Individualized Dose Prescription in Advanced Stage Lung Cancer Patients Using Modern (Chemo)Radiotherapy
NCT ID: NCT01577212
Last Updated: 2015-11-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2014-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radiotherapy for NSCLC to a Individualized MLD
NCT00573040
Study of Interest of Personalized Radiotherapy Dose Redistribution in Patients With Stage III NSCLC
NCT02473133
Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT03481114
Prognostic Evaluation of Tumor Volume and Its Changes in Radical Radiotherapy of Advanced NSCLC
NCT03055715
Safety Study of Individualised Radiation Dose Determination for Lung Cancer Patients.
NCT00181545
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is widely accepted that surgery provides the best chance of cure in patients with operable NSCLC (www.oncoline.nl). In practice, only 20% of patients are amenable for tumor resection with curative intent. Alternatively, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) results in excellent local control in localized early stage disease.
In locally advanced, inoperable disease, combined chemotherapy and external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) are increasingly being used. Evidence suggests that concurrent schedules are more effective than sequential treatments despite increased toxicity, although the true magnitude of the additional benefit remains uncertain. However, a large number of patients with locally advanced NSCLC is not suitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy due to their general condition, age, comorbidity or tumor-related factors. Therefore, there is a need to increase effectiveness of treatment for all patients with advanced stage NSCLC undergoing either radiotherapy alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, or concurrent treatment.
Apart from the addition of chemotherapy, treatment modification by intensification of the radiotherapy schedule or by dose escalation has been proven beneficial. Several phase I/II trials explored altered EBRT fractionation schedules that increased the biological effective dose to the primary tumor and reduced local relapse rate. Thereby, two main principles were pursued: reduction of the dose per fraction (≤ 1.8 Gy), giving two or three fractions per day (so-called hyperfractionation), aimed at sparing normal tissues while increasing the dose to the primary tumor; increase of the fraction dose (≥ 2 Gy), combined with a reduction in the total number of fractions (so-called hypofractionation) aimed at increasing the effective tumor dose in less radiation-sensitive primary tumors. On the one hand, hyperfractionation limits the treatment-related side-effects, on the other hypofractionation is attractive for the patient and radiation department as the number of treatment fractions can be reduced.
Intensification of the irradiation schedule by continuous, hyperfractionated radiotherapy (CHART) delivered in 12 consecutive days showed an absolute improvement in two-year survival. With the advent of highly conformal dose planning and delivery techniques during the last decade (i.e., 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, 3D-CRT; intensity-modulated radiation therapy, IMRT; volumetric-modulated arc therapy, VMAT/RapidArc; Tomotherapy), organ-sparing technology became widely available. Recently, van Baardwijk and collaborators published an individualized dose prescription study in 166 stage-III NSCLC patients. Already in 2006, Belderbos et al. reported favorable toxicity data and an encouraging failure-free interval in 88 inoperable NSCLC patients treated with intensified, hypofractionated 3D-CRT based on the MTD to the lung.
Apart from these reported studies, there are three hypofractionation trials being conducted elsewhere. In the UK, two 3D-CRT based phase I/II trials have been approved investigating individualized dose escalation based on normal tissue dose constraints in patients with stage II or stage III NSCLC (ISRCTN12155469 and I-START; CRUK/10/005). In the US, the University of Wisconsin is conducting a helical tomotherapy-based hypofractionation study (NCT00214123) with pulmonary toxicity (pneumonitis grade 3 lasting for more than 2 weeks) as primary endpoint.
The reported hypo- and hyperfractionation studies have a 'trial-and-error' approach for dose-level estimation in common. In a recent in silico trial in 26 stage III NSCLC patients, we have investigated the use of a dedicated software tool for individual dose escalation by hypofractionation. Based on an existing, clinical IMRT/VMAT treatment plan (66 Gy in 33 fractions), radiation dose was escalated by scaling the radiation dose until the maximum tolerated dose constraints for the healthy lung, the esophagus, spinal cord, brachial plexus or heart was met. The aim of this present study is to test the feasibility and toxicity of individualized hypofractionated radiotherapy, and to report outcome data. In case this phase II trial has favorable results, a phase II/III trial on maximally tolerable, individualized, hypofractionated radiotherapy within a shorter overall-treatment time is aimed for.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Individualized dose escalation
Individualized dose escalation on the basis of the dose to the organs at risk.
Individualized dose escalation
Individualized dose escalation on the basis of the maximally tolerable dose to organs at risk - lung, esophagus, spinal cord, heart, brachial plexus
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Individualized dose escalation
Individualized dose escalation on the basis of the maximally tolerable dose to organs at risk - lung, esophagus, spinal cord, heart, brachial plexus
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Irresectable disease (as assessed by multidisciplinary team) or patient refusing surgery
3. Disease which can be encompassed within a radical radiotherapy treatment plan in keeping with standard practice at the participating center
4. Proposed treatment consists of radiotherapy alone or concurrent chemoradiation
5. WHO performance status 0 or 1
6. Adequate respiratory function: FEV1 ≥ 1.5 L and DLCO \> 40%, predicted on baseline pulmonary function tests
7. Age ≥ 18 years, no upper age limit
8. Estimated life expectancy of more than 6 months
9. Patient is available for follow-up
10. Written informed consent obtained
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous or current malignant disease likely to interfere with the protocol treatment or comparisons
3. Prior thoracic radiotherapy
4. Proposed treatment consist of sequential chemoradiation
5. Prior lobectomy / pneumonectomy
6. Prior chemotherapy using gemcitabine or bleomycine
7. Superior sulcus tumors if the brachial plexus is within the high-dose volume
8. Medically unstable (e.g., ischaemic heart disease, esophageal disorders)
9. Pregnancy
10. Connective tissue disorders
11. Abnormal kidney function interfering with administration of iv contrast agent (GFR\<60)
12. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus hampering 18FDG-PET
13. Inability to comply with protocol or trial procedures
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jan Bussink
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jan Bussink, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Esther GC Troost, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Robin Wijsman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Aswin L Hoffmann, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL nr 35536.091.11
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CMO 2011/345
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.