Effect of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation on Recurrent Rate of Patients With Recurrentstones in Bile Duct

NCT ID: NCT02330601

Last Updated: 2023-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-01

Study Completion Date

2021-06-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The recurrent rate of CBDS in patients with recurrent CBDS is high. It was reported that up to 60% of patients had stone recurrence within two years after stone retrieval by ERCP. Although EPLBD is useful for for extraction of large CBDS with less operation time and mechanical lithotripsy.It is not known whether EPLBD could prevent the recurrence in patients with recurrent CBDS.Although Harada et al found that EPLBD might reduce the short-term recurrence of CBD stones in patients with previous ES. It is a retrospective study with a small sample size (n=94).

Here a prospective, randomized controlled study including two tertiary centers was designed. The aim of this study was to investigate whether EPLBD could reduce the recurrence rate in patients with recurrent CBDS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

The papilla orifice could be enlarged by asphincterotomeif necessary. The stones were retrieved by a basket or a retrieval balloon

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

EPLBD group

a CRE balloon (diameter 10, 11, 12, 13.5, 15 mm; Boston Scientific) was chosen according to the diameter of bile duct. It was placed across the papilla orifice and then gradually filled with diluted contrast. When the waist disappeared, the balloon was kept inflated for 120s. The stones were then retrieved by a basket or a retrieval balloon.Mechanical lithotripsy was used if necessary

Group Type OTHER

endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For the patients in EPLBD group, a CRE balloon (diameter 10, 11, 12, 13.5, 15 mm; Boston Scientific) was chosen according to the diameter of bile duct. It was placed across the papilla orifice and then gradually filled with diluted contrast. When the waist disappeared, the balloon was kept inflated for 120s. The stones were then retrieved by a basket or a retrieval balloon.Mechanical lithotripsy was used if necessary

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation

For the patients in EPLBD group, a CRE balloon (diameter 10, 11, 12, 13.5, 15 mm; Boston Scientific) was chosen according to the diameter of bile duct. It was placed across the papilla orifice and then gradually filled with diluted contrast. When the waist disappeared, the balloon was kept inflated for 120s. The stones were then retrieved by a basket or a retrieval balloon.Mechanical lithotripsy was used if necessary

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EPLBD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18-80
2. Patients with recurrent CBDS after ERCP

Exclusion Criteria

1. Benign or malignant CBD stricture
2. Recurrent stone within 3 months after ERCP
3. Previous endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD)
4. Prior surgery of Bismuth II and Roux-en-Y
5. Septic shock
6. Coagulopathy (INR\>1.3), platelet\<50000 or using anti-coagulation drugs
7. With expected life span less than 24 months
8. Pregnant women
9. Refusal or unable to give written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Air Force Military Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yanglin Pan

Associated professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yanglin Pan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases.The Fourth Military Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

The First Affiliated Hospital Of Xi'an Jiaotong University

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yoon HG, Moon JH, Choi HJ, Kim DC, Kang MS, Lee TH, Cha SW, Cho YD, Park SH, Kim SJ. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the management of recurrent difficult bile duct stones after previous endoscopic sphincterotomy. Dig Endosc. 2014 Mar;26(2):259-63. doi: 10.1111/den.12102. Epub 2013 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23581623 (View on PubMed)

Stefanidis G, Viazis N, Pleskow D, Manolakopoulos S, Theocharis L, Christodoulou C, Kotsikoros N, Giannousis J, Sgouros S, Rodias M, Katsikani A, Chuttani R. Large balloon dilation vs. mechanical lithotripsy for the management of large bile duct stones: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;106(2):278-85. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.421. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21045816 (View on PubMed)

Wang X, Wang X, Sun H, Ren G, Wang B, Liang S, Zhang L, Kang X, Tao Q, Guo X, Luo H, Pan Y. Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Reduces Further Recurrence in Patients With Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 May 1;117(5):740-747. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001690. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35191430 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20140424-6

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.