Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predictors for Postoperative Delirium After Major Noncardiac Surgery in Adults
NCT04460716
Digitalized Clinical Decision Support for the Prevention of Postoperative Delirium (POD)
NCT06445153
Predictors for Postoperative Delirium After Cardiac Surgery in Adults: a One-year, Single Center, Observational Cohort Study
NCT02613845
Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery During Perioperative Period
NCT07314762
Postoperative Delirium in Cardiac Surgery ICU
NCT04527341
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Postoperative delirium (POD) - a temporary state of confusion - is a frequent complication of surgery, which most commonly occurs in elderly patients. Depending on the risk profile, 9-87% of patients are affected. Regarding the increasing age of surgical patients, prevention of POD is of even greater importance. New data lead to the assumption that medical preventive strategies may influence the frequency or at least the severity or duration of POD.
Preventive measures in patients at increased risk for developing POD could possibly be administered; however, clinical predictors for POD are rare and/or unspecific. Different scores and test batteries to assess the preoperative risk of POD have been developed, but these tools are time-consuming and require trained personnel.
In 2014, a tablet computer application was developed at the University Hospital Basel with the primary objective to assess the risk of developing POD in surgical patients. The first part records patient details, such as age, level of training, language, sensory impairment, and regular drug intake. The second part tests different cognitive functions, more precisely cognitive self-assessment, temporal orientation, episodic memory, working memory, attention, and executive functions. In contrary to already available tools, this application can be operated by the patient alone without the help of trained staff. It was tested in healthy individuals and patients with mild cognitive impairment and should now be evaluated in a clinical setting.
Study design:
Prospective observational cohort study with a derivation cohort including patients scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery.
Number of participants:
Patients will be enrolled until a collective of 50 patients with POD is reached. Each study participant in the collective of delirious patients represents 2% in the final analysis. With an expected incidence of POD of 25%, an overall sample size of about 200 patients will be recruited.
Recruitment:
Eligible study participants (patients scheduled for surgery at the University Hospital Basel) will be identified from the appointments calendar of the Anesthesia Preoperative Evaluation Clinic.
Methods:
Before surgery, participating patients perform the tablet computer application to obtain a score. A high score attained in the application suggests a low risk to develop POD. The score is then compared with results of postoperative assessments conducted daily from day 1 after surgery. Outcome measures are the Delirium-Rating-Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98), which can be used to diagnose delirium and assess its severity, the Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) Scale, and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). These assessments are repeated for 5 days until the patient is discharged or - if the patient develops delirium - until symptoms have subsided.
Endpoints:
Primary endpoint:
Correlation between the test score attained by the patient in the self-administered computerized test and the incidence of POD.
Secondary endpoint:
Correlation between the test score attained by the patient in the self-administered computerized test and the severity of POD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study cohort
Tablet computer application
Tablet computer application
Preoperatively, all study participants (entire cohort) will perform in the self-administered tablet computer-based tool to assess the risk of developing POD.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tablet computer application
Preoperatively, all study participants (entire cohort) will perform in the self-administered tablet computer-based tool to assess the risk of developing POD.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥65 years
* Education ≥7 years
* Fluency in German language
* Informed written consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgical intervention that would limit verbal communication
* Cardiac surgery
* Thoracic/pulmonary surgery
* Intracranial surgery
* Former or present participation in a cognitive research project
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicolai Goettel
Nicolai Goettel, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicolai Goettel, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Basel
Basel, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schrader SL, Wellik KE, Demaerschalk BM, Caselli RJ, Woodruff BK, Wingerchuk DM. Adjunctive haloperidol prophylaxis reduces postoperative delirium severity and duration in at-risk elderly patients. Neurologist. 2008 Mar;14(2):134-7. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e318166b88c.
Steiner LA. Postoperative delirium. Part 1: pathophysiology and risk factors. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Sep;28(9):628-36. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328349b7f5.
Dasgupta M, Hillier LM. Factors associated with prolonged delirium: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 May;22(3):373-94. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209991517. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
Dasgupta M, Dumbrell AC. Preoperative risk assessment for delirium after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Oct;54(10):1578-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00893.x.
Parente D, Luis C, Veiga D, Silva H, Abelha F. Congestive heart failure as a determinant of postoperative delirium. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013 Sep;32(9):665-71. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
Zakriya KJ, Christmas C, Wenz JF Sr, Franckowiak S, Anderson R, Sieber FE. Preoperative factors associated with postoperative change in confusion assessment method score in hip fracture patients. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jun;94(6):1628-32, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200206000-00050.
Kalisvaart KJ, Vreeswijk R, de Jonghe JF, van der Ploeg T, van Gool WA, Eikelenboom P. Risk factors and prediction of postoperative delirium in elderly hip-surgery patients: implementation and validation of a medical risk factor model. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):817-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00704.x.
Marcantonio ER, Goldman L, Mangione CM, Ludwig LE, Muraca B, Haslauer CM, Donaldson MC, Whittemore AD, Sugarbaker DJ, Poss R, et al. A clinical prediction rule for delirium after elective noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 1994 Jan 12;271(2):134-9.
Inouye SK, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI, Hurst LD, Tinetti ME. A predictive model for delirium in hospitalized elderly medical patients based on admission characteristics. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Sep 15;119(6):474-81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-6-199309150-00005.
Freter SH, Dunbar MJ, MacLeod H, Morrison M, MacKnight C, Rockwood K. Predicting post-operative delirium in elective orthopaedic patients: the Delirium Elderly At-Risk (DEAR) instrument. Age Ageing. 2005 Mar;34(2):169-71. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh245. No abstract available.
Rudolph JL, Jones RN, Levkoff SE, Rockett C, Inouye SK, Sellke FW, Khuri SF, Lipsitz LA, Ramlawi B, Levitsky S, Marcantonio ER. Derivation and validation of a preoperative prediction rule for delirium after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2009 Jan 20;119(2):229-36. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.795260. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
Long LS, Shapiro WA, Leung JM. A brief review of practical preoperative cognitive screening tools. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;59(8):798-804. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9737-1. Epub 2012 May 26.
Egerhazi A, Berecz R, Bartok E, Degrell I. Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB) in mild cognitive impairment and in Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Apr 13;31(3):746-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.01.011. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
Erlanger DM, Kaushik T, Broshek D, Freeman J, Feldman D, Festa J. Development and validation of a web-based screening tool for monitoring cognitive status. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002 Oct;17(5):458-76. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200210000-00007.
Fillit HM, Simon ES, Doniger GM, Cummings JL. Practicality of a computerized system for cognitive assessment in the elderly. Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Jan;4(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.09.008.
Levinson D, Reeves D, Watson J, Harrison M. Automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM) measures of cognitive effects of Alzheimer's disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005 May;20(3):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.09.001.
Saxton J, Morrow L, Eschman A, Archer G, Luther J, Zuccolotto A. Computer assessment of mild cognitive impairment. Postgrad Med. 2009 Mar;121(2):177-85. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.03.1990.
Falleti MG, Maruff P, Collie A, Darby DG. Practice effects associated with the repeated assessment of cognitive function using the CogState battery at 10-minute, one week and one month test-retest intervals. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;28(7):1095-112. doi: 10.1080/13803390500205718.
Tornatore JB, Hill E, Laboff JA, McGann ME. Self-administered screening for mild cognitive impairment: initial validation of a computerized test battery. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005 Winter;17(1):98-105. doi: 10.1176/jnp.17.1.98.
Wild K, Howieson D, Webbe F, Seelye A, Kaye J. Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review. Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Nov;4(6):428-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.003.
Elwood RW. MicroCog: assessment of cognitive functioning. Neuropsychol Rev. 2001 Jun;11(2):89-100. doi: 10.1023/a:1016671201211.
Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):623-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.007. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
Iverson GL, Brooks BL, Ashton VL, Johnson LG, Gualtieri CT. Does familiarity with computers affect computerized neuropsychological test performance? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009 Jul;31(5):594-604. doi: 10.1080/13803390802372125. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
Trzepacz PT, Mittal D, Torres R, Kanary K, Norton J, Jimerson N. Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: comparison with the delirium rating scale and the cognitive test for delirium. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001 Spring;13(2):229-42. doi: 10.1176/jnp.13.2.229.
Fratiglioni L, Jorm AF, Grut M, Viitanen M, Holmen K, Ahlbom A, Winblad B. Predicting dementia from the Mini-Mental State Examination in an elderly population: the role of education. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Mar;46(3):281-7. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90076-d.
Adamis D, Rooney S, Meagher D, Mulligan O, McCarthy G. A comparison of delirium diagnosis in elderly medical inpatients using the CAM, DRS-R98, DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Jun;27(6):883-9. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002853. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
Grover S, Kate N. Assessment scales for delirium: A review. World J Psychiatry. 2012 Aug 22;2(4):58-70. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v2.i4.58.
Carvalho JP, de Almeida AR, Gusmao-Flores D. Delirium rating scales in critically ill patients: a systematic literature review. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2013 Apr-Jun;25(2):148-54. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20130026.
Koster S, Hensens AG, Oosterveld FG, Wijma A, van der Palen J. The delirium observation screening scale recognizes delirium early after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Oct;8(4):309-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RAPID
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.