Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) vs Observation in Stage III NSCLC
NCT01282437
Prognostic Evaluation of Tumor Volume and Its Changes in Radical Radiotherapy of Advanced NSCLC
NCT03055715
Multimodal Hypoxia Imaging and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Inoperable Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
NCT01617980
PET-guided Radiotherapy for Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer.
NCT06247163
Hippocampal-Sparing Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Pathologically Nodal Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
NCT02448992
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) results in a 2-3 fold lower incidence of brain metastasis. However, randomized studies have failed to demonstrate improved overall survival (OS) after PCI.
One of the major weaknesses of these trials is the unselected mixed pool of stage III patients (stage III A and B, lymph node status N0 to N2, squamous and non-squamous histology etc.). A broad variety of studies have shown that a certain subset of patients with NSCLC (e.g. cancers with adenocarcinoma histology, multilevel nodal involvement) are at highest risk for brain metastases. Furthermore, the risk for brain metastases appears to be specifically higher in younger patients (age \<60 years), although this collective commonly undergoes more frequently chemotherapy and/or more aggressive regimens than elderly patients.
Prevention of CNS metastases, even for LA-NSCLC patients with other sites of failure, will improve quality of life and, for patients controlled extracranially, will improve survival. Meta analyses performed on data from several Radiation Treatment Oncology Group (RTOG) studies have shown that longer survival for patients with LA-NSCLC treated with either radiation alone or radiochemotherapy is associated with an increased incidence of CNS metastases. Although the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy reduces extracranial distant metastases and improves survival it does not alter brain relapse rates. Even though the addition of modern targeted therapy using small-molecules or antibodies may further improve the outcome, the CNS remains the most common site of failure under targeted therapy, although no evidence for resistance in histological workups of metastases has been found. This emphasizes the urgent need for treatment directed at chemotherapeutically inaccessible (or dormant) micrometastases that are a priori dispersed within the brain. As the median time for relapse in the CNS is approximately 6 months after first-line therapy, the treatment of micrometastases should be meaningfully initiated even during or shortly after first-line therapy.
Irradiation of the brain does not only bear the risk of inducing acute (partially mass-associated) side effects such as nausea, vomiting and fatigue, but also causes long-term neurocognitive deficits. Although neurocognitive disorders after PCI/Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) also have a multifactorial etiology based on a patient's individual medical history (preceding chemotherapy, pre-existing vascular damage e.g. from smoking, local reactions/edema), it is currently believed that they are mostly caused by a loss of neural stem cells in the hippocampal areas. Multipotent and self-renewing neural stem cells are found in the subgranular zone of the adult hippocampus and in the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricles. The hippocampus plays an important role in memory consolidation and emotional learning (contextual fear conditioning). The disruption of neurogenesis in the subgranular zone or damage to the hippocampus can lead to impaired short- and long-term memory, learning and contextual fear conditioning. In line with this, irradiating the brain decreases neurogenesis in the hippocampus which leads to impaired hippocampal-dependent learning and memory.
To prevent radiation-induced loss of neuronal stem cells, hippocampus-sparing (HS) radiation techniques have been developed and efficacy has been demonstrated in the recently published phase II RTOG 0933 study. The trial included patients with brain metastases and a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) of 70%. Following HS-WBRT the patients showed a relative neurocognitive function (NCF) decline of 7% four months after HS-WBRT, which is more than four times less than observed in studies with conventional WBRT (30%; p\<0.001).
Since the study was a one-arm study without a control, the reported hippocampal failure rate of 4.5% remains controversially discussed. Multiple studies described the hippocampus and limbic circuit to be a generally rare site of brain metastases in many cancers. NSCLC shows a specifically low rate of hippocampal brain metastasis (2.8% of all brain metastases) and risk modelling revealed a only slightly increased absolute risk (+0.2%) after HS-WBRT. Thus, since in the treatment of NSCLC, the efficient prevention of BM and potential CNS micrometastases is currently outweighed by the associated neurotoxicity and a lack of survival benefit, HS-WBRT may provide a possibility to tip the scale toward prophylactic WBRT, at least for a specific subgroup at high risk.
Radiation regimens for PCI that have influenced patterns of CNS failures in NSCLC have included total doses of 20-36 Gy and fraction sizes of 2-3 Gy. A fraction size of 2 Gy and a total dose of 30 Gy was chosen for the RTOG 0214 study of PCI in LA-NSCLC. This regimen has been shown to decrease CNS metastases from 54% to 13% with no difference in NCF decline in PCI versus non-PCI patients at 4 years. In addition, although there is paucity of clinical data from WBRT with doses in the EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions) range of 10-20 Gy, a dose-response curve providing a 'best fit' model suggests an only minimal benefit from doses above 30 Gy (EQD2).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HS-PCI
Hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions)
HS-PCI
Hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation with 25 Gy in 10 fractions
Observation
Observation
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HS-PCI
Hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation with 25 Gy in 10 fractions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Clinical Stage III with lymph node stage N1-N3
3. Stable disease or any response after definitive or adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy (defined by local standards)
4. No more than 8 weeks after completion of prior radio(chemo)therapy
5. Any acute/subacute ≥ grade 3 toxicities from previous therapy must have resolved to ≤ grade 2 at the time of study entry
6. Age ≥ 18 years and \< 75 years
7. ECOG Performance Status ≤ 1
8. Signed study-specific informed consent prior to study entry.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Evidence of progressive disease at the time of study entry
3. Brain or leptomeningeal metastases (cMRI not older than 2 weeks)
4. Evidence of extracranial distant metastatic disease
5. Prior cranial irradiation
6. Patients enrolled in other clinical studies that apply or test lung cancer-directed investigational agents/procedures
7. Patients with synchronous or prior malignancy, other than non-melanomatous skin cancer unless disease free greater than 3 years
8. Pregnant women are ineligible as treatment involves unforeseeable risks to the participant and to the embryo or fetus; patients with childbearing potential must practice appropriate contraception.
9. Patients that are unable to undergo repetitive MRI scans
10. Medical conditions that contra-indicate intensive neurocognitive testing (e.g., history of mental retardation, aphasia of any kind, hearing impairment)
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Frederik Wenz
Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frederik Wenz, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim
Frank A. Giordano, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Mannheim
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gondi V, Pugh SL, Tome WA, Caine C, Corn B, Kanner A, Rowley H, Kundapur V, DeNittis A, Greenspoon JN, Konski AA, Bauman GS, Shah S, Shi W, Wendland M, Kachnic L, Mehta MP. Preservation of memory with conformal avoidance of the hippocampal neural stem-cell compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (RTOG 0933): a phase II multi-institutional trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 1;32(34):3810-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2909. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
Ghia A, Tome WA, Thomas S, Cannon G, Khuntia D, Kuo JS, Mehta MP. Distribution of brain metastases in relation to the hippocampus: implications for neurocognitive functional preservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):971-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.016. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
Harth S, Abo-Madyan Y, Zheng L, Siebenlist K, Herskind C, Wenz F, Giordano FA. Estimation of intracranial failure risk following hippocampal-sparing whole brain radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Oct;109(1):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
Gore EM, Bae K, Wong SJ, Sun A, Bonner JA, Schild SE, Gaspar LE, Bogart JA, Werner-Wasik M, Choy H. Phase III comparison of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus observation in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: primary analysis of radiation therapy oncology group study RTOG 0214. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan 20;29(3):272-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.1609. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
Giordano FA, Welzel G, Abo-Madyan Y, Wenz F. Potential toxicities of prophylactic cranial irradiation. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2012 Dec;1(4):254-62. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2012.10.03.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HIPPO-S
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.