The Effect of Different Duration of Bolloon Dilation During ESBD

NCT ID: NCT02958618

Last Updated: 2016-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-30

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Limited endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation(ESBD)is a promising technique in treating common bile duct stones. It had the similar success rate of stone extraction, but its incidence of complications remained uncertain. However, there is no clinical evidence and guideline to define the optimal duration of balloon dilation so far. So we designed a prospective randomized trial to compare the effect of three different duration of balloon dilation during ESBD so that we can find the optimal duration of the balloon dilation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Common Bile duct stones is one of the most common diseases of which the present incidence is 0.5% -3% in China. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is the most frequently used endoscopic technique for clearance of stones since the first description in 1974. Although EST is minimally invasive, it brings postoperative complications such as bleeding, perforation and acute pancreatitis. The overall complication and mortality is about 11.7-23% and 0.5%, respectively. Moreover, most believe EST can cause permanent sphincter of Oddi(SO) dysfunction which can result in biliary infection, stone recurrence and malignancies.

As an alternative method to EST, Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) was described by Staritz et al for the management of CBD stones. EPBD can preserve SO function and avoid undesirable effects due to an incompetent sphincter. It is reported that the basic SO function can be restored in one month after EPBD. Nonetheless, EPBD is indicated for the stones smaller than 12mm in diameters because the biliary orifice is enlarged to a lesser extent compared with EST. Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative pancreatitis reaches up to 15-30%. These disadvantages limit the application of EPBD.

As a result, Ersoz et al started a combined technique in 2003, which is called Endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation(ESBD). ESBD can preserve SO function, reduce the adverse events, increase the stone removal rate. Especially, it can be applied for the stones larger than 12mm in diameters with large balloon dilatation. When ESBD is being performed, the duration of dilation is one of the most important factors affecting the postoperative complications. Whereas, there are issues regarding this technique that need further evaluation, such as the optimal duration of EPBD after EST. Some believe that short-term dilation can achieve the desired results and the duration of balloon dilation is not significantly correlated with postoperative pancreatitis, while opponents believe that although the small sphincterotomy is performed, short-term dilation has not been able to fully relax the residual sphincter. For long-term complications of ESBD, including the incidence of cholangitis, biliary stones recurrence rate, the incidence of biliary stenosis, there is no relative report either.

This prospective, randomized, controlled trial is designed to compare the difference of efficacy and morbidity among three different duration of balloon dilation(30s,60s,180s) after endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of common bile duct stones. We hope that it will be helpful to establish the reasonable operation guidelines of ESBD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Common Bile Duct Stones

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Duration for 30" group

A limited sphincterotomy measuring up to one-third of the size of the papilla was first performed. Dilation with a controlled radial expansion (CRE) balloon (diameter 10, 12, 15, 18 ) was performed after the sphincterotomy. The balloon was centered at the sphincter and gradually filled with diluted contrast under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance until waisting was abolished. Once the waist had disappeared, the balloon was kept in position for 30 seconds. The stones were then removed by a basket or retrieval balloon. An ENBD catheter (.) was routinely placed into the CBD after stone removal.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

30" group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A limited sphincterotomy (EST) was performed prior to the EPBD.The length of the sphincterotomy incision was limited to a third of the size of the papilla. A CRE balloon (diameter 10, 12, 15, 18) was chosen according to the diameter of bile duct. The balloon was then gradually filled with diluted contrast medium under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance to observe the disappearance of the waist. Once the waist disappeared, the balloon remained inflated for 30 seconds. The stones were then retrieved by a basket or retrieval balloon. An ENBD catheter (.) was routinely placed into the CBD after stone removal.

Duration for 60" group

A limited sphincterotomy measuring up to one-third of the size of the papilla was first performed. Dilation with a controlled radial expansion (CRE) balloon (diameter 10, 12, 15, 18 ) was performed after the sphincterotomy. The balloon was centered at the sphincter and gradually filled with diluted contrast under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance until waisting was abolished. Once the waist had disappeared, the balloon was kept in position for 60 seconds. The stones were then removed by a basket or retrieval balloon. An ENBD catheter (.) was routinely placed into the CBD after stone removal.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

60" group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A limited sphincterotomy (EST) was performed prior to the EPBD.The length of the sphincterotomy incision was limited to a third of the size of the papilla. A CRE balloon (diameter 10, 12, 15, 18) was chosen according to the diameter of bile duct. The balloon was then gradually filled with diluted contrast medium under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance to observe the disappearance of the waist. Once the waist disappeared, the balloon remained inflated for 60 seconds. The stones were then retrieved by a basket or retrieval balloon. An ENBD catheter (.) was routinely placed into the CBD after stone removal.

Duration for 180" group

A limited sphincterotomy measuring up to one-third of the size of the papilla was first performed. Dilation with a controlled radial expansion (CRE) balloon (diameter 10, 12, 15, 18 ) was performed after the sphincterotomy. The balloon was centered at the sphincter and gradually filled with diluted contrast under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance until waisting was abolished. Once the waist had disappeared, the balloon was kept in position for 180 seconds. The stones were then removed by a basket or retrieval balloon. An ENBD catheter (.) was routinely placed into the CBD after stone removal.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

180" group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A limited sphincterotomy (EST) was performed prior to the EPBD.The length of the sphincterotomy incision was limited to a third of the size of the papilla. A CRE balloon (diameter 10, 12, 15, 18 ) was chosen according to the diameter of bile duct. The balloon was then gradually filled with diluted contrast medium under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance to observe the disappearance of the waist. Once the waist disappeared, the balloon remained inflated for 180 seconds. The stones were then retrieved by a basket or retrieval balloon. An ENBD catheter (.) was routinely placed into the CBD after stone removal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

30" group

A limited sphincterotomy (EST) was performed prior to the EPBD.The length of the sphincterotomy incision was limited to a third of the size of the papilla. A CRE balloon (diameter 10, 12, 15, 18) was chosen according to the diameter of bile duct. The balloon was then gradually filled with diluted contrast medium under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance to observe the disappearance of the waist. Once the waist disappeared, the balloon remained inflated for 30 seconds. The stones were then retrieved by a basket or retrieval balloon. An ENBD catheter (.) was routinely placed into the CBD after stone removal.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

60" group

A limited sphincterotomy (EST) was performed prior to the EPBD.The length of the sphincterotomy incision was limited to a third of the size of the papilla. A CRE balloon (diameter 10, 12, 15, 18) was chosen according to the diameter of bile duct. The balloon was then gradually filled with diluted contrast medium under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance to observe the disappearance of the waist. Once the waist disappeared, the balloon remained inflated for 60 seconds. The stones were then retrieved by a basket or retrieval balloon. An ENBD catheter (.) was routinely placed into the CBD after stone removal.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

180" group

A limited sphincterotomy (EST) was performed prior to the EPBD.The length of the sphincterotomy incision was limited to a third of the size of the papilla. A CRE balloon (diameter 10, 12, 15, 18 ) was chosen according to the diameter of bile duct. The balloon was then gradually filled with diluted contrast medium under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance to observe the disappearance of the waist. Once the waist disappeared, the balloon remained inflated for 180 seconds. The stones were then retrieved by a basket or retrieval balloon. An ENBD catheter (.) was routinely placed into the CBD after stone removal.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* CBD stone patients, age≥18 years
* Stone diameter≤1.5cm

Exclusion Criteria

* Unwilling to consent for the study
* Previous EST or EPBD
* Prior surgery of Bismuth Ⅱ and Roux-en-Y
* Benign or malignant CBD stricture
* Preoperative coexistent diseases: acute pancreatitis, GI tract hemorrhage, severe liver disease, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), septic shock
* Pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

RenJi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Li Kewei, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +8613003232119

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Li Kewei, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PYZY16-011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id