confusion - is a frequent complication of surgery, which most commonly occurs in elderly patients. A tablet computer application that may assist preoperative risk screening for POD was developed at the University Hospital Basel in 2014. This study aims to investigate whether the computer program may assess the risk of a patient to develop POD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Postoperative delirium (POD) - a temporary state of confusion - is a frequent complication of surgery, which most commonly occurs in elderly patients. Depending on the risk profile, 9-87% of patients are affected. Regarding the increasing age of surgical patients, prevention of POD is of even greater importance. New data lead to the assumption that medical preventive strategies may influence the frequency or at least the severity or duration of POD.

Preventive measures in patients at increased risk for developing POD could possibly be administered; however, clinical predictors for POD are rare and/or unspecific. Different scores and test batteries to assess the preoperative risk of POD have been developed, but these tools are time-consuming and require trained personnel.

In 2014, a tablet computer application was developed at the University Hospital Basel with the primary objective to assess the risk of developing POD in surgical patients. The first part records patient details, such as age, level of training, language, sensory impairment, and regular drug intake. The second part tests different cognitive functions, more precisely cognitive self-assessment, temporal orientation, episodic memory, working memory, attention, and executive functions. In contrary to already available tools, this application can be operated by the patient alone without the help of trained staff. It was tested in healthy individuals and patients with mild cognitive impairment and should now be evaluated in a clinical setting.

Study design:

Prospective observational cohort study with a derivation cohort including patients scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery.

Number of participants:

Patients will be enrolled until a collective of 50 patients with POD is reached. Each study participant in the collective of delirious patients represents 2% in the final analysis. With an expected incidence of POD of 25%, an overall sample size of about 200 patients will be recruited.

Recruitment:

Eligible study participants (patients scheduled for surgery at the University Hospital Basel) will be identified from the appointments calendar of the Anesthesia Preoperative Evaluation Clinic.

Methods:

Before surgery, participating patients perform the tablet computer application to obtain a score. A high score attained in the application suggests a low risk to develop POD. The score is then compared with results of postoperative assessments conducted daily from day 1 after surgery. Outcome measures are the Delirium-Rating-Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98), which can be used to diagnose delirium and assess its severity, the Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) Scale, and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). These assessments are repeated for 5 days until the patient is discharged or - if the patient develops delirium - until symptoms have subsided.

Endpoints:

Primary endpoint:

Correlation between the test score attained by the patient in the self-administered computerized test and the incidence of POD.

Secondary endpoint:

Correlation between the test score attained by the patient in the self-administered computerized test and the severity of POD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Delirium

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study cohort

Tablet computer application

Group Type OTHER

Tablet computer application

Intervention Type OTHER

Preoperatively, all study participants (entire cohort) will perform in the self-administered tablet computer-based tool to assess the risk of developing POD.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tablet computer application

Preoperatively, all study participants (entire cohort) will perform in the self-administered tablet computer-based tool to assess the risk of developing POD.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elective major surgery
* Age ≥65 years
* Education ≥7 years
* Fluency in German language
* Informed written consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Dementia (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) \<20 points)
* Surgical intervention that would limit verbal communication
* Cardiac surgery
* Thoracic/pulmonary surgery
* Intracranial surgery
* Former or present participation in a cognitive research project
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nicolai Goettel

Nicolai Goettel, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicolai Goettel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schrader SL, Wellik KE, Demaerschalk BM, Caselli RJ, Woodruff BK, Wingerchuk DM. Adjunctive haloperidol prophylaxis reduces postoperative delirium severity and duration in at-risk elderly patients. Neurologist. 2008 Mar;14(2):134-7. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e318166b88c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18332845 (View on PubMed)

Steiner LA. Postoperative delirium. Part 1: pathophysiology and risk factors. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Sep;28(9):628-36. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328349b7f5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21785356 (View on PubMed)

Dasgupta M, Hillier LM. Factors associated with prolonged delirium: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 May;22(3):373-94. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209991517. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20092663 (View on PubMed)

Dasgupta M, Dumbrell AC. Preoperative risk assessment for delirium after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Oct;54(10):1578-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00893.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17038078 (View on PubMed)

Parente D, Luis C, Veiga D, Silva H, Abelha F. Congestive heart failure as a determinant of postoperative delirium. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013 Sep;32(9):665-71. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24011864 (View on PubMed)

Zakriya KJ, Christmas C, Wenz JF Sr, Franckowiak S, Anderson R, Sieber FE. Preoperative factors associated with postoperative change in confusion assessment method score in hip fracture patients. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jun;94(6):1628-32, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200206000-00050.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12032042 (View on PubMed)

Kalisvaart KJ, Vreeswijk R, de Jonghe JF, van der Ploeg T, van Gool WA, Eikelenboom P. Risk factors and prediction of postoperative delirium in elderly hip-surgery patients: implementation and validation of a medical risk factor model. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):817-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00704.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16696749 (View on PubMed)

Marcantonio ER, Goldman L, Mangione CM, Ludwig LE, Muraca B, Haslauer CM, Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD, Sugarbaker DJ, Poss R, et al. A clinical prediction rule for delirium after elective noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 1994 Jan 12;271(2):134-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8264068 (View on PubMed)

Inouye SK, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI, Hurst LD, Tinetti ME. A predictive model for delirium in hospitalized elderly medical patients based on admission characteristics. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Sep 15;119(6):474-81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-6-199309150-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8357112 (View on PubMed)

Freter SH, Dunbar MJ, MacLeod H, Morrison M, MacKnight C, Rockwood K. Predicting post-operative delirium in elective orthopaedic patients: the Delirium Elderly At-Risk (DEAR) instrument. Age Ageing. 2005 Mar;34(2):169-71. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh245. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15713861 (View on PubMed)

Rudolph JL, Jones RN, Levkoff SE, Rockett C, Inouye SK, Sellke FW, Khuri SF, Lipsitz LA, Ramlawi B, Levitsky S, Marcantonio ER. Derivation and validation of a preoperative prediction rule for delirium after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2009 Jan 20;119(2):229-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.795260. Epub 2008 Dec 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19118253 (View on PubMed)

Long LS, Shapiro WA, Leung JM. A brief review of practical preoperative cognitive screening tools. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;59(8):798-804. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9737-1. Epub 2012 May 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22638676 (View on PubMed)

Egerhazi A, Berecz R, Bartok E, Degrell I. Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) in mild cognitive impairment and in Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Apr 13;31(3):746-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.01.011. Epub 2007 Jan 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17289240 (View on PubMed)

Erlanger DM, Kaushik T, Broshek D, Freeman J, Feldman D, Festa J. Development and validation of a web-based screening tool for monitoring cognitive status. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002 Oct;17(5):458-76. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200210000-00007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12802255 (View on PubMed)

Fillit HM, Simon ES, Doniger GM, Cummings JL. Practicality of a computerized system for cognitive assessment in the elderly. Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Jan;4(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.09.008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18631946 (View on PubMed)

Levinson D, Reeves D, Watson J, Harrison M. Automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM) measures of cognitive effects of Alzheimer's disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 May;20(3):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.09.001.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15797175 (View on PubMed)

Saxton J, Morrow L, Eschman A, Archer G, Luther J, Zuccolotto A. Computer assessment of mild cognitive impairment. Postgrad Med. 2009 Mar;121(2):177-85. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.03.1990.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19332976 (View on PubMed)

Falleti MG, Maruff P, Collie A, Darby DG. Practice effects associated with the repeated assessment of cognitive function using the CogState battery at 10-minute, one week and one month test-retest intervals. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;28(7):1095-112. doi: 10.1080/13803390500205718.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16840238 (View on PubMed)

Tornatore JB, Hill E, Laboff JA, McGann ME. Self-administered screening for mild cognitive impairment: initial validation of a computerized test battery. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005 Winter;17(1):98-105. doi: 10.1176/jnp.17.1.98.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15746489 (View on PubMed)

Wild K, Howieson D, Webbe F, Seelye A, Kaye J. Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review. Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Nov;4(6):428-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19012868 (View on PubMed)

Elwood RW. MicroCog: assessment of cognitive functioning. Neuropsychol Rev. 2001 Jun;11(2):89-100. doi: 10.1023/a:1016671201211.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11572473 (View on PubMed)

Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):623-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.007. Epub 2006 Oct 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17014981 (View on PubMed)

Iverson GL, Brooks BL, Ashton VL, Johnson LG, Gualtieri CT. Does familiarity with computers affect computerized neuropsychological test performance? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009 Jul;31(5):594-604. doi: 10.1080/13803390802372125. Epub 2008 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18972312 (View on PubMed)

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1202204 (View on PubMed)

Trzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, Kanary K, Norton J, Jimerson N. Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001 Spring;13(2):229-42. doi: 10.1176/jnp.13.2.229.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11449030 (View on PubMed)

Fratiglioni L, Jorm AF, Grut M, Viitanen M, Holmen K, Ahlbom A, Winblad B. Predicting dementia from the Mini-Mental State Examination in an elderly population: the role of education. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Mar;46(3):281-7. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90076-d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8455053 (View on PubMed)

Adamis D, Rooney S, Meagher D, Mulligan O, McCarthy G. A comparison of delirium diagnosis in elderly medical inpatients using the CAM, DRS-R98, DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Jun;27(6):883-9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002853. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25601222 (View on PubMed)

Grover S, Kate N. Assessment scales for delirium: A review. World J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug 22;2(4):58-70. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v2.i4.58.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24175169 (View on PubMed)

Carvalho JP, de Almeida AR, Gusmao-Flores D. Delirium rating scales in critically ill patients: a systematic literature review. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2013 Apr-Jun;25(2):148-54. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20130026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23917980 (View on PubMed)

Koster S, Hensens AG, Oosterveld FG, Wijma A, van der Palen J. The delirium observation screening scale recognizes delirium early after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Oct;8(4):309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19285452 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RAPID

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.