Responsiveness and Minimal Clinical Important Difference of the Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire for Physiotherapists
NCT ID: NCT02346279
Last Updated: 2015-01-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
81 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-04-30
2013-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Innovative Physiotherapy and Coordination of Care for People With MS: a RCT and a Qualitative Study
NCT02522962
Functional Disorders of the Musculoskeletal System in People With Multiple Sclerosis
NCT04973501
The Effect of Neurorehabilitation Therapy on Postural Control, Mobility and Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
NCT03424538
Effect of Motor Cognitive Interference on Cognition and Quality of Life on Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
NCT06839924
WEB-Based Physiotherapy for People With Multiple Sclerosis
NCT02508961
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This multicenter study uses a convenience sample of 81 PwMS, who are in short or long term treatment widespread over Switzerland. At baseline, the testers record age, gender, type of MS and disease duration since diagnosis. The tests will be executed in the following order: six-meter Timed Walking Test (6MTWT), nine-hole peg test (9HPT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), MSQPT, Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Transition Questionnaires for the Patient and the treating physiotherapist. Finally the six-minute walk (6MWT) rest will be carried out. The intervention with long term patients was planned every next 6 months after the baseline testing (T1, T2 and T3). The short time patient will be tested at base line and after 3 to 4 months or at the end of the rehabilitation period (T1).
A standardized test protocol manual will be used by the experienced and trained testers.
Effect Size , Standardized Response Mean (SRM). Modified SRM (MSRM), Relative Efficiency (RE), Sensitivity and Specificity and correlation estimates will describe the anchor based responsiveness. The combined anchor and distribution based approach is used in search of a MCID. The distribution based approach uses statistics like Standard Deviation, Standard Error of Measurement and Minimal Detectable Change as indicators of MCID. The anchor based approach uses global ratings of change out of the perspective of the patient and the physiotherapist for different aspects of health: general health status, balance, walking ability, arm function, fatigue, pain, amount of being active, participation in social life and general impairment due to MS. Minimal change is defined as one to two gradient change on the 9 point scale of the transition questions. The expected wide range of MCIDs will be narrowed to a small range or single MCID by triangulation and selection of the MCID with best selectivity and specificity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Persons in physical therapy treatment
Questionnaires (MSQPT, HAQUAMS, Transition Questionnaire for Patient and treating physiotherapist), physical tests (9HPT, 6MTWT, BBS, 6MWT), EDSS
Questionnaires, EDSS, physical test
6 Meter timed walking test, Nine Hole Peg Test, Berg balance Scale, MSQPT, HAQUAMS, Transition Questionnaire for Patients, Transition Questionnaire for Therapists, EDSS, 6 Minute Walking Test
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaires, EDSS, physical test
6 Meter timed walking test, Nine Hole Peg Test, Berg balance Scale, MSQPT, HAQUAMS, Transition Questionnaire for Patients, Transition Questionnaire for Therapists, EDSS, 6 Minute Walking Test
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Schweizer Physiotherapie Verband physioswiss
UNKNOWN
Schweizerische Multiple Sklerose Gesellschaft
OTHER
Institut fuer Physiotherapieforschung
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nanco van der Maas
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut für Physiotherapieforschung
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):i-iv, 1-74. No abstract available.
Gold SM, Heesen C, Schulz H, Guder U, Monch A, Gbadamosi J, Buhmann C, Schulz KH. Disease specific quality of life instruments in multiple sclerosis: validation of the Hamburg Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis (HAQUAMS). Mult Scler. 2001 Apr;7(2):119-30. doi: 10.1177/135245850100700208.
Learmonth YC, Paul L, McFadyen AK, Mattison P, Miller L. Reliability and clinical significance of mobility and balance assessments in multiple sclerosis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012 Mar;35(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328350b65f.
Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
Wyrwich KW, Norquist JM, Lenderking WR, Acaster S; Industry Advisory Committee of International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL). Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2013 Apr;22(3):475-83. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0175-x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
van der Maas NA. Patient-reported questionnaires in MS rehabilitation: responsiveness and minimal important difference of the multiple sclerosis questionnaire for physiotherapists (MSQPT). BMC Neurol. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0834-1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Responsivität und MCID MSQPT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.