Noninvasive Measurement of CO Using Impedance Cardiography in Patients With CHD

NCT ID: NCT02326649

Last Updated: 2017-04-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-31

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will test the capability of a non-invasive instrument (the PhysioFlow impedance cardiography instrument) to measure cardiac output in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). This instrument works by placing electrodes on the skin of a patient and measuring electrical impedance through the chest, which is proportional to blood volume and blood flow at any given time. The instrument has been validated in patients with structurally normal hearts, but in the only two studies using it for patients with CHD, it was deemed too inaccurate for clinical use. The manufacturer of the device would require access to data on the patients in order to improve its accuracy, and that has not been feasible thus far. This study would begin by comparing cardiac output based on the PhysioFlow monitor to standard techniques, then after possible changes to the instrument to enhance accuracy, would test the instrument again in the same way.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The measurement of cardiac output (CO) is important for a wide variety of patients under multiple conditions. At present, gold standard techniques for measurement of CO include velocity encoded phase contrast MRI. Both of these techniques are valid in patients with structural CHD. Disadvantages of these techniques include the requirement of significant time and expertise, and the high cost and anesthesia requirement. Accurate, non-invasive tools to measure CO could be extremely valuable for patients with CHD that require one-time of continuous monitoring of CO, such as during surgery, in intensive care settings, during other diagnostic testing, and during different physiologic states such as sleep and exercise. This study would begin by comparing cardiac output based on the PhysioFlow monitor to cardiac outout by MRI.

Impedance cardiography is performed by placing electrodes on the thorax and neck to measure electrical impedance over time. Cardiac output is derived from these measurements. The technique has been studied, validated, and used extensively in adults and has also been shown to be valid in children with structurally normal hearts. In contrast, recent studies of children with CHD have shown a relatively poor agreement between impedance cardiography and both thermodilution technique and velocity encoded phase contrast MRI. The reasons for the poor agreement in CHD patients is not yet understood. There are proprietary algorithms in each impedance device that use the raw data to calculate and report cardiac output. If the physiologic and/or anatomic differences of patients with CHD require changing the algorithm within each system to account for such differences, that needs to be done to each system. In order to do this, owners of any given device (PhysioFlow, NeuMeDx Inc. in this case) need access to the raw data in order to alter the algorithm. This study will involve a concerted effort between investigators at RCHSD, UCSD, and NeuMeDx

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congenital Heart Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CHD patients undergoing cardiac MRI without sedation

Physioflow

Intervention Type DEVICE

impedance cardiography instrument that measures cardiac output non-invasively

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Physioflow

impedance cardiography instrument that measures cardiac output non-invasively

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any form of congenital heart disease
* Any age

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with significant clinical skin reactions to electrodes such as excessive pain and/or skin inflammation, or significant previous skin reaction
* Subjects who are not able to provide consent
* Subjects with pacemaker
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Christopher Davis

PI

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rady Children's Hospital

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

140550

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Doppler Feasibility Study
NCT06093373 COMPLETED
DIGIPREDICT-Physio-DE
NCT05886569 UNKNOWN NA